8
all 5 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] CaptainBlinky@lemmy.myserv.one 4 points 6 days ago

"Are you the king of the Jews?"

"That is what you call me."

"OK boys, the 'king' needs a crown!"

Henchmen snickering, making a crown of thorns. Not really that complicated.

[-] plyth@feddit.org 7 points 1 week ago

Not an expert but maybe it helps you to know that Romans had all kinds of floral crowns, e.g. Caesar's laurel crown. It's a story for the citizens of the Roman empire so that could be a context to interpret it.

[-] thisbenzingring@lemmy.sdf.org 4 points 1 week ago

vindictive

he wasn't really saying he was king of the Jews, he was basically saying I Am.. And only God or the Messiah is able to make such a claim. This is why the Jewish leaders didn't try to stop the Romans from executing him for the crimes of basically saying that religion is wrong.

[-] AbouBenAdhem@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

The Romans (at that point) weren’t concerned about suppressing Christianity as a religion, but with using the execution to deter potential independence movements. So they gave him the crown of thorns to indicate to Jewish separatists that their political aspirations would be self-defeating.

this post was submitted on 30 Aug 2025
8 points (100.0% liked)

AskHistorians

1128 readers
5 users here now

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS