9

Archived link

...

In the few weeks since Carney’s visit to Beijing to meet with Chinese President Xi Jinping and other communist leaders, Canadians have learned that the new strategic partnership announced between the two countries was much more than trade negotiations related to canola and EV cars. There were multiple agreements made and MOUs signed that have established police and law enforcement cooperation in the name of “public safety and security,” increased access for Chinese media and communications in Canada, and alignment on government policy for climate change objectives and global governance agendas, including Canada’s recognition of the One China Policy.

Former Canadian ambassador to China, David Mulroney, questioned Carney’s deal making with Beijing, as the government seems to be willfully ignoring serious issues of foreign interference in Canada and dismissing China’s longstanding strategic foreign affairs objective of pulling Canada away from its traditional allies.

...

Mulroney warns of the real possibility of the country becoming a “vassal state” of China. In a post this week on X, Mulroney stated: “Our relationship loop with China is now in its See No Evil phase, in which the government pretends that interference is inevitable and can be managed. This will last until interference becomes so egregious and corrosive that it’s impossible to ignore. Give it a year or so.”

...

The wisdom of the Carney Liberals to advance new, more entangled relations with the CCP is being brought into question almost daily with new revelations about what the deals may contain and new facts emerging about how nefarious the CCP activities have been in Canada. This is an unfolding story that just this week featured two major news items, which reflected new light on the Canada-China strategic partnership. First, Conservative MPs Micheal Chong and Frank Caputo called on the government to release the details of the MOU on intelligence sharing between China’s Ministry of Public Security and Canada’s RCMP. The government has deemed the MOU “confidential” and does not intend on releasing any details to MPs. This is disconcerting for Garry Clement, former national director of the RCMP’s proceeds-of-crime program, who advises in an Epoch Times interview that the new police agreement may potentially permit the CCP to “capitalize on intelligence,” and this can jeopardize Canada’s credibility with its allies, with the Five Eyes intelligence alliance, and with diaspora groups, who already are unnerved with CCP police stations operating in Canadian cities.

...

A second breaking news story this week is a published report that details how the CCP is directing espionage and foreign interference operations throughout western democracies, and Canada is a particular target. The report’s investigation identifies 575 Beijing-linked organizations that are active in Canada: “the Party’s weapon that it uses to expand control and influence without force.” In response, the MLI held a quickly arranged news conference in Ottawa at which Christopher Coates, its foreign policy and national security director, stated, “The question is no longer whether this is happening. The question is whether Canada is prepared to respond with the seriousness that the evidence demands.” Indeed, that is the question.

...

all 26 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] gandhibobandhi@feddit.org 26 points 1 week ago

Until China starts openly threatening canada's sovreignty, they will be a better friend than the US.

This will last until interference becomes so egregious and corrosive that it’s impossible to ignore.

The US government has been meeting with Canadian seperatists and that is already impossible to ignore. Is Chinese interference going to be more profound than that?

the CCP is directing espionage and foreign interference operations throughout western democracies, and Canada is a particular target

The US government has been spying on it's allies for decades. At least china doesn't pretend to be our friend while they do it.

“the Party’s weapon that it uses to expand control and influence without force.”

Sounds preferable to open threats of military invasion.

[-] Contextual_Idiot@sh.itjust.works 24 points 1 week ago

I wonder why you left out these parts of the article...

“Mark Carney is being elevated much the way Justin Trudeau was… What I am most shocked about is that everybody seems to think that this is some kind of radical departure and that Trump’s belligerents is driving Canada reluctantly into the arms of Beijing. Is there anyone who can explain to me, or tell me, that if Kamala Harris had been elected a year and a bit ago in the American election, do we really think that Mark Carney would have done anything different? This is bread in the bone with these people. It is what they do and what they have always done. Whatever you make of any of this, could you please leave off with this business that Trump is driving us into the arms of China. This is where the Trudeau Liberals unfortunately feel most comfortable. It goes back to Justin Trudeau’s dad. What is happening here is the revival and reconstitution of a lot of protocols and MOUs that were in place during the Justin Trudeau period, the Dominic Barton period, before the Chinese pushed the envelope a bit by kidnapping Michael Kovrig and Michael Spavor, and before the public revelations about the degree to which the Chinese were influencing and monkey-wrenching our federal election system.”

“Mélanie Joly musing about Canada and China building EVs together – this is just the same old story of the Liberal Party of Canada elites turning a blind eye to Trojan horses for Chinese intelligence infiltration, stealing of Canada’s world-leading technology like the Nortel case… Why is Mark Carney moving ahead with these absurd deals? My theory is… Scott Bessett at the White House is saying, ‘Who’s Carney working for?’ Look, he is trying to thread the needle between his patrons, the industrialists in Montreal that I’ve reported have been in bed with the Chinese communist elite, along with Jean Chrétien for decades. He is working with and for them. He is working for a majority. His elbows up rhetoric is still winning, anti-US, anti-Donald Trump. They’ve got a ticket to be a majority government for a long time unless Canadians smarten up. Here is the key: Mark Carney knows that if we don’t get an American trade deal, China doesn’t even care about us anymore – we matter because of our trade integration with the U.S. and the world.”

Gee, I wonder who's viewpoint this article is trying to push.

Plus quoting The Epoch Times? Yikes.

[-] SamuelRJankis@sh.itjust.works 12 points 1 week ago

First pinned post by the author of the article. https://xcancel.com/ByGeorgeJournal

He's trying to say last 10 year as in since the Liberal won(end 2015), but what he's actually probably using the last 10 reported years(2014-2024). Which includes some real bad end of Harper years. As far as I know the 2025 data is not available yet and in general I feel like the dude pulled the entire thing out of his ass.

https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NY.GDP.PCAP.CD?locations=CA

Also as usual just to point out the flawed Conservative logic. Even if the graph was correct, it sure seems like a real crap metric on how people feel about how country is doing.

Also regarding the site as a whole:

https://niagaraindependent.ca/contributors-bios/#author

Catherine Swift - current Director of the Fraser Institute

Janet Ecker - Former Conservative MLA

Lee Harding - Former Saskatchewan Director for the Canadian Taxpayers Federation

[-] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

You had me at the Fraser Institute! Nice collection of pro-US right wing operatives.

[-] Scotty@scribe.disroot.org 1 points 1 week ago

You have apparently commented in the wrong thread. Your comment has nothing to do with linked article's content and China.

[-] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 week ago

@Scotty@scribe.disroot.org , @Sepia@mander.xyz, can we stick to one sockpuppet account per thread?

I'm sorry you think that, but I'm not the one with half-dozen accounts spamming China-bad all day, every day:

Username Start End
tardigrada@beehaw.org May 2022 Dec. 2024
0x815@feddit.de Apr. 2023 Jun. 2024
thelucky8@beehaw.org Apr. 2024 Jan. 2025
0x815@feddit.org Jun. 2024 Dec. 2024
Anyone@slrpnk.net Jan. 2025 Apr. 2025
randomname@scribe.disroot.org Jan. 2025
Hotznplotzn@lemmy.sdf.org Jan. 2025
Scotty@scribe.disroot.org Aug. 2025
Sepia@mander.xyz Nov. 2025
[-] CaisideQC@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 week ago

WTF, im new to this whole decentralized social media thing but tracking associated accounts is wild if that's what im seeing

[-] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

A few people on Lemmy, from various instances have noticed this set of accounts posting on the same topics, with almost identical style of writing and engagement over the last few years. It's just people who've had shitty experiences with the sockpuppets who've crowdsourced an informal table. I've tried engaging in good faith in the past before I figured what's going on. 😄 As far as the fediverse is concerned, it's no different than someone creating 10 Reddit accounts to astroturf whatever topics they're interested in. There's nothing wrong with having alts. There are many legit purposes. I don't like astroturfing so I'm calling it out when I see it, so people are aware.

[-] L_N@piefed.ca 8 points 1 week ago

The Epoch Times is the summum of garbage propaganda. It's so shitty that a started to laugh when I received their paper by the mail.

[-] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 week ago

Is there anyone who can explain to me, or tell me, that if Kamala Harris had been elected a year and a bit ago in the American election, do we really think that Mark Carney would have done anything different?

This is hysterical. 🤣

[-] TheFeatureCreature@lemmy.ca 11 points 1 week ago

In an ideal world Canada would not need to choose between such nations for economic stability but we got caught with our pants down and need to scramble for solutions fast.

China has been greatly expanding their projection of soft power while the US surrendered theirs almost entirely to focus on hard power. Surprising literally nobody, making threats of invasion and abducting leaders of other nations is a great way to drive away your (ex) allies and trade partners.

[-] L_N@piefed.ca 7 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Conservatism in Canada is an empty shell that think tanks fill.

[-] Rentlar@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 week ago

We need to make our relationship with China closer to "neutral", as our relationship with the US is forced to become more adversarial.

[-] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 5 points 1 week ago

Yeah, they're seeming pretty comparable as partners these days. The US is much closer, but we still can do business with China, or play them off of each other by giving them both a fairly equal chance.

Mandatory mention of Europe.

this post was submitted on 17 Feb 2026
9 points (100.0% liked)

Canada

11654 readers
685 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS