55
submitted 4 days ago by v4ld1z@lemmy.zip to c/soulslike@lemmy.zip

That's exactly the point. What's easy for one person can be insurmountable to another. What's the harm in catering to both?

all 8 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old

The fanatics will tell you that not every game is for everyone so you shouldn't play these games because making them accessible is wrong.

The toxicity of that part of the fanbase is astounding.

[-] Aeao@lemmy.world 3 points 4 days ago

I’m so happy I don’t let that stuff bother me.

“If you turn off hunger then subnatica isn’t even a survival game anymore”

“Okay”

“It’s not even fun anymore!”

“Was having plenty of fun until you showed up “

I’m the same way with steak. Well done with lots of A1. Don’t like it? Cool don’t eat it then.

[-] platypode@sh.itjust.works 12 points 4 days ago

Personally I prefer the game to offer in-game methods of changing the difficulty. Elden Ring, for example, has enough summons, consumables, co-op, side content to overlevel with, and just straight op items (something something bloodhounds step) that there isn’t really any main boss you can’t engineer a pretty easy win over. To me that feels more narratively compelling than a simple slider—it lets you trade a mechanical challenge for an intellectual one (“what would make this fight winnable?”) rather than taking you out of the game to just turn the numbers down.

[-] v4ld1z@lemmy.zip 4 points 4 days ago

And that's fair. But you probably wouldn't bat an eye if there were, in addition to that, just a couple sliders fine-tune to your liking or additional options to tick for those that want that, right? At least it sounds like that from your comment. Some people are just very adamant about such options ruining the game for players

[-] platypode@sh.itjust.works 4 points 4 days ago

Yeah I don’t mind if a game has difficulty settings. I think they’re a crude way of modifying challenge level, but if that’s how the designer wants to construct the experience, that’s their call. On the flip side, I also respect it if the designer considers those settings incompatible with the experience they’re trying to create; the presence of those settings does have a meaningful impact on the experience of playing the game (this wouldn’t be such a consistent topic if they didn’t), and I don’t believe creatives should be obligated to compromise their vision.

[-] teft@piefed.social 10 points 4 days ago

I like that they really lean into it in Another Crab's Treasure.

You feel like the game is too hard? Here's a gun that one shots everything.

As a crab.

I think they should be included for people to use because that'll get more people interested in soulslikes. The ones who say the difficulty options shouldn't be there just don't have the willpower to resist the temptation to turn down the pain.

[-] sundray@lemmus.org 6 points 4 days ago

Absolutely. I appreciate it when devs go the extra mile to enhance their players' experience.

this post was submitted on 17 Oct 2025
55 points (100.0% liked)

Soulslike - Discussion, News, Memes

818 readers
49 users here now

This is a community for discussion, news, and memes pertaining to the video game sub-genre "soulslike".

Given Lemmy's size, the definition of soulslike may be treated relatively loosely. While games like the numerous FromSoft titles, the recent Star Wars Jedi games, Lies of P, Nioh and similar games should be the focus, games that incorporate soulslike elements - like Hollow Knight and Blasphemous, for example - may also be discussed here.

Basic Lemmy-quette applies. Additionally, since flairs don't exist yet, please do make sure to include a marker to denote what game your post is about in square brackets for clarity's sake. An example could be:

[BB] This enemy is so difficult!

or

[DS1] Anyone struggling with the gargoyles?

Friends:

!liesofp@lemmy.zip

!bloodborne@lemmy.zip

!sekiro@lemmy.zip

!eldenring@lemmy.world

!shittydarksouls@lemmy.world

Should you have any questions, please do let me know.

founded 11 months ago
MODERATORS