Wow, $207bn by 2030? That's a lot of money to lose! Maybe they should focus on making some actual profit instead.
The government will bail them out. They want the AI surveillance power but don't realize how flawed it is. MK Ultra went on for 20 years before they realized they can't use LSD to mind control people..
This is what the upcoming IMO is for. I wish I was joking
These headlines look like something out of the twilight zone.
If someone made a movie with Donald Trump as president and the whole AI slop in 2010, people would not like it because how unrealistic it is.
Corpo's saying that it's not a bubble in the face of this reminds me of "don't look up" except more malicious.
Someone needs to shut that shit down- ASAP.
Leave it on long enough to fully kill FB, Insta, X, etc. THEN shut it down. We're like 1/2 way there already
a good reminder that fiat currency is literally worthless or else these insane values would be impossible
I'm guessing by fiat you mean government issued currency that is not backed by precious metals but by faith and credit of the issuing government.
They call it fiat because a government just declares how much of it there is.
Blockchain tokens are also fiat in this sense, it's just that the protocol makes the declaration instead of a government.
The other notable difference is that I can buy things with USD or other government currencies. I can't with blockchain tokens. I mean technically I can but they have to be converted first and the popular ones are mostly depictionary so you're deeply disincentivized from using them as currency.
The value of USD comes from people taking it in exchange for goods and services, and the US government taking it as payment for taxes. The value of a Bitcoin comes from people giving you USD for it under the assumption that they can sell it for more USD later. Like a stock, but without the incidental fractional ownership of a corporation with actual capital.
It's a cool concept though, and peer-to-peer digital payment is a good thing, but it cannot function as a store of value without a connection to the material world.
Yeah, im talking about the 207 BILLION US dollars they need to raise. That's an absolutely insane amount of currency if it had to be backed by real things and not "Hey buddy, its the U.S.! nothing could go catastrophically wrong and make this all valueless overnight"
Bitcoin is a pyramid scheme. I mined bitcoin in the early days when you could literally make 1 whole bitcoin in two weeks. The next two weeks I mined 0.3 bitcoins. That's when I realized that it was a scam.
It's not about facilitating peer-to-peer transactions like its proponents claimed. It's about creating a huge money store. The more we use it the more inefficient it gets.
Well that's not true, is it. The values are insane, but sometimes insane situations occur, for a while, until the bubble bursts. Until it does, money is money, and people will spend it on things.
Lol bubble
AI companies make up 1/3 of the current stock market value in the US. Nvidia alone is 7% of the stock market. 92% of 2025 GDP growth in the US has been from AI. They will get bailed out.
I am at a loss to what that would even look like. The bubble popping would mean the admission of AI (LLMs) not having a viable path to usefulness or return, so then what would a bail out even be? Money? To what end, the bubble would have burst and the idea of AI (LLMs) being anything but a money pit would be what makes the bubble burst in the first place. Unless they can show a path to profit (they can't) then the bubble will burst in time or continue in an endless zombie state where they just pretend that somehow AI (LLMs) are the future while burning capital. If it does go into a zombie state (as so many other things in the us market are becoming) then the whole market will just slowly fail as the "hype" turns into disappointment. The only reason that the zombie state would be preferable is that entities need to invest their money somewhere and maybe some other thing in the market can take AI (LLMs) place, but even then why bother bailing out anyone?
Investors could be bailed out. As in you invested 10e11$, so now the government gives you that money back.
Bail out almost anyone that bought tech stocks? Seems unlikely, and it would be basically admitting the end of the stock markets legitimacy. Bailouts tend to be for companies on the edge of collapse.
I think they're too big to bail out at this point
Also, no one wants US bonds right now, so we couldn't borrow our way out of it even if we wanted to. We'd just have to print like a trillion or more dollars all at once
With the financial genius in the white house, I wouldn’t rule that out.
The only possible customer for committed datacenter projects is the US government. the bailout is just buying all the datacenter time... because if not, China wins. Amazon, despite no congressional appropriations yet, has announced $50B datacenter to supply government customers.
China wins what? Except if they already won by far, they have similar AI, with similarly high costs and similarly low value, similarly not worth it. Either they also invest big and will crash just as hard, or they don't and they're just enjoying the show of US suiciding its economy through AI.
If you ever stream cable news in the background during business hours. experts will come on to tell you that if the US doesn't bankrupt itself, then Russia or China wins. The only remaining hope for US economy seems to be to beat China at AI, because it can't beat it at anything else. So, all the money for military, and AI to help military make Skynet, which will mostly be used to ensure establishment can control/kill Americans who don't support Skynet for Israel supremacist rule over the US, is simply a continuation of the tautology of "all US money for militarist US establishment control over all of you", but with more efficient AI.
I wanna say you're wrong, because AI is absolutely not an essential service - like say a water or power company failing would be (or arguably banks). But knowing how deeply the AI tech bros have sucked up to and supported Trump I have to sigh and agree with you that they will probably be rescued from their own stupidity by the taxpayer.
I think you're part right. I think they'll attempt a bailout, but I don't believe Trump's appointments and the administration they're creating have the skill to plan or execute a bailout (or admit to failure enough to identify that they need one in a timely manner)
They're more likely to ram the economy full speed into rock bottom, then blame an outgroup ("the Democrats did this") and pretend nothing could have been done.
they'll try to get bailed out but you would have to bail out so many companies it's not feasible. you cant just bail out one of these companies. they all propped their stock value up on each other, so unless you bail out every company in the tech sector, there will still be trillions of market cap wiped out.
this is a good thing though. it will mostly only affect those who are overly invested in ultimately unprofitable tech, and the rest of us will be able to buy cheap stock for companies affected like Google and Amazon that will be hit massively but obviously are not just gonna go out of business. it's similar to the covid drop. sucked for rich people but for the average person it wasn't a massive issue and even had money making opportunities attached to it as these big companies scrambled.
This is peak bubble type news. AI is becoming rapidly more energy efficient. These events will be looked back on like pets.com reaching hundreds of millions and then dying.
okay lmao
Is it becoming useful yet?
I am a developer. While AI is being marketed as snake oil, the things they can do is astonishing. One example is it reviews code a lot better than human beings. It's not just finding obvious errors but it catches logical error that no human would have caught.
I see people are just forming two groups. Those who thinks AI will solve everything and those who thinks AI is useless. Neither of them are right.
One example is it reviews code a lot better than human beings. It’s not just finding obvious errors but it catches logical error that no human would have caught.
No, it does not.
Source: Open-source contributor who's constantly annoyed by the useless CodeRabbit AI that some open source projects have chosen to use.
And how many errors is it creating that we don't know about? You're using AI to review code but then someone has to review what the AI did because they fuck up.
If humans code something, then humans can troubleshoot and fix it. It's on our level. But how are you going to fix a gigantic complicated tangle of vibe code that AI makes and only AI understands? Make a better AI to fix it? Again and again? Just get the AI to code another system from scratch every month? This shit is not sustainable.
Sometimes. As a tool, not an outsourced human, oracle, or some transcendent companion con artists like Altman are trying to sell.
See how grounded this interview is, from a company with a model trained on peanuts compared to ChatGPT, and that takes even less to run:
…In 2025, with the launch of Manus and Claude Code, we realized that coding and agentic functions are more useful. They contribute more economically and significantly improve people’s efficiency. We are no longer putting simple chat at the top of our priorities. Instead, we are exploring more on the coding side and the agent side. We observe the trend and do many experiments on it.
https://www.chinatalk.media/p/the-zai-playbook
They talk about how the next release will be very small/lightweight, and more task focused. How important gaining efficiency through architecture (not scaling up) is now. They even touch on how their own models are starting to be useful utilities in their workflows, and specifically not miraculous worker replacements.
free access
create account
so it isnt free access. you want my email address and personal data in exchange for this “FrEe” article
Fuck that. #ad
Give us your data or: "$1 for 4 weeks Then $75 per month."
Just $75 . What. The. Fuck.
Technology
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related news or articles.
- Be excellent to each other!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
- Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.