2
submitted 10 hours ago by ciferecaNinjo@fedia.io to c/Law@europe.pub

This is an EU Directive for which I want to find the Belgian transposition:

https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/NIM/?uri=CELEX%3A32009L0125

The EU links are useless.. no txt. So I go here:

https://www.ejustice.just.fgov.be/

and search based on the publication date (to and from 27.07.2011). There are 4 pages of hits. I cannot see how to narrow that down to directive 2009/125/EC.

This is a common problem.. I always struggle to find the Belgian transposition of EU directives. Any ideas on something that works generally? I tried searching “2009/125/EC” on the Belgian site as well as “32009L0125”, and nothing is found.

1
submitted 10 hours ago by ciferecaNinjo@fedia.io to c/Belgium@europe.pub

This is an EU Directive for which I want to find the Belgian transposition:

https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/NIM/?uri=CELEX%3A32009L0125

The EU links are useless.. no txt. So I go here:

https://www.ejustice.just.fgov.be/

and search based on the publication date (to and from 27.07.2011). There are 4 pages of hits. I cannot see how to narrow that down to directive 2009/125/EC.

This is a common problem.. I always struggle to find the Belgian transposition of EU directives. Any ideas on something that works generally? I tried searching “2009/125/EC” on the Belgian site as well as “32009L0125”, and nothing is found.

[-] ciferecaNinjo@fedia.io 2 points 11 hours ago

Ice cubes would be interesting for non-fortified wine. But I suppose sherry might not freeze at 15% alc. (not sure).

Anyway, someone just said only 12% alc is needed for shelf-stability and someone else said 15% is fine for the shelf, so that solves the problem. Sherry can simply be kept at room temp.

[-] ciferecaNinjo@fedia.io 1 points 11 hours ago

Glad to hear about the 12% threshold. All the cheap sherry I have easy local access to are 15%.

[-] ciferecaNinjo@fedia.io 2 points 12 hours ago

Cooking wine is indeed cheaper and lower quality. But more importantly it is shelf-stable. You can open a bottle of cooking wine and keep it in the cupboard. The stuff is labelled “cooking wine” in the US so that it is treated as such. It probably gets around some of the tight liquor controls there.

Europe does not seem to have a product with preservatives specifically for that purpose. So you would use substandard wines for cooking. If champaign goes flat because an open bottle sat out overnight, it’s still good for risotto. But I would still chill it if I weren’t making risotto the next day. In the case at hand, I don’t want to be keeping a bottle of sherry in the fridge.

When using a whole bottle in a day, then of course there is no issue. But it takes me a year to get through a bottle of Sherry.

7
submitted 12 hours ago by ciferecaNinjo@fedia.io to c/cooking@mander.xyz

In my area, cooking wine does not exist. I can only easily find Sherry (for drinking) at 15% alcohol. I was told it should have 20% to be shelf-stable for ~6—24 months.

There is white port at 19½% alc. Not sure if that differs much from sherry in taste, but I suppose 19½% is close enough for shelf-stability.

Should I add table salt to the sherry to make it shelf stable? Or add brandy? Or switch to white port? Or even just brandy?

My main use: less than ~½—¾ shot mixed with corn starch as the thickening basis for stir-fries. I don’t really use sherry for anything else. I don’t even drink it because I so commonly use it in stir-fries that as a straight drink it’s like drinking Kung Pao Chicken because I can’t mentally dissociate it.

I also wonder if I should be looking for dry sherry, or simple sherry. I want the stir-fries to have the sweetness of strong sherry, so I guess dry variants would be contrary to that.

9
submitted 12 hours ago by ciferecaNinjo@fedia.io to c/food@beehaw.org

In my area, cooking wine does not exist. I can only easily find Sherry (for drinking) at 15% alcohol. I was told it should have 20% to be shelf-stable for ~6—24 months.

There is white port at 19½% alc. Not sure if that differs much from sherry in taste, but I suppose 19½% is close enough for shelf-stability.

Should I add table salt to the sherry to make it shelf stable? Or add brandy? Or switch to white port? Or even just brandy?

My main use: less than ~½—¾ shot mixed with corn starch as the thickening basis for stir-fries. I don’t really use sherry for anything else. I don’t even drink it because I so commonly use it in stir-fries that as a straight drink it’s like drinking Kung Pao Chicken because I can’t mentally dissociate it.

I also wonder if I should be looking for dry sherry, or simple sherry. I want the stir-fries to have the sweetness of strong sherry, so I guess dry variants would be contrary to that.

4
submitted 12 hours ago by ciferecaNinjo@fedia.io to c/bugs@sopuli.xyz
1
submitted 2 days ago by ciferecaNinjo@fedia.io to c/cash@slrpnk.net

(crossposted to !smartphone_required)

A bank sent emails instructing customers to take a KYC interview in their app.

What if you don’t have the app? You get a get-out-of-jail free card? I’m betting marginalisation. Those without the app will lose access to their money.

Even if you have the app, an app-based interrogation is likely rife with shenanigans. Banks are sneaky. Bankers are like cops. They will ask one question at a time. They can track how long you sit on a question. You won’t know how many questions are ahead. The sensitivity of the questions will gradually escalate. If you reach a question that goes too far and say “fuck this, I’m out”, you would have already given them excessive sensitive data, creating a “point of no return” scenario. You can’t take the previous answers back at that point.

When I get a KYC interrogation, I require seeing ALL the questions at once before answering the 1st one. If just 1 question goes beyond my threshold of tolerance, I need to say “fuck off” and give them nothing.

13

A bank sent emails instructing customers to take a KYC interview in their app.

What if you don’t have the app? You get a get-out-of-jail free card? I’m betting marginalisation. Those without the app will lose access to their money.

Even if you have the app, an app-based interrogation is likely rife with shenanigans. Banks are sneaky. Bankers are like cops. They will ask one question at a time. They can track how long you sit on a question. You won’t know how many questions are ahead. The sensitivity of the questions will gradually escalate. If you reach a question that goes too far and say “fuck this, I’m out”, you would have already given them excessive sensitive data, creating a “point of no return” scenario. You can’t take the previous answers back at that point.

When I get a KYC interrogation, I require seeing ALL the questions at once before answering the 1st one. If just 1 question goes beyond my threshold of tolerance, I need to say “fuck off” and give them nothing.

[-] ciferecaNinjo@fedia.io 3 points 5 days ago

still dead for me. Perhaps they are quietly blocking Tor.

3

(Crossposted on !dabradio)

I have these receivers:

  1. TechniSat TechniRadio1 (shitty amp/speaker quality)
  2. Envivo Retro (shitty amp/speaker quality; antenna: 66cm)
  3. Envivo PO-1585 (good amp/speaker quality; antenna: 90cm)

I won’t talk about receiver ① because it behaves the same as receiver ②. ② & ③ are the same brand but they behave differently. Envivo is perhaps just an Aldi rebranding from different makers.

② finds 101 signals but only “BBC WS” (World Service) from the BBC. Most importantly, it can tune BBC WS at any time.

③ finds 57 or 72 signals (probably depending on weather at the time of the scan). It always finds these BBC stations:

  • BBC WS
  • BBCAsian
  • BBC R6M (radio 6 Music)
  • BBC R5L (radio 5 Live)
  • BBC R4Ex (radio 4 Extra)
  • BBC R3
  • BBC R2
  • BBC R1
  • BBC R1x (radio 1 Xtra)

③ cannot tune any of the BBC stations. It only finds them. Exceptionally, a couple floors above ground it tuned BBC WS, once. Apart from that one time, it either says “connecting…” indefinitately, or “service not available”.

WTF is going on here? It might be normal for one receiver to have a better tuner than another, but in this case one finds many more BBC stations but tunes none of them. We might speculate that the scanning algorithm of the radio that finds more stations just has a lower signal/quality threshold for what it accepts, but the one finding more BBC finds fewer stations overall.

It’s a shame that despite the invasion of the Internet of Shit (IoT), radio makers have not realised it would be greatly useful to be able to attach a radio to the LAN to access tuning info from a PC.

6

I see that someone posted there just 11 hours ago, so it may be temporary.

I was also able to post just now, but I guess mbin masks quite well the case of the host node being offline because it posted fine, probably just to a fedia.io cache of dabradio.

2

I have these receivers:

  1. TechniSat TechniRadio1 (shitty amp/speaker quality)
  2. Envivo Retro (shitty amp/speaker quality; antenna: 66cm)
  3. Envivo PO-1585 (good amp/speaker quality; antenna: 90cm)

I won’t talk about receiver ① because it behaves the same as receiver ②. ② & ③ are the same brand but they behave differently. Envivo is perhaps just an Aldi rebranding from different makers.

② finds 101 signals but only “BBC WS” (World Service) from the BBC. Most importantly, it can tune BBC WS at any time.

③ finds 57 or 72 signals (probably depending on weather at the time of the scan). It always finds these BBC stations:

  • BBC WS
  • BBCAsian
  • BBC R6M (radio 6 Music)
  • BBC R5L (radio 5 Live)
  • BBC R4Ex (radio 4 Extra)
  • BBC R3
  • BBC R2
  • BBC R1
  • BBC R1x (radio 1 Xtra)

③ cannot tune any of the BBC stations. It only finds them. Exceptionally, a couple floors above ground it tuned BBC WS, once. Apart from that one time, it either says “connecting…” indefinitately, or “service not available”.

WTF is going on here? It might be normal for one receiver to have a better tuner than another, but in this case one finds many more BBC stations but tunes none of them. We might speculate that the scanning algorithm of the radio that finds more stations just has a lower signal/quality threshold for what it accepts, but the one finding more BBC finds fewer stations overall.

It’s a shame that despite the invasion of the Internet of Shit (IoT), radio makers have not realised it would be greatly useful to be able to attach a radio to the LAN to access tuning info from a PC.

update

③ was bought 2nd hand. I scanned and rescanned many times. It kept finding many BBC stations that apparently do not exist. Then I did a factory reset and a purge (w/out really knowing what purge meant in the context it appeared). The new scan then yielded mostly the same stations as ②, but a subset thereof.

So I’m calling this a software defect in receiver ③. Scanning should not require a factory reset.

6

Like most libraries, the public libraries in Belgium have a GUI online search page to search their catalog. The websites are often Tor-hostile. Some of them work with a text browser but it’s a bit rough going. And of course it’s impossible for offline people to search for books or media.

The Belgian gov is generally obligated under the constitution and open data laws to share their data. So does that include libraries? I think it would be interesting to have a local copy of all book and movie titles that I can search without having to be online and without whatever limitations their UI creates.

Belgian libraries are subject to some degree of enshitification because they do not implement their own tech. They outsource to private entities like Cisco. And Cisco operates as cheaply as possible. Cisco will not give support and does not care if some people are marginalised. If their captive portal is broken on your device, or you have no GSM number to verify via the captive portal, there is no recourse.

It’s a bit of a blur with libraries what is public and what is private. If the media dataset is held by some private entity, I wonder if it’s regarded as non-public and thus not subject to being liberated by open data law.

4

(crossposted from !rotterdam)

There is a quite good hole-in-the-wall Indonesian restaurant in Rotterdam with very generous portions as a quite low cost. Just like many Indian restaurants that serve Pompedams with tubs of different sauces, Indonesian restaurants also serve a few sauces and chutneys.

The tubs of sauces are huge. One of the tubs looked like at least ½ bottle of soy sauce. These were open uncovered containers. So if a customer were to cough or sneeze, they could easily contaminate the sauces.

Either they are extremely wasteful and throw away ~33—50cl of sauce per table, or they are re-serving it. I don’t imagine they could afford to be so wasteful as low as prices are. They must be topping it up and re-serving it. Is it legal?

There is a commercial kitchen hygiene principle that any food that leaves the kitchen never returns to the kitchen. I don’t recall where I heard that, or whether it’s law or just mitigating a restaurant’s own liability.

The theoretical fix to avoid waste and also avoid the hygiene problem is to take the sauces home in a doggie bag or bring Tupperware. But it seems a bit off unless they are actually wasting it anyway.

[-] ciferecaNinjo@fedia.io 43 points 2 years ago

In Brussels there is a library that’s “open” as late as 22:00. There’s an after hours program where you register for after hours access, sign an agreement, and your library card can be used to unlock the door. Staff is gone during off hours but cameras are on. Members are not allowed to enter with non-members (can’t let anyone tailgate you incl. your friends).

[-] ciferecaNinjo@fedia.io 27 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

I don’t get why my fellow pirates try so hard to justify what they’re doing. We want something and we don’t want to pay the price for it because it’s either too expensive or too difficult, so we go the cheaper, easier route. And because these are large corporations trying to fuck everyone out of every last dime, we don’t feel guilt about it.

Justification is important to those who act against unethical systems. You have to separate the opportunists from the rest. An opportunist will loot any defenseless shop without the slightest sense of ethics. That’s not the same group as those who either reject an unjust system or specifically condemn a particular supplier (e.g. Sony, who is an ALEC member and who was caught unlawfully using GPL code in their DRM tools). Some would say it’s our ethical duty to do everything possible to boycott, divest, and punish Sony until they are buried.

We have a language problem that needs sorting. While it may almost¹ be fair enough to call an opportunist a “pirate” who engages in “piracy”, these words are chosen abusively as a weapon against even those who practice civil disobedience against a bad system.

  1. I say /almost/ because even in the simple case of an opportunistic media grab, equating them with those who rape and pillage is still a bit off (as RMS likes to mention).

I think you see the same problem with the thread title that I do - it’s clever but doesn’t really give a solid grounds for ethically driven actions. But it still helps to capture the idea that paying consumers are getting underhandedly deceptively stiffed by crippled purchases, which indeed rationalizes civil disobedience to some extent.

[-] ciferecaNinjo@fedia.io 27 points 2 years ago

Among the primary benefits: no commute, flexible work schedules and less time getting ready for work, according to WFH Research.

They forgot: being able to secretly simultaneously work 3 full-time overlapping jobs to triple your income.

[-] ciferecaNinjo@fedia.io 31 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

More fun to mention 11 “states” at a 5.1% uninsured cutoff, because number 11 is Peurto Rico -- a US territory that you might expect to be less developed. Since people are forced to run javascript to see the list, I’ll copy it here up to the 6% point:

  1. Massachusetts
  2. District of Columbia
  3. Hawaii
  4. Vermont
  5. Iowa (what’s a red state doing here?)
  6. Rhode Island
  7. Minnesota
  8. New Hampshire
  9. Michigan
  10. New York
  11. Puerto Rico
  12. Connecticut
  13. Pennsylvania
  14. Wisconsin
  15. Kentucky (what’s a red state doing here?)
  16. Delaware
  17. Ohio (what’s a red state doing here? OH will worsen over time; to be fair they only recently became solidly red)
  18. West Virginia

(22) California (6.5%.. worse than we might expect for CA)

(52) Texas ← ha! Of course Texass is last. 16.6% uninsured in the most notable red state showing us how to take care of people

The general pattern is expected.. the bottom of the list is mostly red states.

[-] ciferecaNinjo@fedia.io 26 points 2 years ago

I wonder if the 2024 diesel Volvos will become high-value collector’s items. There’ll always be that niche of hobbyists who refine their own biodiesel from waste oil.

[-] ciferecaNinjo@fedia.io 82 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

“The trend of “autobesity” is forcing car park providers to think of new ways to accommodate larger cars, such as introducing wider bays.”

That’s the most disgusting part of this. They are adapting the infrastructure to accommodate the child killers when the sensible approach is #fuckBigCars.

#fuckCars in general.

[-] ciferecaNinjo@fedia.io 32 points 2 years ago

Indeed. What happened with cars in the US is an “arms race” on the road. Everyone wants to be in the bigger car so they just get bigger and bigger and reach a point where that e=mc² equation is pegged.

max selfishness → max energy

As expected, right-wing U.S. republicans disproportionately drive big cars. While liberals tend to favor small cars or bicycles.

[-] ciferecaNinjo@fedia.io 43 points 2 years ago

Gender is somewhat relevant here-- according to my women studies course in uni. When women are describing a problem, they don’t usually want solutions. They want support, understanding, & sympathy, contrary to the typical male response which is to give advice & propose solutions, which then has a good chance of ending badly.

view more: next ›

ciferecaNinjo

joined 2 years ago
MODERATOR OF