547
I like Python def (lemmy.world)
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Reinsch@feddit.de 81 points 2 years ago

Ewww default exports. Explicit named exports are better! And so it begins

[-] Bishma@discuss.tchncs.de 20 points 2 years ago

How very dare you share my opinion!

[-] ShortFuse@lemmy.world 17 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

PascalCase default exports for Classes

camelCase named exports for functions

ALL_CAPS named exports for constants

[-] the_beber@lemm.ee 42 points 2 years ago
[-] Andrew15_5@mander.xyz 33 points 2 years ago

How about some fn instead?

[-] MultipleAnimals@sopuli.xyz 16 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)
pub async fn foo() -> Pin>>>>>

oh fuck commonmark cant display the syntax :( well anyone who has done async rust can imagine

[-] flashgnash@lemm.ee 5 points 2 years ago

p a f fn(){}

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Xylight@lemmy.xylight.dev 12 points 2 years ago

these puns are getting funcy

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] sbv@sh.itjust.works 28 points 2 years ago

fun is the punchable face of keywords. I don't know why, but I hate it.

[-] pivot_root@lemmy.world 14 points 2 years ago

Oh, you're no fun.

^I'll see myself out.^

[-] mvirts@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago

For me it's friend

[-] SubArcticTundra@lemmy.ml 5 points 2 years ago

I prefer good old def

[-] autokludge@programming.dev 11 points 2 years ago

How about some (defun)?

[-] darcy@sh.itjust.works 5 points 2 years ago

better than function

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] boletus@sh.itjust.works 37 points 2 years ago

Python is fine as a language I guess

But python programmers give it a bad name. I've never seen "well written" python code, it's always shit that's been thrown together cos it works.

[-] herrvogel@lemmy.world 18 points 2 years ago

I use python exclusively when I want to quickly throw some shit together that nobody's ever gonna spend any time maintaining, so that tracks.

[-] MrBlueSkies@feddit.uk 17 points 2 years ago

It badly needs strong typing. And braces.

[-] Anahkiasen 6 points 2 years ago

Doesn't Python 3 have types? I've seen a few well typed codebases and it really made the code much easier to understand. Or is it just that it's not checking them strongly enough?

[-] kaesaecracker@leminal.space 5 points 2 years ago

The type annotations are just fancy comments. They do not do anything at runtime. If you have a function that takes an int someone can still pass in a list or anything else.

[-] boletus@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 years ago

The main advantage of typing for me is static linting.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] boletus@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 years ago

I think python is good as it is for what it can do, mostly because I have no reason to use it.

What we need is lua with types!

[-] Shush@reddthat.com 4 points 2 years ago

Have you heard of Typescript-to-lua? I used to do Dota modding (which is in lua) with TSTL and it works great!

You write TS code (using Typescript syntax that includes types) and it is compiled into lua.

Wonder if that could be an alternative that can work for you.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] funkless_eck@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 years ago

just put int_ or str_ in front of your variables

problem solved 😌

[-] redcalcium@lemmy.institute 17 points 2 years ago

When the grey beards wake up they're going to be fuming

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 24 Sep 2023
547 points (100.0% liked)

Programmer Humor

36902 readers
104 users here now

Post funny things about programming here! (Or just rant about your favourite programming language.)

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS