191
top 39 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] AnyOldName3@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

Much more straightforward in British English where d and t are more distinct

[-] NigelFrobisher@aussie.zone 2 points 13 hours ago

Within 50 years all vowel sounds in English will just be schwa.

[-] Pyr_Pressure@lemmy.ca 1 points 13 hours ago
[-] VerilyFemme 5 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago)

Edididid

I've also found that most words become surreal the harder you look at them.

Say the word green like 50 times in a row and tell me that shit's not made up (all words are lmao)

[-] fluckx@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago

Or this monster:

James while John had had had had had had had had had had had a better effect on the teacher

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_while_John_had_had_had_had_had_had_had_had_had_had_had_a_better_effect_on_the_teacher

[-] isyasad@lemmy.world 3 points 17 hours ago

The fact that five of the "hads" are not semantically the word "had" but rather a quotation makes this one weaker than "Buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo" imo, though you could argue that Buffalo as a proper noun is also kinda cheating.

[-] Wizard_Pope@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago

The fact that that sentence can even be considered in any way correct is a fucking travesty

[-] alquicksilver@lemmy.world 5 points 17 hours ago

I would argue that, without the punctuation, it's not technically correct. The references to James and John saying "had had," at least, should be in quotes. Additionally, unless broken up with a semicolon or a period before the final four "hads," it's a run-on sentence.

If you change the "hads" that mean provided/said in the context of the sentence (excluding the quoted ones), you could write it as:

James, while John had [said] "had", had [said] "had had"; "had had" had [provided] a better effect on the teacher.

And though it doesn't flow right to me to have James and his action verb split by a phrase about John, I'm not sure that's incorrect. Phrasing it to fix the flow, for me, would be:

While John had [said] "had", James had [said] "had had"; "had had" had [provided] a better effect on the teacher.

[-] Wizard_Pope@lemmy.world 2 points 16 hours ago

I guess. But to me the most baffling thing is such a sentence can even be constructed. Even disregarding the missing punctuation. I don't think I could even get close to this in my native language. Maybe 2 or 3 worda at most and even then probably not.

[-] khepri@lemmy.world 1 points 17 hours ago

Yeah, these are really silly if you can use quotes or like place/person names. Like if my Dad named Had lived in a town called Had Had, and his favorite thing to say was "had had had"...it just becomes like stupid to say that's some crazy example of a grammatical sentence even if it technically is.

[-] MedicPigBabySaver@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

That's plain ol' fucking stupid.

[-] olafurp@lemmy.world 36 points 1 day ago

I think European Union is weird with some accents. It sounds almost like "Europinyinyinyin"

[-] jaycifer@lemmy.world 5 points 22 hours ago

That’s just, like, Europinyin, Man.

[-] alquicksilver@lemmy.world 19 points 1 day ago

I am not sober. I just had far too much fun saying "europinyinyinyin" out loud over and over again, so thank you for that. :)

I think I have some extended family who probably say it similarly to that, too. Probably the ones from the deep south.

[-] olafurp@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

I'm happy you like it, it's been stuck in my brain for months and I still think it's a bit funny.

[-] remon@ani.social 8 points 1 day ago
[-] AnyOldName3@lemmy.world 2 points 1 hour ago

I'm glad to see someone's made this because it's been bouncing around in my head for ages but I've never got around to putting it together and letting it out.

[-] Looseygoosey@lemmy.world 4 points 23 hours ago

So is.. "and Harry pocketed it."

[-] danekrae@lemmy.world 24 points 1 day ago
[-] samus12345@sh.itjust.works 3 points 15 hours ago

All right, all right, don't hurt yourself!

[-] Socialjusticewarrior@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I know a sound engineer named "ed". And he does a lot of "editing".

Who changed the vocals? "Ed edited it"

Thats sounds crazy

[-] DempstersBox@lemmy.world 1 points 18 hours ago

semantic saturation before you're done saying it

[-] TheLeadenSea@sh.itjust.works 15 points 1 day ago

Now that's a shower thought I like!

It did, didn't it?

[-] Krudler@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago
[-] gigachad@piefed.social 4 points 1 day ago

I salivated so hard trying to pronounce that word the whole metro is looking at me now

[-] notreallyhere@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

maybe you should edit it

[-] Multiplexer@discuss.tchncs.de 8 points 1 day ago

Let me also introduce you to the concept of tongue twisters.

Or, to come to the point:
"Lesser leather never weathered wetter weather better."

[-] falseWhite@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

Edi de de ded

[-] Chais@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 day ago
[-] digger@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 day ago
[-] Chais@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 day ago

I think Stephen Fry famously tripped over this one.

[-] Pika@rekabu.ru 1 points 23 hours ago

Eddie Teddie

[-] hakase@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 day ago

The one I always heard was "Dead-headed Ed edited it".

[-] samus12345@sh.itjust.works 1 points 15 hours ago

Zed's dead, baby, Zed's dead.

[-] tomiant@piefed.social 2 points 1 day ago

Also "clothes".

Klo-dthy-sys.

[-] embed_me@programming.dev 1 points 1 day ago

A D-Day tit

[-] TheFunkyMonk@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

I actually kinda like how it feels to say.

this post was submitted on 02 Dec 2025
191 points (100.0% liked)

Showerthoughts

38359 readers
681 users here now

A "Showerthought" is a simple term used to describe the thoughts that pop into your head while you're doing everyday things like taking a shower, driving, or just daydreaming. The most popular seem to be lighthearted clever little truths, hidden in daily life.

Here are some examples to inspire your own showerthoughts:

Rules

  1. All posts must be showerthoughts
  2. The entire showerthought must be in the title
  3. No politics
    • If your topic is in a grey area, please phrase it to emphasize the fascinating aspects, not the dramatic aspects. You can do this by avoiding overly politicized terms such as "capitalism" and "communism". If you must make comparisons, you can say something is different without saying something is better/worse.
    • A good place for politics is c/politicaldiscussion
  4. Posts must be original/unique
  5. Adhere to Lemmy's Code of Conduct and the TOS

If you made it this far, showerthoughts is accepting new mods. This community is generally tame so its not a lot of work, but having a few more mods would help reports get addressed a little sooner.

Whats it like to be a mod? Reports just show up as messages in your Lemmy inbox, and if a different mod has already addressed the report, the message goes away and you never worry about it.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS