“Agrees” and “forced under duress” are not the same thing. An agreement before both, I think.
They were sued. Nintendo won. The people don’t have a chance against corporations.
“Agrees” and “forced under duress” are not the same thing. An agreement before both, I think.
They were sued. Nintendo won. The people don’t have a chance against corporations.
I thought the reason that Nintendo was always able to win these copyright accusations was due to Japan's strict copyright laws. But if I read correctly, this was fought over in a US court, or am I misunderstanding something?
Methode would not be too different in a US court (it's pro-corporate instead of merely strict) but result is the same.
Jesus christ Nintendo
1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy
2. Don't request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote
3. Don't request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs
4. Don't submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others
📜 c/Piracy Wiki (Community Edition):
FUCK ADOBE!
Torrenting/P2P:
Gaming:
💰 Please help cover server costs.
![]() |
![]() |
---|---|
Ko-fi | Liberapay |