3
submitted 1 week ago by ciferecaNinjo@fedia.io to c/cash@slrpnk.net

(crossposted to !brussels)

A decent bank has their own (insourced) ATMs. This protects consumers from lots of shenanigans, like:

  • centralised surveillance
  • centralised power
  • ATMs that eat your card because its shitty AI decided something there is an irregularity (such as wrong PIN entered or too much cash was requested in relation to an ever decreasing nannied threshold allowance)
  • denial of service based on criteria set by the cartel (not by your bank)
  • small banknotes (≤€50)
  • daily and weekly withdrawal limits (if there is only one ATM network, that network’s limit is imposed on you without recourse using competing ATM networks)
  • reduced services (e.g. no balance inquiry; no deposits)

AFAIK, the only banks good enough to have their own ATM are AXA (Crelan), Attijariwafa and maybe Chabba?

Related: The Dutch ATM shit-show spreads to Belgium

(update) also related: Why you might want to avoid banking at BNP Parabas, bPost, Ing, Belfius, Aion/UniCredit

no comments (yet)
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
there doesn't seem to be anything here
this post was submitted on 27 Feb 2026
3 points (100.0% liked)

Cashless society, forced banking 💳, and the War on Cash 💰

99 readers
4 users here now

In many regions people are being forced patronize banks. This community is for that discussion regardless of which side of the war on cash you are on.

The war on cash is war on privacy. (indeed the mod is biased)

related communities (decentralized only)

closely related:
!cashless_society@nano.garden (ghost node) ← only reachable from instances that federated to that community before nano.garden disappeared

loosely related:
!offgrid@slrpnk.net
!climate_action_individual@slrpnk.net
!fightforprivacy@feddit.ch
!personalfinance@sopuli.xyz
!right_to_unplug@sopuli.xyz

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS