192
submitted 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) by Vanayo@lemmy.world to c/mildlyinteresting@lemmy.world
top 34 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] MummifiedClient5000@feddit.dk 228 points 2 weeks ago

The headline makes it sound like the "in favour" votes were for death penalty, which is not correct. This was a vote for a moratorium - a temporary suspension - of death penalty.

[-] Saltycracker@lemmy.world 33 points 2 weeks ago

This now makes more sense. The headline did a shitty job

[-] trashcroissant 24 points 2 weeks ago

Omg thank you for the explanation I was real worried there for a second

[-] INHALE_VEGETABLES@aussie.zone 9 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I was wondering how we are somehow in favour when we don't even have it.

(op is a cunt Aussie Aussie Aussie oi oi oi)

[-] nkk@programming.dev 4 points 1 week ago

If it makes the United States look good it has to be wrong

[-] y0kai@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 2 weeks ago

Thank you I was very confused seeing many of these countries "against"

[-] Buffalox@lemmy.world 9 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Yes I checked my own country (Denmark) and that is green, and for Denmark it is decidedly illegal to vote for death penalty.
So the vote was probably about making death penalty illegal.

PS:
AFAIK it would be against the Eu treaty to vote for death penalty for ALL EU countries.

The headline in the image clears up the confusion

[-] Ghoelian@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 weeks ago

Not if you don't know what moratorium means (which I didn't before reading the comments)

[-] crypt0cler1c@infosec.pub 3 points 1 week ago

The only people who were confused are the ones who didn't actually read the diagram.

[-] MummifiedClient5000@feddit.dk 5 points 1 week ago

That's no excuse for a misleading headline.

[-] crypt0cler1c@infosec.pub 1 points 1 week ago

It's not misleading at all...

[-] pyre@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

yeah you could delete the labels altogether and I'd still tell you which color is which vote based on who voted.

for future reference, if you see the US voting with the wartorn, economically devastated, despot-ruled or otherwise suffering nations, or if you see the US voting alone or with Israel, then you can bet that they voted for the worst option.

[-] argarath@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

Yeah I came here to ask about this, because Brazil voting in favor of the death penalty when it doesn't have it did set off some alarms for me

[-] Bubbaonthebeach@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 week ago

Thought the same looking up Canada.

[-] aim_at_me@lemmy.nz 1 points 1 week ago

New Zealand and Iceland lol

[-] SalamenceFury@lemmy.world 46 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Seems like the dudes in favor of the death penalty seem to be the usual suspects... And then there's Japan, who straight up went

for no discernible fuckin reason LOL

[-] zloubida@sh.itjust.works 26 points 2 weeks ago

Japan is a country that frequently practices the death penalty.

[-] SalamenceFury@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

I'd think that a country that is extremely safe wouldn't need it anyways...

[-] Goldholz 1 points 1 week ago

Really? I did not know that. Gotta look into that

[-] cerebralhawks@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 1 week ago

You'd think it would involve katanas and beheading or something like you'd see in the movies. Nope, hanging. The Japanese death penalty is typically hanging. Wild, I know. No swords involved. Sorry if this ruins your Monday. I know I was disappointed. Sometimes movies lie, though.

[-] Goldholz 3 points 1 week ago

I didnt know japan still had the death penalty in the first place

[-] amino 5 points 1 week ago

the Japanese state doesn't want to ban the death penalty for the same reason why it celebrates the genocides it committed against its neighbors. it's a very useful tool to keep people passive against its abuses

[-] Goldholz 4 points 1 week ago

Where does japan celebrate it?

[-] amino 3 points 1 week ago
[-] Goldholz 1 points 1 week ago

That is a few people not the entire nation. There are also 25% supporting fashists and nazis in germany, brits that support their empire, russians that also want stalin back, that is different than state supported things like that like in all of china enjoying propaganda against japan, america and south korea from childhood, or in USA where they teach slavery being a good thing and not killing the natives

[-] amino 3 points 1 week ago

ask the average Japanese what they think should be done about the Korean minority of Japan and there you have your answer. xenophobia and chauvinism is commonplace, the fascist PM wouldn't have won the election otherwise

[-] Objection@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 week ago

the Japanese state doesn’t want to ban the death penalty for the same reason why it celebrates the genocides

That is a few people not the entire nation.

That's the prime minister, the head of government.

[-] aeternum 3 points 1 week ago

fun fact: the japanese death row inmates only get 1-2 hours notice of their execution. They wake up every morning not knowing if today is the day they die. I think that'd be so torturous.

[-] amino 1 points 1 week ago

sounds very similar to the American system

[-] PhobosAnomaly@feddit.uk 5 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Death Note would have a gash plot if Japan didn't like a bit of punishment that wasn't compatible with life.

Admittedly, I'd be much more likely to write in the Inconvenient Note so arseholes would find themselves wearing wet socks every day; encounter people who never finish their sentences; have to find a towel lying about the house before showering; or have every underfoot surface feel like a box of Lego.

[-] msage@programming.dev 12 points 2 weeks ago

Belize? Maledives? Trinidad? Wtf?

[-] Hegar@fedia.io 22 points 2 weeks ago

Tiny states use pointless votes like this as a chance to curry favour. Sure, china or the us, we'll vote however you want on this purely symbolic question that will have zero real world impact. Now about that loan...

[-] Goldholz 1 points 1 week ago
this post was submitted on 23 Nov 2025
192 points (100.0% liked)

Mildly Interesting

23678 readers
35 users here now

This is for strictly mildly interesting material. If it's too interesting, it doesn't belong. If it's not interesting, it doesn't belong.

This is obviously an objective criteria, so the mods are always right. Or maybe mildly right? Ahh.. what do we know?

Just post some stuff and don't spam.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS