2126
fair share? (discuss.tchncs.de)
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] CrabAndBroom@lemmy.ml 207 points 1 year ago

I mean you could even take the bottom number and leave them with the top number and they could still live in unimaginable luxury forever. Or just take the lot because fuck em lol.

I couldn't imagine spending $1 billion in my entire life, let alone 3-4.

[-] Chriskmee@lemm.ee 27 points 1 year ago

Most of their billions is ownership in companies they grew into what they are today. It's not like they have billions to spend, it's that their ownership is worth billions according to the market.

[-] TurnItOff_OnAgain@lemmy.world 34 points 1 year ago

True, but that ownership gives them access to very low interest loans that they then use as spending money and don't have to pay taxes on it

https://www.businessinsider.com/american-billionaires-tax-avoidance-income-wealth-borrow-money-propublica-2021-6

load more comments (41 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] painfulasterisk@lemmy.world 38 points 1 year ago

If they are self-made millionaires/billionaires as they claim, take everything they have/own and tell them to start the quest again, no glitches, DLC, or saved progress.

[-] xenspidey@lemmy.zip 16 points 1 year ago

You all realize they don't have that money laying around to pay the IRS right? They own companies, those companies are worth that much. To pay that you would have to liquidate those companies. So no more Amazon, Tesla, Space X, etc...

[-] alvvayson@lemmy.world 39 points 1 year ago

Don't be a bootlicker or bot or idiot.

When they sell their shares to buy twitter or pay the tax man, those companies still exist. It just means that other people get to buy those shares and that's a good thing, because that way those companies get owned by the public.

Tesla and SpaceX still exist even after Elon overpaid by some $30B for his Twitter adventure.

[-] lukecooperatus@lemmy.ml 31 points 1 year ago

no more Amazon, Tesla, Space X, etc...

Oh no! Anyway, so how can we make this happen, like, yesterday?

load more comments (24 replies)
[-] Phegan@lemmy.world 138 points 1 year ago

Tax billionaires until there are no more billionaires

[-] alvvayson@lemmy.world 89 points 1 year ago

It's really insane that we legally treat the tenth billion dollars at the same level as a working persons house or car.

Everything is legally just "property".

No, fuck that.

The law should protect the first million of every citizen with ferver. (and when we tackle wealth inequality, most people will have this level of wealth at the end of their working life. The fact that most currently don't is due to inequality. )

Up until 100 million, it should be taxed at a reasonable level. Because at some level, it's fair that people prefer watching Taylor Swift instead of me sing on a stage.

Above that it should be taxed heavily.

And above a billion, it should be just confiscated. As in, oopsie, our system malfunctioned, you weren't supposed to end up with more wealth than what a thousand normal people would save up after a whole lifetime of work, so we are taking it back.

[-] thefartographer@lemm.ee 29 points 1 year ago

you weren't supposed to end up with more wealth than what a thousand normal people would save up after a while lifetime of work

I actively try to cheat at every single-player game that I play. I still don't think I've accumulated a billion anything other than self-criticisms. Even that's questionable.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (112 replies)
[-] gosling@lemmy.world 95 points 1 year ago

Do billionaires actually have billions in real money sitting around? I've always thought the billions were in stocks and couldn't be taxed until they cashed it out and they could technically lose everything if the stock price falls. That's really fucked up if true

[-] alvvayson@lemmy.world 35 points 1 year ago

Nobody keeps that amount of cash. Even below a million, most people have most of their wealth in either real estate (their own house) or financial securities (stocks, ETFs, bonds).

Yet, we all gotta pay property tax and capital gains.

The billionaires just have loopholes that they use to never realize gains with loan schemes and trust funds.

[-] gtaman@iusearchlinux.fyi 13 points 1 year ago

The billionaires just have loopholes that they use to never realize gains with loan schemes and trust funds. <

Isnt that then bigger problem than generally tax the rich?

[-] alvvayson@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago

Is there a difference?

Closing loopholes = taxing the rich

If the tax code lost all the loopholes, there probably would be no billionaires.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Omega_Haxors@lemmy.ml 81 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Sad day when "billionaires should pay taxes" is considered a far left position.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] Stumblinbear@pawb.social 56 points 1 year ago

Wealth taxes are stupid. That said, nobody needs multiple hundreds of billions of dollars.

The solution is to have regulations and laws in place that prevent them getting this large in the first place. The fact that Amazon and Google own 90% of the internet is absolutely fucked.

[-] drislands@lemmy.world 32 points 1 year ago

I agree, no one should be able to hold such an obscene amount of wealth. Right now they do, though. How do you propose this be remedied?

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] madcaesar@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago

Right, let's go back in time and fix it.

load more comments (10 replies)
[-] PatFussy@lemm.ee 41 points 1 year ago

Uhhh is the ask to liquidate their assets? They will just sell a Picaso painting that they 'value' at 60% of their gross income.

Why do you guys fetishize these billionaires and not the giant hedge fund pools that make these guys rich in the first place?

[-] MNByChoice@midwest.social 14 points 1 year ago

Um, tax those too.

We don't need to be perfect with just one proposal. We can have at least 2 proposals.

[-] nostradiel@lemmy.world 31 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Yeah and maybe also cutting down on their non-profit organisations scheme to avoid taxes would be nice..

[-] IzzyData@lemmy.ml 28 points 1 year ago

Billionaires shouldn't exist. Their fair share is more like 95%.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca 27 points 1 year ago

Counterpoint: But they don't wanna pay taxes! They don't wannaaaaaaaaaaa.... why are you being so mean to the precious billionaires?

So there are irreconcilable issues on this issue and Congress is currently too busy trying to impeach Biden because his son had dick pics on his laptop.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] const_void@lemmy.ml 26 points 1 year ago

The tax should be even higher. No one needs $100 billion.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] hark@lemmy.world 26 points 1 year ago

Wealth taxes actually work, that's why the rich attack them so vehemently.

load more comments (7 replies)
[-] Blapoo@lemmy.ml 22 points 1 year ago

I'd be willing to be taxed into oblivion if I knew it'd mean everyone else could lead full lives. And I make nothing.

Now imagine the good their excess wealth could do.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] PhlubbaDubba@lemm.ee 18 points 1 year ago

Here's the basic idea of what I'd think is fair

You have a basic rate for income below the 20th percentile of all incomes

Multiply that by 1.5 for income between that and the 40th percentile

Multiply that by 1.25 for income between that and the 60th percentile

Multiply that by 1.125 for income between that and the 80th percentile

Multiply that by 1.0625 for income between that and the 95th percentile

Multiply that by 1.03125 for income between that and the 99th percentile

Multiply that by 1.015625 for all income above the 99th percentile, with the additional caveat that people who top this bracket even once cannot hold public office, donate to political campaigns, or hire lobbyists and lobbying firms for ten years following them topping out.

Imagine something similar for taxes on units of housing owned, dividends earned, and so on and so forth.

The idea being that the highest rate can't be adjusted without significantly reducing the tax burden of the poorest, basically erasing the only way conservatives have been able to balance the books whenever they try that shit.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] Cornerspace@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago

Unpopular opinion: You’ll get the same amount out of the billionaires if you tax them 3% or 97%.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] TonyTonyChopper@mander.xyz 13 points 1 year ago
[-] mkwt@lemmy.world 21 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

3% annually would be really huge, and probably shrink a lot of personal wealth out there. 3% one time is not as big of a deal, but it also doesn't raise so much revenue. The problem with a one time wealth tax is it incentivizes a future government to try a second one-time wealth tax, and then maybe a third. Soon enough it's not really a one-time tax any more.

In the United States there would also be a serious question on whether wealth tax was constitutional. The income tax was not raised until the 16th amendment explicitly gave Congress the power. It's possible the court will say there's no power to levy a national wealth tax absent an amendment.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] kn0wmad1c@programming.dev 13 points 1 year ago

This is a wealth tax, not an income tax.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Peaty@sh.itjust.works 13 points 1 year ago

As of this point every wealth tax that has been implemented ends up getting abandoned because if how inefficient they are. It's like rent control, it sounds great on paper bu historically never works out like it was planned.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] EdibleFriend@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago

When do we start burning things.

[-] AeonFelis@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago

Even if the wealth tax will get passed, it'll cost much less than a billion dollars to hire a big and expensive team of lawyers and accountants that can find several ways to bypass it.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 30 Sep 2023
2126 points (100.0% liked)

Lefty Memes

4524 readers
1016 users here now

An international (English speaking) socialist Lemmy community free of the "ML" influence of instances like lemmy.ml and lemmygrad. This is a place for undogmatic shitposting and memes from a progressive, anti-capitalist and truly anti-imperialist perspective, regardless of specific ideology.

Serious posts, news, and discussion go in c/Socialism.

If you are new to socialism, you can ask questions and find resources over on c/Socialism101.

Please don't forget to help keep this community clean by reporting rule violations, updooting good contributions and downdooting those of low-quality!

Rules

Version without spoilers

0. Only post socialist memes


That refers to funny image macros and means that generally videos and screenshots are not allowed. Exceptions include explicitly humorous and short videos, as well as (social media) screenshots depicting a funny situation, joke, or joke picture relating to socialist movements, theory, societal issues, or political opponents. Examples would be the classic case of humorous Tumblr or Twitter posts/threads. (and no, agitprop text does not count as a meme)


1. Socialist Unity in the form of mutual respect and good faith interactions is enforced here


Try to keep an open mind, other schools of thought may offer points of view and analyses you haven't considered yet. Also: This is not a place for the Idealism vs. Materialism or rather Anarchism vs. Marxism debate(s), for that please visit c/AnarchismVsMarxism.


2. Anti-Imperialism means recognizing capitalist states like Russia and China as such


That means condemning (their) imperialism, even if it is of the "anti-USA" flavor.


3. No liberalism, (right-wing) revisionism or reactionaries.


That includes so called: Social Democracy, Democratic Socialism, Dengism, Market Socialism, Patriotic Socialism, National Bolshevism, Anarcho-Capitalism etc. . Anti-Socialist people and content have no place here, as well as the variety of "Marxist"-"Leninists" seen on lemmygrad and more specifically GenZedong (actual ML's are welcome as long as they agree to the rules and don't just copy paste/larp about stuff from a hundred years ago).


4. No Bigotry.


The only dangerous minority is the rich.


5. Don't demonize previous and current socialist experiments or (leading) individuals.


We must constructively learn from their mistakes, while acknowledging their achievements and recognizing when they have strayed away from socialist principles.

(if you are reading the rules to apply for modding this community, mention "Mantic Minotaur" when answering question 2)


6. Don't idolize/glorify previous and current socialist experiments or (leading) individuals.


Notable achievements in all spheres of society were made by various socialist/people's/democratic republics around the world. Mistakes, however, were made as well: bureaucratic castes of parasitic elites - as well as reactionary cults of personality - were established, many things were mismanaged and prejudice and bigotry sometimes replaced internationalism and progressiveness.



  1. Absolutely no posts or comments meant to relativize(/apologize for), advocate, promote or defend:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS