743

Outside of typical remarks from Donald Trump, JD Vance and Mike Johnson and a Fox News report, party stayed mum

Republican voices were mostly silent as No Kings rallies and marches against Trump administration policies unfurled on Saturday, many in the spirit of a street party that countered the “hate America” depiction advanced by senior members of the party.

Instead of provocation, there were marching bands, huge banners with “we the people” references to the US constitution, and protesters wearing inflatable costumes, particularly frogs, which have emerged as a sign of resistance.

It was the third mass mobilization since Trump’s return to the White House and came against the backdrop of a government shutdown that not only has closed federal programs and services but is testing the core balance of power, as an aggressive executive confronts Congress and the courts in ways that protest organizers warn are a slide toward authoritarianism.

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] pyre@lemmy.world 3 points 4 days ago

Republicans mostly silent

good, it was time they shut the fuck up for once

[-] Treczoks@lemmy.world 13 points 6 days ago

They know they are guilty.

[-] WizardofFrobozz@lemmy.ca 13 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

This one, just like the last one, was an opportunity for cowardly liberals to assuage their guilt about not actually doing anything. The very definition of virtue signaling.

Congratulations, you’ve further emboldened fascists by confirming to them they have nothing to fear from you beyond a snarky poster and some noise on a Saturday every few months.

You’re too craven to throw a punch or break something? Fine. Do you know how easy it would be to move one of these “marches” onto a major highway? To block traffic at a major airport? But no… “that would just be SO disruptive,” and people might be MAD at you. Clowns.

[-] D_C@sh.itjust.works 12 points 6 days ago

I'm with you. If this second, ahem, 'protest' was the week or so after the first one I'd actually be very impressed, and confident that things would change.

The fact that they are 3 or 4 months apart shows that the Gestapo and the orange Shitler have less than zero to worry about.

The next question is what month next year will the next 'protest' happen? I'm guessing it'll be in February at the earliest. Wow, the Gang Of Paedos must be shaking in their boots!!!

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (11 replies)
[-] pixeltree 11 points 6 days ago

Had an asshole roll coal on us while they drove by

[-] A_norny_mousse@feddit.org 6 points 6 days ago

Still unbelievable to me that that's even a thing.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] fort_burp@feddit.nl 7 points 5 days ago

Are there many Republicans in the USA? I thought they won elections because they won the areas where votes are more valuable i.e. those places with very low population density. Same with American governance in general, like how California (pop. 39 MM & 732,189 people per electoral vote) has the same amount of Senators in Congress as Wyoming (pop. 587,000 & 192,284 people per electoral vote).

Would you say 1 out of 4 American adults are Republicans? 1 out of 3?

[-] ilinamorato@lemmy.world 8 points 5 days ago

Tough to estimate. There are definitely fewer Republicans than the GOP would like you to believe; probably far below 50%. Many more people in the US are independent and will vote for a person over a party, or at least were. Republicans win due to a combination of the Electoral College (as you noted), coordinated misinformation campaigns (including by hostile nations), voter suppression, gerrymandering, low turnout, and the fact that older people both (1) skew conservative and (2) are more likely to be politically engaged than younger people.

So, actual Republicans? Yes, almost certainly closer to 25%. Probably fewer. People who say they're independent but functionally vote conservative in every election due to the aforementioned misinformation campaigns? Maybe another 10-15% at most. Remember, "did not vote" has run the board in every election for the past 40+ years, winning practically every state by a landslide.

But this article isn't about the rank-and-file Republican citizens. It's about the grifters in elected office.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] 5in1k@lemmy.zip 7 points 6 days ago

There were a couple republicans on harleys driving past repeatedly that I made fun of and called pussies.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›
this post was submitted on 19 Oct 2025
743 points (100.0% liked)

politics

26153 readers
3041 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS