206
submitted 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) by PhilipTheBucket@quokk.au to c/politics@piefed.social

It's so fucking weird. I'm accustomed enough to people on Lemmy SWEARING that they aren't allowed to talk about [thing which is only controversial to Fox News boomers] and "they" will delete it if you even try, that I assumed this was crap too, but it seems like it's true.

From the community rules:

R5: No posts about Democratic Socialists or Third Parties

  • No posts about Democratic socialists

Apparently these use this to delete Bernie stuff.

WTF, why would people subject themselves to this

all 28 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] sudo@programming.dev 88 points 6 months ago

This is why Mamdani is so important. Average progressives are going to finally see what socialists have been saying for decades. If you want to move left on anything economical. If you just want to raise the minimum wage $1. The democratic establishment will treat you as the enemy. They will come at you harder than they do the GOP because they can and because you are a threat to them personally.

[-] turdcollector69@lemmy.world 7 points 6 months ago

Corporatist running the 90's playbook is how we ended up where we are.

I'm praying Katie wins in Seattle so it's not just a one off with Mamdani.

[-] ThorrJo@lemmy.sdf.org 59 points 6 months ago

That entire cesspool is astroturfed to the gills for shitbag establishment Democrats, I hear the Gavin 🤢 Newsom 🤢 posts have been wall-to-wall over there for a while now

[-] turdcollector69@lemmy.world 5 points 6 months ago

Gavin is a fucking cancer he represents the same old guard dressed up in new language.

Just like how they appropriated social justice they'll try to appropriate democratic socialism.

[-] Ilixtze@lemmy.ml 39 points 6 months ago

America seriously needs new options for political parties. Or at least a coalition that goes against the "5 corporations in a trench coat pretending it's two political parties." they currently have.

[-] PhilipTheBucket@quokk.au 14 points 6 months ago

I think they should have strong unions as the basic political organizational units, and deal with political parties minimally if at all. I think this whole thing of delegating governance to a particular class of people who are designated as the power-brokers and then choosing which power broker to put in charge is always doomed to failure.

IDK, I'm not an expert on any of this stuff, I have just observed that every new party that comes along to be the insurgent reformist movement that will fix the rot of the previous parties inevitably starts to get rotted itself. The problem is that having a populace that strongly organized and puts effort into making sure things stay on the rails requires that people put that effort in, and they generally won't do that for as long as things are basically comfortable and okay...

[-] Objection@lemmy.ml 4 points 6 months ago

A Marxist perspective would be that mass movements and unionization are the real mechanisms by which ordinary people can wield power. The main reason to engage in electoral politics is because it's what people are invested in and pay attention to, and so it can serve as an avenue to promote a message, but one should not expect to actually produce significant results through bourgeois elections.

Unions in the US are (like the other user said) rare, weak, and often lack solidarity and clarity of vision. But there are new ones popping up and they are gradually gaining in strength. New unions like the ones at Amazon and Starbucks seem to have younger, more energized leadership.

A lot of the problems unions have go back to red scares. Things like, representing newer members and not just seniority, standing together and cooperating with other unions across different industries, trying to make sure the union is welcoming and accommodating to everyone - those sorts of things would get you branded as a communist, whether it was true or not. Way back in the New Deal era, unions got carrots as well as sticks to go in that direction, and then as they became weaker, by the 80's, carrots got a lot more scarce. And so over the past century they were dismantled.

But young people find themselves in this capitalist hellscape and are recognizing the need to organize and stick together and leaving a lot of that baggage behind and starting from scratch. At the same time, it's important to learn from the mistakes of the past, like kicking the commies out of the AFL/CIO in the hopes that the government would see it as a sign of good faith and protect the union's interests. At the end of the day, they're going to pursue their own interests and appeasement doesn't work, especially when it undermines the union's own strength. A new, more inclusive and clear-sighted wave of unionization is our best chance of getting anywhere.

[-] j4k3@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago

Unions are weak here and they are impossible corrupt. I worked with the operating engineers and ibew. Both had the dumbest people I have ever worked with. The job was not difficult but the bitch ass whining, back stabbing, negativity, and gossip were intolerable nonsense. People have no lives in that environment. The only thing that matters is no sticking out, and always showing up no matter how bad things are. It does not matter if it will kill you or everyone else by showing up for work or doing some job. March to your death or get fired and blacklisted by the union hall.

[-] SreudianFlip@sh.itjust.works 5 points 6 months ago

Just want everyone to know that in fact there’s a lot of variety in how unions are run everywhere, including the USA, and an anecdote shouldn’t be universalized.

Big industrial unions seem to be the worst.

I was running a series of interviews with early auto worker union organizers from USA and Canada (they were united at first), and the particular form of corruption that infected the UAW was a kind of takeover by industry management in the late ‘50s, and the old timers I talked to maintained the UAW hadn’t recovered. The CAW, on the other hand, was criticized by members as lacking solidarity with other industries and being too mainstream, though I heard few accusations of corruption.

Divide and conquer has been a long running capitalist strategy.

[-] PhilipTheBucket@quokk.au 2 points 6 months ago

Don't forget being addicted to pills and constantly having your physical health being wrecked and complete disdain for anyone who doesn't want that

Yes I completely agree. A lot of these things need to societal foundations to exist for them in a form that they simply do not in America right now

[-] JargonWagon@lemmy.world 10 points 6 months ago

Just stop going to reddit, and maybe keep this reddit drama in reddit drama focused places.

[-] AlecSadler 9 points 6 months ago

What a shitty platform and a shitty sub.

[-] MedicPigBabySaver@lemmy.world 7 points 6 months ago

Fuck Reddit and Fuck Spez.

[-] Lucky_777@lemmy.world 5 points 6 months ago

Not surprising, glad I left that bitch a long time ago

Any idea when those screenshots were taken? I suppose I'm not going to go on reddit to see what it's at now, but always curious

[-] PhilipTheBucket@quokk.au 2 points 6 months ago

No idea. It's still at 307k right now.

[-] LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

How many people do you see now

Edit: someone pointed it is way higher, which is concerning as well .. -7k +24k in a day... If someone said they were deleting bots, it shows massive investment in accounts after the election loss

[-] HootinNHollerin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 6 months ago

Send them our way

[-] PapaStevesy@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago

Thanks for that super helpful arrow, I had no clue where to look

this post was submitted on 06 Nov 2025
206 points (100.0% liked)

Politics

560 readers
1 users here now

Any politics anywhere in the world. Inevitably it'll be 99% US stuff, but that's not a rule.

This community works differently to how most politics communities work. It has strict rules designed to facilitate productive discussion. You can be rude, to a point, but you can't participate in bad faith:

The idea is to make the discussion productive. Let's see how it works. Maybe this is a fool's errand but IDK how any set of moderation could be worse than lemmy.world.

Other misc rules:

founded 7 months ago
MODERATORS