You don’t build a throne room to yourself if you are leaving. The minute the SC gave him universal immunity - it was over. He’s not leaving because he might face a consequence. He will remain in power until he leaves, in a box.
This was all avoidable.
No fucking shit. He has merch.
Well the merch is just a joke to own the libs!
He can't legally be elected president, but he could be made speaker of the house and the elected president and vice president could both resign (or be eliminated) making him president.
Or, Congress could change the order of succession such that Trump becomes president without being speaker of the house.
I would hope the various numbnuts I know who claim he isn't trying to become king figure out they were wrong before it comes to pass.
As far as I can see, he could just run as V.P. to some candidate whose entire platform is "I will resign straight after being sworn in." A disturbing number of people would vote for them just to "own the libs".
No, you have to be eligible to be president to be VP. It's just as illegal as running as president.
Ah, OK, that's good to know. So, speaker of the house is the most likely under current arrangements. I wonder if thaat's the plan, or if they're going to try to change the rules, or if they're just going to ignore the rules completely.
from what I recall, it's written in a way that even in that circumstance they wouldn't be able to become president, it would move down to the next person, but he absolutely could be speaker of the house.
Here's a thought...
Let's say someone - like JD Vance - wins the presidency on an 'I'll resign on Day 1 and nominate Speaker Trump to take my place' ticket (assuming the succession rules are changed too).
Why would he? Why would someone willingly give up the unchecked power of the most powerful person on the planet?
We've seen just how completely broken the U.S. is now, effectively having a king thanks to the Supreme Court. The first 'official' act of this new President, before they chose to resign, would be to release the Epstein files, arrest Trump, and put him on trial for all of his crimes.
That way they keep all of this unchecked power to themselves.
You're asking why?
Because Vance is a fucking cuck thats why.
I think if "JD" "Vance" were to actually do something like that, he'd have to watch out for the actual Deep State that would be aching to do a JFK to him because of their absurd loyalty to Orange Jesus.
That's what I would've thought...
Though would the vehemently anti-paedophile Deep State suddenly forget about Trump when the Epstein Files are released?
I'm genuinely not so sure their blind faith in Orange Jesus will remain resolute when even MTG is demanding their release.
In (I think) the 12th amendment, it states that anyone who is ineligible to run for president is also ineligible to be vice president. While it's not necessarily clear, I imagine that'd also mean that anyone ineligible to run for president would not be eligible for any position that would put them in line of succession for president
He will be the first third term president. He will not need to be elected
If it does happen, he would be the second.
FDR beat him to it, but legitimately.
FDR was elected for 4 terms.
Exactly. It makes him the first President elected to four terms and he is also the first President elected to three terms.
Yes, I forgot about FDR
Trump will leave office when he’s dead.
Might want to check out FDR.
Oh shit I forgot all about FDR.
I'd love someone to ask Bannon off the record if he really thinks Taco's health suggests he'll make it another 3.5 years.
Just because as a person is having mental decline, and possibly a stroke, doesn’t mean they can’t be kept alive for decades with the best medicine money can buy
The Golden Throne doesn't exist... yet.
lol, I was just about to say I am pretty sure Trump has a golden toilet
Or continue to release ai videos until they get bored of it.
no thanks. he's in it for himself
politics
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:

- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News