468

Starfields is one of the biggest games of 2023 – but it’s joined other recent games like Baldurs Gate 3 in being boycotted by conservatives because of the way it interacts with gender.

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] orphiebaby@lemm.ee 11 points 1 year ago

Starfield and BG3 aren't being boycotted. Those are just empty threats. Remember all the other times people said they were going to boycott their favorite games, and actually did it? Neither do I.

[-] stopthatgirl7@kbin.social 8 points 1 year ago

I remember back in 2016 conservatives screaming they were going to boycott Hamilton because of the cast making an appeal to Pence at final curtain, and people laughing hysterically at them because back then, there was no way any of them claiming they were going to boycott would have been able to get tickets in the first place.

[-] TechyDad@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

They also proclaimed that they were boycotting the Star Wars sequels and claimed that they would tank at the box office thanks to the boycott. Instead the films did really well.

(I have my problems with those movies due to the plot, but having a woman main character and a black main character wasn't an issue for me.)

[-] assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

Ironically I think a lot of problems with those movies, particularly the last one, is they actually listened to the screeching conservatives and minimized Finn and Rose.

That, and J J Abrams can't write an original script for the life of him.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] dylanTheDeveloper@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

You can be whoever you want in Balders gate 3 (genitals included) yet Starfield crosses the line?

[-] Goblin_Mode@ttrpg.network 5 points 1 year ago

Tbf most conservatives probably haven't played BG3 or know much of anything about it/forgotten realms. They aren't exactly the target audience

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] GiddyGap@lemm.ee 10 points 1 year ago

I wasn't really interested in Starfield...until now. Let's play Starfield.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] CodexArcanum@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

I feel like this whole pronouns in starfield thing is actually astroturf to draw attention away from Bethesda being evil and abusive to trans people who worked for them. Plus it drowns out any news about the game's actual qualities or merits, which like all Bethesda games at launch, seems to be lacking.

There's so many reasons to be actually mad at so many things, and all this culture war bullshit is deliberate smoke to keep people running in circles.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] ominouslemon@lemm.ee 9 points 1 year ago

I mean, liberals boycotted Hogwarts Legacy because of J.K. Rowling (which was not even involved in the development). It seems to me that people just like boycotting stuff in general

[-] Drivebyhaiku@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

Conservatives lost their shit over one beer can being sent to a trans streamer and en mass posted memes of them blowing up and shooting their beer.

Honestly at this point I think we can just leave the bunch of the bigoted whiners behind and stop giving a shit that they are unhappy. Giving someone the option to play a trans character in a videogame is just giving all players more options on how to experience the game. If you decide to not take the option meant to be someone else's yum then it's not gunna impact your gameplay aside from checking a box at the beginning of the game around the same time you are deciding the exact slope of your nose.

It's like when people find themselves unreasonably annoyed that a vegan option is available on a menu. Why the hell should anyone give a damn that you're unhappy with food you ain't gunna eat when you can order whatever you like?

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Vrijgezelopkamers@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

You can go as cis-conservative as you want with your pronouns in the game. No-one is forcing those conservatives to give in to their innermost desires.

[-] TrismegistusMx@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

The temptation is sinful to them in the same way that their murders and violence are righteous.

They don't realize the God they worship is Mammon.

[-] Mandy@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 year ago

thats has the same energy as the people who think pretty much anything can turn someone gay

[-] A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

I'm convinced anyone that thinks (insert item here) can turn people gay are just closeted gay people who are afraid to come out cause their politics are more important than their happiness.

[-] Malfeasant@lemm.ee 5 points 1 year ago

This is nothing new. Why do you think they make such a big deal about sexuality being a choice? Because for them, it is.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] kromem@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

I just wish it was a better game they were cutting off their nose to spite their face with.

[-] Kahlenar@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago
[-] HowManyNimons@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

But wouldn't it be great it they did? I could start playing games online again.

[-] PostmodernPythia@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

This will pair eell with their botcott of reality.

[-] Furbag@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

It's a single prompt during character creation. The default option is always cisgendered. Literally 30 seconds or less and you never have to think about it ever again. In fact, you can ignore it entirely and it'll have been as if it was never there. Woooow such controversy.

I refuse to believe anybody is actually dumb enough to boycott the game over this. There are plenty of fucking legitimate reasons to not buy it, but having the option to select alternative pronouns during character creation is not one of them.

[-] Shush@reddthat.com 5 points 1 year ago

Oh no!

Anyway...

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›
this post was submitted on 19 Sep 2023
468 points (100.0% liked)

politics

19260 readers
2012 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS