117
submitted 2 days ago by limerod@reddthat.com to c/android@lemdro.id
  1. Does this mean sideloading is going away on Android?

Absolutely not. Sideloading is fundamental to Android and it is not going away. Our new developer identity requirements are designed to protect users and developers from bad actors, not to limit choice. We want to make sure that if you download an app, it’s truly from the developer it claims to be published from, regardless of where you get the app. Verified developers will have the same freedom to distribute their apps directly to users through sideloading or through any app store they prefer.

  1. Making APKs available to your test team

If your team’s current test process relies on distributing APKs to testers for installation using methods other than adb, you will need to verify your identity and register the package. This also applies if you make APKs available to your test teams through Google Play Internal Testing, Firebase App Distribution, or similar solutions through other distribution partners.

  1. Do I still need to register my apps if I’m only distributing to a limited number of users?

We recommend you register. It's a simple, one-time process that will allow anyone to download and install your app. However, if you prefer not to, we are also introducing a free developer account type that will allow teachers, students, and hobbyists to distribute apps to a limited number of devices without needing to provide a government ID.

  1. What can I do to prepare for developer verification?

The best way to get ready and stay updated is to sign up for early access. We’ll start sending invitations in October.

We recommend you participate in developer verification because, even though verification is not required to develop apps with Android Studio, you will need it to distribute apps to certified Android devices. Apps installed through enterprise management tools on managed devices will also be installable without being registered.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] LordCrom@lemmy.world 15 points 1 day ago

After this initiative, it will be real easy for google to identify the ones who build those "track ICE" apps and others that the powers that be may not be happy with.

[-] limerod@reddthat.com 7 points 1 day ago

Yeah, this is most infuriating thing about this. Other countries could compel any apps they deem bad and ask for identification.

[-] enbiousenvy 10 points 1 day ago

hopefully this will cause more hand support & financial support towards linux phone

[-] dosse91@lemmy.trippy.pizza 12 points 1 day ago

I will not register any of my applications with this fascist garbage, I'd rather deprecate them and stop developing on android altogether.

[-] dessalines@lemmy.ml 24 points 1 day ago

As a developer of 4 FOSS android apps (both on f-droid and the play store): Does anyone know if there's an existing campaign by other devs to oppose this, and boycott the play store until they cave? I'd be happy to participate.

[-] shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip 23 points 1 day ago

Google can go fuck themselves. I've at least started looking at Ubuntu Touch and potentially going to virtualize it and see how it works. I hope the accessibility is alright though because I rely on magnification and a screen reader to use my device. So I'm going to cross my fingers.

If most app developers comply and I can't get apps on lineage or graphene anymore, and Linux isn't accessible on mobile, I will just have to abandon mobile entirely and go back to my Linux laptop.

[-] pulsewidth@lemmy.world 39 points 2 days ago
  1. Does this mean sideloading is going away on Android?

Absolutely not. Your sideloaded app will simply refuse to run if the developer has not verified themselves with Google. This will cause any older app that is no longer updated to fail, as well as any apps by developers whom dislike Google's repeated monopolistic behaviour, and opt-out of the program. In short, most apps currently sideloaded will no longer be able to. We call this 'sideload rightsizing'. We will also be keeping users safe by suing the developers of apps we don't like, such as Grayjay, FreeTube, NewPipe, Shizuku, and Magisk - this will be much easier with their government IDs showing their legal names and addresses.

Ftfy Google.

[-] Amir@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 day ago

Isn't the Magisk dev working at Google now? Would be funny if they sued him

[-] pulsewidth@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

I haven't used Magisk in some time, admittedly wasn't aware of this. However I see that since he was hired, Magisk seems to no longer have a goal of bypassing SafetyNet or obfuscating itself. Any issue logged about bypassing it or failures using banking apps, etc simply get automatically closed on the GitHub issue registry. So while Magisk still aims to give root and manage access to it, it no longer touches anything related to hiding root access or obfuscating itself from detection since topjohnwu went to work for Google..

So yeah he's not gonna get sued, he has been bought.

I could be wrong though, this is only 20 mins of research, so take it with a grain of salt.

[-] Netrics@lemmy.ca 20 points 2 days ago

All I heard was is "COMPLY". Yeah, no thanks. I will keep my shades on.

[-] Dirk@lemmy.ml 87 points 2 days ago
  1. Does this mean sideloading is going away on Android?

No, but we have to approve it.

FTFY.

[-] BakedCatboy@lemmy.ml 24 points 2 days ago

Or alternatively:

  1. Does this mean unverified sideloading is going away on Android?

Yes

[-] joyjoy@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 day ago

I'm hearing this as:

every single apk you make needs to be registered with google so users devices can "phone home" to verify the app signature.

Talk about privacy.

[-] ook@discuss.tchncs.de 35 points 2 days ago

Yeah, fuck that noise. They know exactly that this is the problem.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] redti@lemmy.zip 11 points 1 day ago

Because we love developers we want them free to not complying to big corp Google spyware. Please devs love the users back and don't comply!

[-] dontbelievethis@sh.itjust.works 44 points 2 days ago
[-] shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 day ago

I've been looking at Ubuntu Touch and thinking that it might be time to attempt virtualizing it and trying it out before I need a new device.

I really hope that the magnification and the screen reader are up to par because I'm a low vision user who really needs the accessibility to work.

[-] limerod@reddthat.com 67 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

After all that outcry. They only wrote about devs demanding longer. Conveniently ignoring fdroid's post among others.

Even for hobby projects you would be required to create a limited developer account and submit government identification if you want to distribute apps to a larger audience.

load more comments (2 replies)

Let’s talk security:

  1. No smart phones
  2. profit
[-] limerod@reddthat.com 6 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

In today's digital age its not doable. You need a smartphone if you work, get medical assistance, access social media, do online payments.

Now, if you mentioned using an alternative OS like Linux we can agree.

(Coming from the US)

  1. Your personal device isn’t a work provide piece of equipment. They will provide one for you. Keep it professional like a work computer, don’t do personal things on it.
  2. there’s plenty of ways to get help medically = cvs, Walgreens, anyone can call 911, you don’t need to go to a hospital; there’s plenty of clients, those medical apps also have 1-800 numbers
  3. you don’t NEED access to social media and also use a tablet or computer
  4. tablet of computer, you’re not paying bills daily and payment cards still work.
[-] 0_o7@lemmy.dbzer0.com 49 points 2 days ago

Getting off with just a wrist slap on their monopoly trial has embolden them. They think they're untouchable now. I wouldn't be surprised they have a backroom deal with the feds too.

[-] artyom@piefed.social 15 points 2 days ago

Given the current corrupt and invulnerable administration, absolutely.

[-] FutileRecipe@lemmy.world 9 points 2 days ago

It's the whole "if a fine is less than the profit, the fine is just considered a cost of business."

[-] Cassa 46 points 2 days ago

"security" my ass

[-] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 15 points 2 days ago

This doesn't fix anything

The problem is Google gate keeping the platform.

[-] cmgvd3lw@discuss.tchncs.de 27 points 2 days ago

If this is adopted, soon github would require your SSN for writing hello world.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] ALERT@sh.itjust.works 14 points 2 days ago

how does one start repressions and censorship? by saying "it's for your own safety"

[-] curbstickle@anarchist.nexus 14 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

You could do what I did and let them know via feedback that you'll be leaving for Apple since its the same thing now.

I won't actually be going to apple, but to a linuxphone, but saying Apple is probably going to have more impact so I went with that.

Edit: This is feedback to them linked in that page.

If you have a dev account, I recommend using it to give them feedback.

load more comments (11 replies)
[-] urheber@discuss.tchncs.de 21 points 2 days ago
[-] FriendOfDeSoto@startrek.website 12 points 2 days ago

I've been thinking about strategies to get Google to back down on this. And I think the most viable strategy is to let them know that we will all move to iOS if they go through with it. If they lock down their OS, then we might as well use the OG locked down OS and turn to Apple. We only have to make this convincing enough.

I don't want to go to the dark side either. But as the light is going out on this side: I'm gonna need a new phone within the next 12-18 months. For the first time since ditching my blackberry I'm thinking about switching again. And for the first time ever I'm seriously thinking about an iPhone. All my purchases and what not be dammed. LOOK WHAT YOU MADE ME DO, GOOGLE!

[-] Eagle0110@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

This would not help us much at all, Google clearly doesn't consider iOS a completing platform because Google's core business is still advertising not selling phones or phone OS (which Apple does both since all iPhones are iOS devices and all iOS phones are iPhones). And on iPhones Google already have most of their ads delivery platform and services offered, you have iOS apps for YouTube, YouTube Music and all of them, while the closed nature of iOS makes it even more difficult for people to do things like blocking Google's ads with system-wide adblockers or bypassing YouTube ads with modded YouTube clients, like you can easily so on Android.

Not to mention iPhones such soooo much more than a locked down Android since on Android it's still much easier to root as long as you have a phone with unlocked bootloader, than to jailbreak literally any iOS device, since iOS jailbreaking actually requires exploits and Android still has mostly a Linux kernel so a lot of the tools work out of the box, while iOS does not at all and has a very different OS architecture.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 01 Oct 2025
117 points (100.0% liked)

Android

20358 readers
30 users here now

The new home of /r/Android on Lemmy and the Fediverse!

Android news, reviews, tips, and discussions about rooting, tutorials, and apps.

🔗Universal Link: !android@lemdro.id


💡Content Philosophy:

Content which benefits the community (news, rumours, and discussions) is generally allowed and is valued over content which benefits only the individual (technical questions, help buying/selling, rants, self-promotion, etc.) which will be removed if it's in violation of the rules.


Support, technical, or app related questions belong in: !askandroid@lemdro.id

For fresh communities, lemmy apps, and instance updates: !lemdroid@lemdro.id

💬Matrix Chat

💬Telegram channels / chats

📰Our communities below


Rules

  1. Stay on topic: All posts should be related to the Android OS or ecosystem.

  2. No support questions, recommendation requests, rants, or bug reports: Posts must benefit the community rather than the individual. Please post to !askandroid@lemdro.id.

  3. Describe images/videos, no memes: Please include a text description when sharing images or videos. Post memes to !androidmemes@lemdro.id.

  4. No self-promotion spam: Active community members can post their apps if they answer any questions in the comments. Please do not post links to your own website, YouTube, blog content, or communities.

  5. No reposts or rehosted content: Share only the original source of an article, unless it's not available in English or requires logging in (like Twitter). Avoid reposting the same topic from other sources.

  6. No editorializing titles: You can add the author or website's name if helpful, but keep article titles unchanged.

  7. No piracy or unverified APKs: Do not share links or direct people to pirated content or unverified APKs, which may contain malicious code.

  8. No unauthorized polls, bots, or giveaways: Do not create polls, use bots, or organize giveaways without first contacting mods for approval.

  9. No offensive or low-effort content: Don't post offensive or unhelpful content. Keep it civil and friendly!

  10. No affiliate links: Posting affiliate links is not allowed.

Quick Links

Our Communities

Lemmy App List

Chat and More


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS