405
all 17 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] sad_detective_man@sopuli.xyz 48 points 4 days ago
[-] Stillwater@sh.itjust.works 57 points 4 days ago
[-] NaibofTabr@infosec.pub 45 points 4 days ago

Yikes... this one right here:

(about halfway down)

my economics education is admittedly limited, but that seems terrifying... that says that the entire economy is a speculative bubble, since long before I was born... and this graph ends before the internet, before the dotcom bubble, before the accelerating cycles of VC tech speculation that have happened since... I have to imagine an updated version of this would look much worse.

My only complaint is that I think a lot of these graphs should be on logarithmic scales.

[-] ScoffingLizard@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 3 days ago

It is easier to see the change of trend line when linear though. It really drives home the magnitude of the problem. Not everyone can properly interpret a logarithmic scale.

[-] defaultusername@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 4 days ago

1973 is when the Heritage Foundation was founded.

[-] HasturInYellow@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago

I wondered why everything went to shit that year. Now it all makes sense. The rich all got on the same page.

[-] ScoffingLizard@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 4 days ago

So basically, the US dollar which is the global reserve currency, goes off gold standard, Israel gets a shit ton of money suddenly, and everyone is poor, fat, unhappy, divorced, living with parents, and without a home at a decent point in life. The global birth rate goes down. Savings accounts are fucked. It's almost like we should have a currency backed by something other than the sentiment of some old rich white men that belong in a rest home.

[-] lemmyman@lemmy.world 4 points 4 days ago

Skip to the end and you'll see that the driving factor is less beef consumption

[-] Dave@lemmy.nz 2 points 4 days ago

If you look at the CPI one that was steady for years then started going up, that would be when we started targeting a standard amount of inflation. Many of the other graphs can be attributed to this.

I think you could argue this change also allowed people to get pay rises or maintain pay and still be worse off, which could explain other graphs.

[-] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 15 points 4 days ago

me spending 3 minutes looking for Saddam Hussein:

[-] ZombiFrancis@sh.itjust.works 3 points 4 days ago

It can kinda be loss. Just count and separate the downward trends for the first three panels, and the prominent 'L' at the end for the 4th.

[-] ScoffingLizard@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 3 days ago

God said, "Oh look, scoffingLizard was born. Well, fuck this whole time period in particular."

[-] RockBottom@feddit.org 6 points 4 days ago

Except billionaire wealth.

[-] desmosthenes@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago
[-] bigfondue@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago

Carter started it. He was the first neoliberal president

this post was submitted on 03 Oct 2025
405 points (100.0% liked)

United States | News & Politics

3374 readers
606 users here now

Welcome to !usa@midwest.social, where you can share and converse about the different things happening all over/about the United States.

If you’re interested in participating, please subscribe.

Rules

Be respectful and civil. No racism/bigotry/hateful speech.

No memes.

Post news related to the United States.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS