605
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] roofTophopper@lemmy.world 12 points 2 hours ago

This whole Epstein stuff is a test of how willing some people are to gargle balls and simply believe a "nope, didn't do it" defense.

It's been said time and time again, man could literally decapitate multiple people on national TV, camera zoomed in, and still drop the "nope, didn't do" line at the end and his cult would agree.

[-] GlendatheGayWitch@lemmy.world 10 points 1 hour ago

Late 2015/early 2016, Trump himself said that he could shoot someone on 5th Avenue and not lose any votes.

[-] DeathByBigSad@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 hour ago

Depends on if the ballot of the maga voter he shot would still legally count posthumerously.

Wait nvm, he's a maga, no way he actually voted early, since that's what "woke libs" do.

[-] DarkFuture@lemmy.world 2 points 2 hours ago

Yup.

Anyone still ignoring...fuck...where do I even begin? The probable pedophilia. The repeated violations of the Constitution. The felonies. The rape conviction. The open admission of sexual assault. The clear abuse of the stock market for his personal gain. Threatening American cities with the military.

It just goes on and on. Anyone still ignoring this is undeniably a traitor to the United States of America. So, basically, every fucking conservative in this country.

These people aren't just misled anymore. They're our enemies. They're America's enemies. Period.

[-] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 hours ago

" Oh.. that was AI. "

This will negate any proof or evidence going forward. Loser politicians are doing this everywhere now.

https://youtu.be/eFR0lYDDKDM

[-] lmagitem@lemmy.zip 13 points 4 hours ago

I don't get it. They all know it. There are court testimonies. Knowing 10% of the facts, even a child with two brain cells can make the connection. Why are they all acting like it's the-thing-that-must-not-be-named or something?

[-] BearGun@ttrpg.network 3 points 3 hours ago

probably because whoever says it will be sued to high heaven by trump and his cronies, since it hasn't been proven in court (and likely never will be).

[-] BearGun@ttrpg.network 1 points 3 hours ago

probably because whoever says it will be sued to high heaven by trump and his cronies, since it hasn't been proven in court (and likely never will be).

[-] Gates9@sh.itjust.works 6 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

Clinton met with Netanyahu in the Oval Office in February 1997. Subsequently, according to testimony Lewinsky gave to the special counsel’s office, Clinton’s secretary Bettie Currie reached out to Lewinsky to invite her to an Oval Office meeting, telling her Clinton “had something important to tell her.”

It would turn out to be their final sexual encounter, but Clinton also used the opportunity to tell her that “a foreign embassy” had tapped his phone and recorded their conversation, Lewinsky said. Clinton did not specify which embassy, though the meeting with Lewinsky came the month after his meeting with Netanyahu.

https://www.dropsitenews.com/p/did-benjamin-netanyahu-blackmail

This is the picture Jeffrey Epstein had hanging in his house

[-] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 5 points 2 hours ago

I don't doubt for a second this was Epstein's true "purpose", and that he collected blackmail material (or kompromat, as you prefer) for multiple intelligence agencies, including the CIA and FBI.

This is why Barr had him killed. A bunch of old-school republican and Democratic monsters were in those videos.

This whole thing underscores how weak the corporate news sewers are. They're really poorly done PR, with very occasional random acts of journalism actually making it out the door.

[-] EightBitBlood@lemmy.world 9 points 2 hours ago

Cool. Here's Trump admitting to wanting to fuck kids over the age of 12 on Howard Stern:

https://youtu.be/tTVE7ujMapI

Great picture of Clinton in Epsteins house though.

[-] Gates9@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 hours ago

Yeah Israel blackmailed both of them

[-] MedicPigBabySaver@lemmy.world 6 points 5 hours ago

Release the Trump/Epstein files

[-] Fondots@lemmy.world 38 points 14 hours ago

Even if we ignore the doodle

And that given all we know about about trump and Epstein, we know that the inside joke between them here is about pedophila, or at the very least about them being creepy misogynistic sex pests.

And let's assume that despite everything we know about them that somehow this is about something inane, like a shared love of football, or model railroading, or going to McDonald's for hamberders or something.

Can we agree that this is just a really fucking weird and creepy way to write a birthday letter? Someone tells you they're going to put together a book of letters from friends for someone's birthday and this is what you spit out? The script of some weird scenario you imagined where the two of you are responding to a voiceover and jerking each other off about your shared hobby?

If I got a letter, card, Facebook post, message, etc. like this from someone I know, I'd ask them if they're alright because that's a fucking weird way to send a birthday message.

[-] LadyButterfly@reddthat.com 1 points 3 hours ago

Yep!! I get that sense of humour is a personal thing but this is utterly weird. It's creepy, and not normal. I'm a dv outreach worker and men that do weird things like this are often highly sexually abusive. It's just... creepy AF

[-] ameancow@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago

if we ignore the doodle

Don't worry, everyone will.

[-] MourningDove@lemmy.zip 9 points 14 hours ago

Wasn’t this news like two months ago?

[-] b161 18 points 17 hours ago

It’s fucking “risqué” is it you bunch of sick fucking pedos??

[-] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 4 points 4 hours ago

Surprised they didn't use the corporate favorite..."controversial".

Every time I see some corporate outlet using the term "controversial", I think of bluegal and driftglass saying "say 'controversial' one more fucking time...."

[-] trager_bombs@lemmy.world 122 points 23 hours ago

Wait, I thought he never doodled though? What else could he have lied about??!

[-] defaultusername@lemmy.dbzer0.com 15 points 18 hours ago

I think the list of what he didn't lie about would be much, much shorter.

[-] DarkDarkHouse@lemmy.sdf.org 11 points 17 hours ago

Here you go:

load more comments (21 replies)
[-] WanderWisley@lemmy.world 23 points 19 hours ago

Good, awesome, great, now release the Epstein files.

[-] Archangel1313@lemmy.ca 29 points 20 hours ago

"Risque"? What happened to "bawdy"?

[-] simplejack@lemmy.world 62 points 23 hours ago

His name is way less pubie than early mockups illustrated.

Still creepy AF.

Also, Trump doesn’t know how to draw boobs.

[-] NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip 143 points 23 hours ago

He was drawing underdeveloped prepubescent breasts.

You're welcome.

[-] simplejack@lemmy.world 52 points 22 hours ago
load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] jballs@sh.itjust.works 44 points 23 hours ago

Fucking grrrooooooossss.

That image is way worse than the recreations people made based on the description.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 08 Sep 2025
605 points (100.0% liked)

politics

25552 readers
2193 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS