512
Mexico sues sexual predators, US elects them
The difference between a third world country and Mexico
A sexual predator in Mexico was emboldened enough to grope the president in front of reporters.
And E. Jean Carroll did sue (and won a settlement from) Trump for sexual assault.
Let's not do the "every nation is better than the US about everything now" thing.
Gangs are illegal in Mexico and corruption is something to be fought against
ICE gets 100k salary to beat up and kidnap people with masks in US
In capitalist America, president gropes you!
In another thread about this episode people were saying the entire incident was staged by her to distract from other news. I got downvoted to hell for suggesting that it was anti-woman to believe such a conspiracy theory rather than acknowledge that a woman got groped.
The fact that she’s pressing charges should put the conspiracy theory to bed. Why would she take it into a courtroom for more attention if it was just a stunt to manipulate the press that week? I’m sure someone will double down on conspiracy theories to come up with an answer to that question…
Sexism is believing it is okay to grope a woman and commit sexual assault.
Casual sexism is automatically assuming a woman (in power or not) who brings legal action against someone for committing sexual assault is doing so for attention or some other false ulterior motive.
Yes, thank you. It’s less overt of an assault on women then physically groping them, but it’s perhaps more insidious, because an environment of ignore-and-excuse puts ALL women everywhere at risk
And its happening right here, right now. Fucking God damn. Sexism is still rampant in 2025.
I think it's that #believeallwomen is a hard hill to die on. Any internet troll is a Google search away from proof that you shouldn't blindly believe all women. It just reminds me of when Joe Biden had some allegations against him, and he got caught between a rock and a hard place: believe all women, just not this one.
Instead of belief, it's about respect. Whether true or not, any accusation should be taken seriously and avoid sensationalism. It's also about understanding your role. It's easy for me to say all of this about a situation thousands of miles away; I have an infinitely small role. If it happens closer to home, to someone you know, belief may be a part of that role, but it still needs to come from a place of respect and understand of the situation. If religion is any example, blind belief doesn't help anything but fuel division.
It’s not about blindly believing all women all the time. It’s about believing them by default, and as you say, taking them seriously. In this case they were willing to discard the evidence of their eyes in favor of some pretty far fetched conspiracy theory, and considered anyone who didn’t agree to be some naive idiot. And they paradoxically claimed to take sexual assault very seriously, while doing this. SMH
Not dismissing the idea that it might be for real, but random man being able to grope the literal President sounds kinda sus.
I'm not super into Mexican politics, but doesn't she have guard on duty to prevent just that?
I’m glad you don’t automatically dismiss that she was actually assaulted (!!!) I mean that’s pretty much the bare minimum everyone should do. This was captured on video. You can view it for yourself. Her guards did intervene, just a step too late. That does not mean she staged it for attention.
But everyone would love to feel smart and come up with some alternative theory of what happened rather than contend with the sordid facts.
She had guards with her. She was originally supposed to be driven around, but she decided to walk. Not sure how they got so close but this wasnt a planned trip.
load more comments
(5 replies)
Fucking disgusting, the audacity of that man is disgusting.
They should send him to America, he has solid change in a government position. /s
The woman president of Mexico gets groped and Lemmy still manages to post 5 comments only about US politics. Why must you shoehorn in that shitty country into every unrelated topic on Lemmy?
They are the neighboring county and the topic is sexual predators.
it's the US defaultism, most users are from there, that bothers me too
You know it was staged, right? Everyone knows it's a distraction from this. It isn't the first time she does something to distract from the current events....
I know I'm going to get downvoted for this but it's infuriating to live in México and you can't criticize our government because all of you love that an empowered woman is in control.... Most of México is a mess right now, cartels are in control, just last weekend I had a trip to my mother's inherited grandmas house and in a small town and after a 6 hour trip we just went back because they control the town.
My mom said she rather lose her childhood home than our lives....
I'm sure you have ample evidence to back up this claim.
Nah dude, he doesn't need proof, she's a woman, they always lie for favors, even as the president. /srs
You mean besides the news articles I linked? The ones with photos?.... No I don't.
Edit: and because it's usual for presidents to walk the streets without bodyguard.... And more after one politician just got killed....
Se poco y nada de la politica mexicana, pero me acuerdo de alguna vez haber chateado con un mexicano que me dijo algo en las lineas de "te das cuenta de qué partido es el que está con los narcos, porque es el que gana las elecciones".
No se que tan real es o no eso, pero si es así, te entenderia que la presidente ande sin guardia.
Para mí todos son iguales, solo que tal vez ahora me afecta más directamente con mi jefecita adorada en este momento. No les creo a ninguno.
For English speakers: to me all political parties are the same, maybe just this time it affects more directly with my grandma's house. I don't trust them
What are you talking about?? You clearly don’t live in Mexico and just hear US propaganda/ Telemundo/ tv azteca which is the same.
- This wasn’t staged. Sadly there are men like this in Mexico
- carlos M. tragedy is begin blow out proportion by the media to decrease approval and have the elite funded parties rise again or use it as an excuse so the use can US can invade Mexico.
This shit happened way more in previous governments and never heard about it.
Guey como fregados dices que soy gringo o pocho? CTM
Es suficiente español para ti?
Y déjame adivinar, Calderón robo más? Chaíto
load more comments
(1 replies)
As we all know, women are never assaulted and only use it for cover ups.
Dunno who said that, I didn't. Don't put words in my mouth.
"Look, a woman is using this for benefiting herself, not to get any justice." Is what you argued.
Are the federales lacking resources or intent? That assassination was clearly a message, I admittedly don’t know a lot about Mexican politics but is it possible to defeat the cartels or is it a competition of monopoly?
Morena, her political party, is very friendly to the drug cartels, AMLO (our last president) went to greet Chapo's mom for example. He's the one that created morena.
His ideology was "let them work and they won't mess with you" .
Idk why the quotations since this was never said.
Yes cartels (which are funded by the US) do have a big influence in Mexico, but no MORENA isn’t friendly to the drug cartel.
They understand that going into blood battles against them doesn’t improve it. ( which happened in previous governments) Instead they are targeting the root cause like:
- taking 11 million Mexicans out of poverty,
- increased salaries
- education grants
- infrastructure, etc.
their actual slogan is: “abrazos no balazos” which means hugs instead of bullets.
They understand that most don’t joins cartels out of fun, but need.
load more comments
(7 replies)
The late mayor also told a group of women in his city that, if their children were in the crime, "do not squeal if they are killed by the government in a confrontation."
Imagine stanning for Milei like figures. Rest in piss mayor.
load more comments
(1 replies)
load more comments
(1 replies)
No body guards? How would someone even get this close (didn't see the video)?
That was my question after seeing the video.... and it's mexico... no bodyguards? And please notice that I mean no offense to mexico and that I'm questioning this as a latin.
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 06 Nov 2025
512 points (100.0% liked)
World News
51083 readers
770 users here now
A community for discussing events around the World
Rules:
-
Rule 1: posts have the following requirements:
- Post news articles only
- Video links are NOT articles and will be removed.
- Title must match the article headline
- Not United States Internal News
- Recent (Past 30 Days)
- Screenshots/links to other social media sites (Twitter/X/Facebook/Youtube/reddit, etc.) are explicitly forbidden, as are link shorteners.
- Blogsites are treated in the same manner as social media sites. Medium, Blogger, Substack, etc. are not valid news links regardless of who is posting them. Yes, legitimate news sites use Blogging platforms, they also use Twitter, Facebook, and YouTube and we don't allow those links either.
-
Rule 2: Do not copy the entire article into your post. The key points in 1-2 paragraphs is allowed (even encouraged!), but large segments of articles posted in the body will result in the post being removed. If you have to stop and think "Is this fair use?", it probably isn't. Archive links, especially the ones created on link submission, are absolutely allowed but those that avoid paywalls are not.
-
Rule 3: Opinions articles, or Articles based on misinformation/propaganda may be removed. Sources that have a Low or Very Low factual reporting rating or MBFC Credibility Rating may be removed.
-
Rule 4: Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, anti-religious, or ableist will be removed. “Ironic” prejudice is just prejudiced.
-
Posts and comments must abide by the lemmy.world terms of service UPDATED AS OF OCTOBER 19 2025
-
Rule 5: Keep it civil. It's OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It's NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
-
Rule 6: Memes, spam, other low effort posting, reposts, misinformation, advocating violence, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.
-
Rule 7: We didn't USED to need a rule about how many posts one could make in a day, then someone posted NINETEEN articles in a single day. Not comments, FULL ARTICLES. If you're posting more than say, 10 or so, consider going outside and touching grass. We reserve the right to limit over-posting so a single user does not dominate the front page.
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
Lemmy World Partners
News !news@lemmy.world
Politics !politics@lemmy.world
World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world
Recommendations
For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/
- Consider including the article’s mediabiasfactcheck.com/ link
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS