I knew someone planted the seed in his head to invade. Trump is too dumb and vacuous to have curiosity about somewhere as random as Greenland. A couple mega wealthy nepo babies bonding over their rapacious greed. How cute!
He's also the kind of Dump Ape that is so avaricious that he looks at a map, and says "That's big, I want it." And I have heard multiple reports that is pretty much how it happened. Everything else is just rationalization. Also, Bolton is as much a scumbag as Trump.
Also Ghengis Don doesn't know what a Mercator Projection is, and if he'd heard of it, he wouldn't understand it. But, for reals, he's never heard of it.
He’s using the murica-tor projection.
Lauder: You don't have a micropenis. Can you invade Greenland?
The Rapist: Say it once more and Greenscape is yours.
What an absolute ghoul.
A ghoul who will suffer no consequences, because while Europe is sending parade units to flex on the beaches of Qeqertarsuaq this asshole is allowed to continue operating Estée Lauder across the continent.
If he were Russian, he'd be drowning under sanctions right now. Instead, the guy gets to bait the US into the worst Intra-NATO conflict since Cyprus and pocket a windfall no questions asked.
A ghoul who will suffer no consequences
The future is unwritten.
The writing is on the wall
Think it's also a way to get rich. My husband told me military and defense related stocks went up (he's tracking politician trading)
I haven't followed myself but can believe that.
I wouldn't take the word of John Bolton as worth anything more than toilet paper. I think the Peter Thiel connection to Greenland is much more worth discussion, and it's the main reason why Vance is VP.
Both threads of reasoning can be true simultaneously; the veracity of one doesn't negate the veracity of the other.
Normally true, but again, John Bolton. I'd probably trust him on mustache upkeep though.
He doesn't really have a reason to lie about it. What would be the point?
How well do you know who John Bolton is?
I know he's a right-wing asshole. But seriously, what would be his motive for lying about something like this? What would he gain? Maybe there's an angle I hadn't considered.
I can't read his mind. As he said, coups aren't easy. He puts the term "right wing asshole" to shame. He's so bad, I'm surprised he doesn't have a Nobel Peace Prize.
Of course Lauder is connected to Epstein too.
Wow I wasn't aware of this angle. I was assuming it was all just technofascist acquisitions for Praxis, and the whole cult of Curtis Yarvin's network state monarchy CEO idea (Peter Thiel who owns JD "Just Dance" Vance).
JFC he looks JUST as evil as he is!!
These are the brands he owns, so you might avoid buying them:
Cosmetics
AERIN Beauty
Bobbi Brown
Clinique
DECIEM by Brandon Truaxe
Dr. Jart+
Estée Lauder
GLAMGLOW
La Mer
Lab Series
MAC Cosmetics
Origins
Darphin Paris
Smashbox
Too Faced[42]
Tom Ford Beauty
Fragrance
Aramis
Kilian Paris
Editions de Parfums Frédéric Malle
Jo Malone London
Le Labo
Haircare
Aveda
Bumble and bumbleHere's another source that might be worth reading
Zero shock face :-|
Let's encourage Shitler to eat more hamberders...
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.
Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.
7. No duplicate posts.
If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.
All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.