1199
xkcd #3167: Car Size (imgs.xkcd.com)
submitted 6 months ago by xkcdbot@lemmy.world to c/xkcd@lemmy.world

xkcd #3167: Car Size

Title text:

'They really shouldn't let those small cars drive in traffic. I worry I'm going to kill someone if I hit one! They should have to drive on the sidewalk, safely out of the way.'

Transcript:

Transcript will show once it’s been added to explainxkcd.com

Source: https://xkcd.com/3167/

explainxkcd for #3167

all 49 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] PunnyName@lemmy.world 159 points 6 months ago

Just gonna keep on posting this

[-] eager_eagle@lemmy.world 54 points 6 months ago

I should get an M1 Abrams and write off as a business expense

[-] greedytacothief@lemmy.dbzer0.com 15 points 6 months ago

It would probably be quieter than any of the diesel pickup trucks on the road too!

I remember hearing years ago how the M1 Abrams was a battlefield domination machine that could only be killed by another M1. That was clearly propaganda. Those overweight, overpriced pieces of shit got lit the fuck up after being shipped to Ukraine.

[-] general_kitten@sopuli.xyz 11 points 6 months ago

Russian invasion of ukraine has been the only war in quite a long time where a major power has been fighting against a major power. most other conflicts in many decades have been asymmetrical warfare/symmetrical warfare between outdated militaries. Ukraine has shown that drones are the new thing in warfare, they provide excellent intel, cheap short range pinpoint accurate light artillery. unmatched spotting for heavier artillery and with a bit more expense long range strategic strikes are also possible. With drone warfare MBTs seem to be mostly just the juiciest of targets.

Where previously M1 could be resistant to most attacks, now with drone spotting a direct hit with guided shells can score a direct hit of 155mm shell on top armour of tanks.

[-] ZoteTheMighty@lemmy.zip 38 points 6 months ago

"Your honor, I got the M1 because it was safer than an F150 in my neighborhood with lots of small children."

[-] stelelor@lemmy.ca 10 points 6 months ago

"And here is the data to prove it."

audience gasps

[-] dwemthy@lemmy.world 11 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

~~A 0.2m tall 3 year old??~~ nope, reading comprehension, that's distance

[-] RaivoKulli@sopuli.xyz 6 points 6 months ago

I've driven a Volvo L120H. It had. A pretty great visibility forward, better than my own car (Peugeot 108) lol. But that's due to sitting so high up and only when I took the front loader off. Backwards it had a camera, which I was so jelly of when backing

[-] eager_eagle@lemmy.world 98 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

I'm not even against large vehicles as there are legit use cases for them. I just think they should cost more, be taxed more, and be forbidden to park in certain areas.

[-] balsoft@lemmy.ml 6 points 6 months ago

I just think they should cost more, be taxed more, and be forbidden to park in certain areas.

This won't help with rich assholes who want to drive around an F-950 or whatever, but will make groceries more expensive.

What really needs to happen is to mandate a special license to drive anything over like 2500 kg, and only be able to register it to a business with a valid use-case. To get a "small car" license (B-type), you have to pass an easy theory exam and drive around a tiny sedan around a city for 30 minutes (at least in europe). Trucks have different driving characteristics and are way more dangerous, so the driving tests should be way more difficult too.

Also, maybe this?

Oh, also, ban private cars in cities. Like, completely. Cars are so dangerous that their amount in populated areas needs to be kept to an absolute minimum.

[-] Lemming6969@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago

Should have to register them against a business or something that is licensed for truck use... Then let other people rent them.

[-] lol_idk@piefed.social 61 points 6 months ago

Just a few thousand truck flipping cars on the road might be a good start

[-] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 5 points 6 months ago

Can only drive on well-maintained streets tho.

[-] Zink@programming.dev 3 points 6 months ago

That has traffic-flipping vibes of the upgraded Agency Supercar from the game Crackdown. I like.

[-] FireWire400@lemmy.world 3 points 6 months ago

What's the Lancia logo doing on there?

[-] lol_idk@piefed.social 5 points 6 months ago

Idk I just hot linked some random image on the internet

[-] Poop@lemmy.ca 2 points 6 months ago

I don't know where that's from, but it kinda has Lancia Stratos concept vibes to me.

[-] SlurpingPus@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago
[-] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago

Not to speak of the Lancia Stratos, the original cheese wedge:

cheese

[-] SlurpingPus@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago

That one apparently did well in rally, so I have trouble seeing it as a ‘hugging the ground’ supercar. Even though Porsches and Lambos also were in rally.

[-] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

It's a bit of a misconception. Soft-sprung cars can be hella fast on roads.

But modern supercars are sprung so slow for downforce, to try to turn their bottoms into vacuum cleaners. But (outside of racetracks) its mostly for show and 'sporty feel,' as this downforce doesn't really kick in till like 90mph+. In fact, many racecars are faster around hairpins when sprung looser and higher.

[-] drath@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago

Just passed one of those on my work today. It was LADA 2108 with lowered roof and suspension planted all the way down. Kind of like hybrid of theese two:

It got stuck in a pothole at an intersection...

[-] Credibly_Human@lemmy.world 43 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

This could be solved so many different ways.

The most obvious is getting rid of the stupid CAFE regulations and Chicken tax that basically incentivise the fuck out of making these monstrosities.

The others are less likely to be done in a country like the USA with its 2 party system where the options are conservatism and fascist conservatism.

[-] QuoVadisHomines@sh.itjust.works 26 points 6 months ago

Im sick and tired of this bullshit claim that we can only choose beyween conservatism and fascism. This completely overlooks the Christian fascist theocratic option that is also available to those who really love "freedom".

[-] muusemuuse@sh.itjust.works 10 points 6 months ago

Or just apply the CAFE standards to all vehicles equally, don’t create loopholes that enable this kind of shit.

[-] Benchamoneh@lemmy.dbzer0.com 25 points 6 months ago

May Skeletor suggest: Regulation

[-] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 5 points 6 months ago

Regulation is in cahoots with big car and big oil.

[-] ivanafterall@lemmy.world 17 points 6 months ago

INTRODUCING...GRAVE DIGGER!!!

[-] Mossheart@lemmy.ca 14 points 6 months ago

We're in the "I need to make my headlights brighter than the sun phase". It's just before the spike club panel

[-] ksigley@lemmy.world 13 points 6 months ago

There really is an xkcd for everything.

[-] joyjoy@lemmy.zip 12 points 6 months ago

This is how Mad Max was made.

[-] ceenote@lemmy.world 11 points 6 months ago

Clearly we need to start actively destroying larger vehicles to address this problem.

[-] dantheclamman@lemmy.world 9 points 6 months ago

The thing that really frustrates me is that I can't buy the car I want. I would like a successor to my Chevy Volt but it's become very difficult to find a compact hybrid hatchback in the States. It's basically Prius Prime or bust, and the Prius is not nearly as fun to drive as the Volt.

[-] Snowpix@lemmy.ca 9 points 6 months ago

"We're also going to make cars uglier as they get bigger too. Can't have style, that might distract other drivers"

[-] Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works 4 points 6 months ago

Make sure you get your teenager a massive suv to keep them safe too, nevermind that they are the highest risk drivers and that you've just armed them with something twice as likely to take the life of a pedestrian.

[-] Grandwolf319@sh.itjust.works 4 points 6 months ago

What bugs me about this argument is that the safest thing to do is drive less

[-] balsoft@lemmy.ml 6 points 6 months ago
[-] Bazell@lemmy.zip 2 points 6 months ago

Mad Max time is coming!

[-] esc27@piefed.social 2 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

I've considered installing the equivalent of a spike club behind my vehicle to ward off tailgaters

[-] axexrx@lemmy.world 7 points 6 months ago

I have an artist buddy who has 8 of those bubble guns rigged to the roof of his car, all shooting backwards. (Disguised in 2 giant, colorful 'fun missiles') Makes a pretty decent cloud of bubbles. Easily enough to someone drop back. Always hilarious when he goes through an intersection, and everyone has ro stop like 15 seconds to wait for the bubbles to fall before they can go.

[-] FordBeeblebrox@lemmy.world 3 points 6 months ago

I’ve been thinking about a wicked strong spotlight aimed back, if you want to show me your bright lights up close I’ll show you mine

[-] escapedgoat@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago

I wanted to install a flip down mirror in my back window. If your lights are set right it shouldn't cause any problems for you. If they're not, enjoy your temporary blindness.

[-] Gammelfisch@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago

All while the subprime delinquency rate is getting worse. Yes, AmeriKa, keep buying those gas guzzling fully loaded behemoths that you can barely afford to insure, fuel up and maintain. Don't forget to apply for a 96 month car loan.

[-] DaddleDew@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago

What I want to feel safe on the roads is the Ramp Buggy from GTA Online.

[-] ramius345@sh.itjust.works 1 points 6 months ago
[-] TerraRoot@sh.itjust.works 1 points 6 months ago

I ride motorcycles for everyone else's safety

this post was submitted on 12 Nov 2025
1199 points (100.0% liked)

xkcd

16462 readers
433 users here now

A community for a webcomic of romance, sarcasm, math, and language.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS