27

OSnews blogpost links to Linux kernel version numbers by Greg K-H

top 3 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] bleistift2@sopuli.xyz 16 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

From the godfather Himself:

I'd like to point out (yet again) that we don't do feature-based releases, and that "5.0" doesn't mean anything more than that the 4.x numbers started getting big enough that I ran out of fingers and toes.

https://lwn.net/Articles/781206/

From kernel.org:

Does the major version number (4.x vs 5.x) mean anything?

No. The major version number is incremented when the number after the dot starts looking "too big." There is literally no other reason.

https://www.kernel.org/releases.html#does-the-major-version-number-4-x-vs-5-x-mean-anything

[-] onlinepersona@programming.dev 1 points 1 day ago

"Kernel version numbers are easy"

[-] kbal@fedia.io 7 points 2 days ago

$ uname -srv Linux 6.18.0-kbal #111 SMP PREEMPT Mon Dec 1 10:26:08 EST 2025

Ah yes that's all fine but the real secret is the meaning of that #111. (I only thought to find out a couple days ago — apparently I've done 111 kernel builds on this machine.)

this post was submitted on 10 Dec 2025
27 points (100.0% liked)

Linux

10565 readers
368 users here now

A community for everything relating to the GNU/Linux operating system (except the memes!)

Also, check out:

Original icon base courtesy of lewing@isc.tamu.edu and The GIMP

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS