445
submitted 5 days ago by Mog_Spawn@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] robocall@lemmy.world 111 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

The article can't be bothered to include any pictures of the stolen jewels

edit: I think these are the stolen jewels

[-] lightnsfw@reddthat.com 35 points 4 days ago

I'll keep an eye out for them.

[-] D_C@sh.itjust.works 45 points 5 days ago

"Why do you think these are the stolen items?"
"Well, for one, I just took these pictures in my cellar of stolen jewels..."

[-] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 2 points 3 days ago

I saw the top piece in another article, and I heard about all the sapphires. This is my first time seeing them, and they are unbelievable. It looks like they're the right works.

There was also a crown that got dropped in the street and took some damage. At least it was recovered.

I once read a book by a retired jewel thief whose statutes of limitations has all run out, and he said that that the first thing he did was break down the jewelry, sort the stones, and melt down the settings. Then he'd fence them ASAP. Always. So all that jewelry he stole, all that sentimental value, is gone forever.

These works are priceless not only for their craftsmanship and beauty, but their historic significance as well. They were literally created to be fit for a King, or Queen.

Unfortunately, the intrinsic value of those old, perfect stones on today's market, far outweighs their historic or artistic value. There is likely some Sociopathic Oligarchs who think those stones would look better in modern settings, and be better served by being worn around, and not just put on display in some museum where nobody goes.

That's a lot of loose stones, some of them very large, and some small. There are enough to make many, many pieces of jewelry. Perhaps there will be a bit of a black market among jewelers who cater to the very wealthy, to sell works that includes a Louvre stone or two.

[-] melsaskca@lemmy.ca 11 points 4 days ago

These trinkets will go to a very rich collector, not through your typical "fence the goods" path. I'd check Mar-a-Lago as a first step.

[-] FaceDeer@fedia.io 78 points 5 days ago

Last headline I saw about this said 7 minutes. Pretty soon the thieves will be reaching back in time to grab these things.

[-] WhiskyTangoFoxtrot@lemmy.world 18 points 5 days ago

Maybe they're hoping that, by posting the wrong figure, they'll compel the thieves to correct them, thereby revealing themselves.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] unphazed@lemmy.world 31 points 5 days ago

I never understood stealing high value items. That shit is gonna be so hot it'd take a deep network to fence.

[-] flightyhobler@lemmy.world 44 points 4 days ago

You're assuming they don't have a customer yet.

[-] ChaoticEntropy@feddit.uk 4 points 4 days ago

Indeed, it's not like this was opportunism.

[-] Buddahriffic@lemmy.world 8 points 4 days ago

Just give them to some local children to play with.

As an aside, am I the only one who always thought Alfred was kinda a piece of shit for that story? Like a lot of Batman stuff hasn't aged well, but even when I first watched that movie, going scorched earth for a jewel thief was fucked up.

Some people want to watch the world burn. Alfred actually did set their world on fire and watched it burn.

[-] TigerAce@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 4 days ago

Melt it down, problem solved

[-] IhaveCrabs111@lemmy.world 21 points 4 days ago

Genius! Melting down rubys and sapphires, why didn’t I think of that!

[-] leftzero@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 4 days ago

I mean, they don't have that high of a melting point... you'll end up with a lump of worthless alumina, sure, but if you really want to melt them, you can. 🤷‍♂️

[-] TigerAce@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 4 days ago

Melt the gold/silver, the stones can be re-shaped. It will lose value but I think it's the only way to fend it.

[-] NutWrench@lemmy.ml 3 points 4 days ago

Things with historical value are worth far more than the cost of their raw materials. These are crown jewels, not copper pipe being sold by meth addicts.

[-] TigerAce@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 3 days ago

Yeah, I know, but the thing with that is that everyone will know it's stolen, so no one dares to buy it. Because otherwise they will sit on super rare stolen items, which could land them in prison for the rest of their lives. To the only way to fend it is to melt it down, reshape the stones and sell it for its materials for far less than it's original value, or sell it to someone who wanted these specifically and hired you to the job. But again, why would you want to sit on something as hot as this...

[-] sangriaferret@sh.itjust.works 63 points 5 days ago

So you have the jewels. Now what? Do they just go into some rich person's secret collection? It's not like you can fence these things.

[-] frongt@lemmy.zip 98 points 5 days ago

On jobs like these, they already have a buyer.

[-] Yondoza@sh.itjust.works 16 points 5 days ago

They said with suspicious confidence....

[-] minnow@lemmy.world 55 points 5 days ago

When the French Blue was stolen after the revolution, it was recut and probably became the Hope Diamond.

If they can't find a buyer, they'll melt it down and recut any gems that are too recognizable. Easy money, if you know the right people.

[-] jj4211@lemmy.world 3 points 4 days ago

In the melt down and recut scenario, is it "easy money" though? Seems like robbing the most famous museum in the planet would be inviting one of the most well resourced investigations over gems that I presume could have been stolen from somewhere a little more low profile.

I'm not remotely knowledgeable, but it feels like it wouldn't be worth going after the louvre specifically without confidence you have someone willing to acquire the pieces intact rather than having to erase nearly all their "value" in the process.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world 15 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

They think they'll dismantle and melt them and try to fence the stones (stones, especially famous ones are pretty worthless). They should get about 200 k€ for the lot if they're lucky. At least according to art specialists debating on news channels.

[-] jj4211@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago

Feels like that would be super high risk for relatively low reward. I would have guessed if you wanted some relatively anonymous gems you'd do just as well with much less risk finding a couple of much lower profile jewelry stores or something.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] cmbabul@slrpnk.net 9 points 4 days ago

Float a line to the Saudi Royal family Jared Kushner, they’d buy them no shame at all

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] A_norny_mousse@feddit.org 38 points 5 days ago

I thought this type of crime was deeply rooted in the past, and fiction. If no-one got seriously hurt: chapeau!

[-] tigeruppercut@lemmy.zip 10 points 5 days ago

Maybe not so unusual. I was at a museum in Germany on vacation a few months before I saw in the news there was a jewel heist there

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dresden_Green_Vault_burglary

[-] luciferofastora@feddit.org 4 points 4 days ago

So you were scoping the place before the deed? Hmmmm

[-] fox2263@lemmy.world 18 points 4 days ago

Can’t wait for the film

[-] GuyLivingHere@lemmy.ca 21 points 4 days ago
[-] NutWrench@lemmy.ml 8 points 4 days ago

Where was security during all this? Was there NO camera coverage on that part of the building? This is The Louvre, not a pawn shop. All the reporters keeps saying this is "the crime of the century" to which I say, "well yeah, but that's only because your awful security made that possible!"

[-] Bahnd@lemmy.world 5 points 3 days ago

We are in the "telling the public what evidence they have will alert the perps" phase, only wild media speculation until the investigators are done doing their thing.

I look forward to Internet Historian doing one of his stock image gilliamation videos about this.

[-] Darleys_Brew@lemmy.ml 18 points 4 days ago

Thats where I wear a chastity belt…no ones getting their hands on my crown jewels.

[-] Trainguyrom@reddthat.com 10 points 4 days ago

I love how my brain immediately pictured a jewel encrusted royal chastity belt despite nothing in your comment saying anything to suggest that

[-] Darleys_Brew@lemmy.ml 2 points 3 days ago

Crown jewels…Brit slang for the gentlemans area.

With the word "Princess" spelled out in diamonds washed in the blood of African children!

[-] klammeraffe@lemmy.cafe 46 points 5 days ago

Someone should really try to beat that record should they be returned.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] HugeNerd@lemmy.ca 14 points 4 days ago

Oh no, the world is missing some shiny rocks. I demand the planet cease rotating until these rocks are restituted!

[-] Kyle_The_G@lemmy.world 35 points 5 days ago
[-] D_C@sh.itjust.works 11 points 5 days ago

{Dr House barges in} "It's never lupu...sorry, what did you say?”

[-] SarcasticMan@lemmy.world 9 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)
[-] Evil_Shrubbery@thelemmy.club 22 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Microtonal_Banana@lemmy.zip 17 points 5 days ago

Where was Nicholas Cage?

[-] flightyhobler@lemmy.world 14 points 4 days ago

Didn't anyone bother to get an airtag on those things?

[-] Truscape 22 points 5 days ago

"Guys, the jewels, go get them."

"I don't know much about rocks, but I know what I like, and that is rocks that sell."

  • Bain (Payday 2)

"It's a funny fuckin' world we live in, eh?"

  • Hoxton (Payday 2)
[-] blibla@slrpnk.net 7 points 4 days ago

can't wait for the true crime yt essay

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 19 Oct 2025
445 points (100.0% liked)

News

32895 readers
2918 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS