215

House Democrats, disturbed by what they see as the destruction of a historic landmark, are demanding answers about the forthcoming White House ballroom. In a letter to President Trump, a trio of Democrats expressed concern about "transparency, funding priorities, the physical integrity of the White House and the ethical integrity of the Administration it houses."

Rep. Robert Garcia, the top Democrat on the House Oversight Committee, along with Democratic Reps. Yassamin Ansari of Arizona and Jared Huffman of California, wrote that decisions about the ballroom addition "were made in complete secrecy" and without "public disclosure or proper consultation."

This week, demolition crews began dismantling the White House East Wing to make room for the privately funded ballroom, which is expected to exceed 90,000 square feet. Mr. Trump said the cost of the building had ballooned to $300 million, up from its original estimate of $200 million in July.

top 13 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] newthrowaway20@lemmy.world 53 points 4 days ago

Aw shit! A sternly worded letter!

[-] CouncilOfFriends@slrpnk.net 14 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

There is no way Trump will survive the concern and finger wagging. Mission accomplished, everyone.

[-] Asafum@feddit.nl 5 points 3 days ago

"Trump SLAMED by letter! President Trump was DEMOLISHED by harsh words! The Democrats ANNIHILATIED Trump with finger wag!"

[-] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago
[-] TheMadCodger@piefed.social 3 points 3 days ago

Well yeah, he learnt his lesson after he was impeached and Susan Collins furrowed her eyebrows.

[-] kbobabob@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 3 days ago

Maybe they should chain themselves to the building? What are you expecting?

[-] Asafum@feddit.nl 19 points 3 days ago

Incoming: "Get the details from your mom!"

Truly professional, adult, government.

[-] Steve@startrek.website 4 points 3 days ago

We discovered that the toilets were too small for your mom, we need another $20m for custom gold your mom size giant toilets

[-] lolola 10 points 3 days ago

This event inspired me to donate a bit to ProPublica. Something tells me we're more likely to get answers about this in a long-format investigative journalism piece than from a congressional committee.

Something also tells me we won't get answers for a long time.

[-] crandlecan@mander.xyz 13 points 4 days ago

Oh no!!

🤡

[-] jaybone@lemmy.zip 5 points 3 days ago

I bet that shit won’t be done before he’s out of office.

[-] Zizzy 3 points 3 days ago

Out of office? Youre optimistic

this post was submitted on 23 Oct 2025
215 points (100.0% liked)

politics

26179 readers
2135 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS