I think it is just a matter of time for the disturbing stuff to circulate. If people can create their darkest desires they will.

Then cue debates and political campaigns about AI in general and if we should allow anyone or anything to create depraved images, pronographic or not.

Once again pornography is setting unrealistic standards for women.

Great, more man made horrors beyond comprehension

if xkcd was right about jpeggy porn being niche, i'd bank on terrible AI porn becoming a niche in the future too.

🥵

SFW content in an NSFW website. Nice!

I'd throw a hotdog down that corridor, if you know what I mean.

But then who will you treat like shit?

The actual scary use case for AI porn is that if you can get 50 or more photos of the same person's face (almost anyone with an Instagram account), you can train your own LoRA model to generate believable images of them, which means you can now make "generic looking" porn with pretty much any person you want to see in it. Basically the modern equivalent of gluing cutouts of your crush's face onto the Playboy centerfold, only with automated distribution over the Internet...

Little known fact - there's more the one person out there, and, those extra people have lots of differing opinions!

Some things I was able to put my finger on after looking at a bunch of the images in the feed:

• It doesn't do skin well, treating it more like a smooth plastic than a surface with pores, wrinkles, and fine hairs.
• It doesn't understand lighting, so shadows don't agree with highlights or even each other.
• It doesn't understand anatomy. A lot of the images were fine in this regard but others had misplaced muscles, bones, and impossible limb positioning/truncation.
• It has no idea how to draw vaginas. Nipples are also not well understood, though it does better on average with those. They still look more like a plastic than skin, but most of them were passable at least, while I didn't see a single vagina that looked even close to right.

Well, to develop such a service, you need training data, i.e. lots of real child pornography in your possession.

Legality for your viewers will also differ massively around the world, so your target audience may not be very big.

And you probably need investors, which likely have less risky projects to invest into.

Well, and then there's also the factor of some humans just not wanting to work on disgusting, legal grey area stuff.

CivitAI is a pretty perverted site at the best of times. But there's a disturbing amount of age adjustment plugins to make images of children on the same site they have plugins to make sex acts. It's clear some people definitely are.