329

My schools entire assignment system is out today.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Triumph@fedia.io 198 points 2 weeks ago

You'd be hard pressed to find an online service that isn't associated with AWS in some way.

[-] kescusay@lemmy.world 113 points 2 weeks ago

Sadly, there are some who don't even know it, because they're buying services from someone else that buys them from someone else that buys them from Amazon. So they're currently wondering what the fuck is even going on, since they thought they weren't using AWS.

[-] darvocet@infosec.pub 6 points 2 weeks ago

Well those people are fucking idiots.

[-] Flatfire@lemmy.ca 36 points 2 weeks ago

That's not really fair, I think. Smaller organizations are especially dispositioned here. Think small businesses, charities, local municipal services, etc. Small IT budgets, low staff (if any) and just enough to pad out a subscription cost to a service provider that fits their needs.

AWS is an incredibly low cost solution, and it's probably where most of these low cost services point themselves at when building platforms at scale. Not everyone can build and maintain a datacentre or home server for their every need.

This isn't to say that there are definitely idiots who pad their resume by chanting a prayer to SaaS and boasting about having moved their company to the "cloud" via a cheap and unreliable AWS rehoster, before failing upwards though.

load more comments (8 replies)
[-] nymnympseudonym@piefed.social 21 points 2 weeks ago

I'm pretty sure most of Azure (Microsoft), OCI (Oracle), and GCP (Google) have all been fine.

Bezos is a craven beast but I don't see many companies above with CEOs that I'd feel comfortable babysitting my teenage daughter

[-] Nighed@feddit.uk 16 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

The company I work for is an Azure shop. However, our provider for customer 2fa tokens uses AWS.... So still in trouble.

[-] SatansMaggotyCumFart@piefed.world 14 points 2 weeks ago

Once Larry Ellison owns TikTok he's going to be babysitting all the teenagers and a whole bunch of other people!

[-] Marshezezz 6 points 2 weeks ago

I really hope that super villain wannabe croaks out real soon

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Triumph@fedia.io 7 points 2 weeks ago

Sure, but online services can certainly leverage multiple modules, from multiple companies, hosted in multiple places. So maybe your site mostly works fine, but a key aspect of it is broken.

[-] nymnympseudonym@piefed.social 6 points 2 weeks ago

from multiple companies

See the above post from the Azure shop ... that uses AWS for 2FA tokens

You want to add multiple companies in parallel as alternates/failovers, not in serial where any one failure blocks the whole flow

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] higgsboson@piefed.social 7 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Walmart.com would likely work fine, as they are rabidly anti-Amazon, especially AWS. They don't even want their SaaS vendors using AWS under the covers for them.

[-] bamboo 9 points 2 weeks ago

Can confirm, about 10 years ago, the company I worked for migrated to AWS, and I managed the transition. We planned everything meticulously so that there would be no downtime, and used it as excuse to fix a lot of tech debt. No one was supposed to even notice the cutover, and when we did it, I expected the only feedback to be that things seemed faster and were working as expected. A few hours later, we get a complaint from an Account Manager for Walmart that they can't access the platform at all. There was a lot of confusion and back and forth, turns out their IT department had an allow list or something in the corporate DNS to not resolve to AWS owned IPs unless approved. We eventually got them to add our domain to their allowlist, but it seemed insane that they would spend the effort to implement and maintain that level of control.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] betterdeadthanreddit@lemmy.world 80 points 2 weeks ago

I brought down all my department's services to take a day off and blame it on Amazon. Next year when negotiating a raise/budget increase, I'll point to this incident and take credit for migrating us off AWS after six months of in-person training classes (either in places I haven't visited or would like to see again) and another six months of hard work in the office (napping in the server room).

2026 is looking pretty good already and I definitely won't regret tempting fate by saying that.

[-] mr_pip@discuss.tchncs.de 20 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

great idea! show us your nap setup! sitting or lying down?

[-] vegals@lemmy.world 18 points 2 weeks ago
[-] HeyJoe@lemmy.world 11 points 2 weeks ago

It's sad that none of these people you deal with don't know what service they use or vendors they deal with? That sounds fantastic for you, scary for everyone else.

[-] slazer2au@lemmy.world 60 points 2 weeks ago

The really stupid thing is that even if you weren't in AWS east us 1 you were still boned because that is where AWS does it's service authentication.

[-] nymnympseudonym@piefed.social 18 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

I love it when Cloud companies pretend there are "serverless" services that are "location-transparent"

You know, they sell this crap to governments and have to follow compliance regimes like FedRAMP but yet... this happens

But the only way to do this is to have a CSO willing to invest heavy in red-teaming -- for attacks of every kind the team can brainstorm -- and a CEO willing to spend the $$ and attention to get their recommendations implemented.

[-] Endymion_Mallorn@kbin.melroy.org 56 points 2 weeks ago

I just want AWS, Azure, Google, & Cloudflare to go down at the same time.

And maybe stay down.

[-] ininewcrow@lemmy.ca 29 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

If a nation wants to go to war with the US ... this is how they do it, they just shut down one, two or all of these systems down and watch the country go crazy. It wouldn't destroy the country, just disrupt it enough to make them go nuts and then do more things to them in other ways.

It's amazing when you think about it, first the US invested in heavily defending and arming itself in the 60s, 70s and 80s ... then it spent billions more in the 90s and 2000s to try to come up with ever more inventive ways to screw itself from the inside.

[-] JoMiran@lemmy.ml 28 points 2 weeks ago

No. Everyone always focuses on the flashy stuff like datacenters but the truth is that the most vulnerable, overtaxed, and underfunded weak-spot for the United States is the electric grid.

[-] ironhydroxide@sh.itjust.works 16 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

I'm pretty convinced that if we did have a complete grid failure, we wouldn't be able to complete a cold start.

Too many people would be pushing for their section to be started first so they could short the market first.

Edit: my proofreading sucks

[-] Marshezezz 7 points 2 weeks ago

The American dream

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Endymion_Mallorn@kbin.melroy.org 16 points 2 weeks ago

Yup. Most of our core electrical infrastructure is over 100 years old now. And thanks to a combination of NIMBYism, profiteering, and the anti-nuclear brigades, we're not likely to see that change any time soon.

[-] Goodlucksil@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 2 weeks ago

Note to self: Sabotage the US' electric grid.

[-] YoSoySnekBoi@kbin.earth 8 points 2 weeks ago

Which in turn would take down the datacenters too, so same effect, just more severe

[-] Xaphanos@lemmy.world 7 points 2 weeks ago

Most data centers are backed up by generators.

[-] ininewcrow@lemmy.ca 10 points 2 weeks ago

.. that run on fuel for a limited time ... once the fuel runs out, the data centres go down

Need to transport more fuel there? Can't because the entire system is down.

[-] Psionicsickness@reddthat.com 7 points 2 weeks ago

All*

And UPSs.

[-] justsomeguy@lemmy.world 10 points 2 weeks ago

I feel like you got it backwards. Letting them run is doing more damage than turning them off would.

[-] Endymion_Mallorn@kbin.melroy.org 7 points 2 weeks ago

If the way someone goes to war with the US is by freeing us from the overly-centralized landlords of the Internet, maybe whoever they are isn't so bad.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] WhatGodIsMadeOf@feddit.org 34 points 2 weeks ago

We all fund the devil pretending we don't know.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] taiyang@lemmy.world 21 points 2 weeks ago

Same, Canvas is perhaps the most used Learning Management System in the US and they apparently are entirely hosted on AWS East. The real kicker is I had my students midterm due date literally today for two classes. I've been swamped with panic emails (and I made clear my due dates aren't even that important when there isn't a national outage lol).

My head canon is someone wished for a miracle due date extension somewhere in the country and they monkey's pawed AWS into non existence.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Zikeji@programming.dev 18 points 2 weeks ago

I wouldn't look at it that way. Even companies not leveraging AWS directly will be impacted.

[-] nymnympseudonym@piefed.social 6 points 2 weeks ago

Especially Microsoft, Google, and Oracle, who are all at this very moment probably sending out sales droids in vast numbers

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] 9tr6gyp3@lemmy.world 6 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Sounds like those companies are not considering the capabilities of their supply chain then.

[-] popcornpizza 10 points 2 weeks ago

In my country, a lot of the non-traditional bank apps are still down, with millions of people having lost access to their money. Can't even buy groceries, pay the bills, or anything.

[-] obsidianfoxxy7870 8 points 2 weeks ago

Yep, I just love how one service provider goes down and way to much of the internet goes down with it.

[-] hperrin@lemmy.ca 8 points 2 weeks ago

My wife and I are at Disneyland today, and their site is down. xD

[-] dumplingry@lemmy.world 6 points 2 weeks ago

fr i cant believe clash royale is a part of that

[-] bochy992@lemmy.ml 6 points 2 weeks ago

I haven't been able to use Flickr for 10 hours. I'm so mad

[-] Furbag@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] MrEff@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago

EBSCO was down. Ask me how my dissertation writing progressed today...

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 20 Oct 2025
329 points (100.0% liked)

Showerthoughts

37999 readers
579 users here now

A "Showerthought" is a simple term used to describe the thoughts that pop into your head while you're doing everyday things like taking a shower, driving, or just daydreaming. The most popular seem to be lighthearted clever little truths, hidden in daily life.

Here are some examples to inspire your own showerthoughts:

Rules

  1. All posts must be showerthoughts
  2. The entire showerthought must be in the title
  3. No politics
    • If your topic is in a grey area, please phrase it to emphasize the fascinating aspects, not the dramatic aspects. You can do this by avoiding overly politicized terms such as "capitalism" and "communism". If you must make comparisons, you can say something is different without saying something is better/worse.
    • A good place for politics is c/politicaldiscussion
  4. Posts must be original/unique
  5. Adhere to Lemmy's Code of Conduct and the TOS

If you made it this far, showerthoughts is accepting new mods. This community is generally tame so its not a lot of work, but having a few more mods would help reports get addressed a little sooner.

Whats it like to be a mod? Reports just show up as messages in your Lemmy inbox, and if a different mod has already addressed the report, the message goes away and you never worry about it.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS