440
0% of Democrats happy with state of the US right now
(www.newsweek.com)
Im shocked its not lower.
LOL got me
Never listen to a centrist again when they tell you "how things have to be" to win an election.
But but no matter who
Such a tired bit of propaganda. Y'all need to acknowledge that while we wouldn't have had progress under Kamala we also would not have had Alligator Auscwhitz, a near doubling of homeland security's budget, illegal kidnappings/deportations, the US military policing American cities, tariffs, RFK Jr., honestly I could keep going.
She ran a shit campaign, people were dissatisfied with the former administration. She should never have been there, but all those that decided to abstain damned us all.
It's like sitting one a sinking ship, throwing all the life jackets overboard, and complaining "well I didn't sink the ship".
Now millions of people in this country from those in the LGBTQ community to immigrants live in fear. Because some people thought they were so morally superior. Well congrats.
I don't even like the democrats, but I'm at least capable of realizing that sometimes you have to pick what causes the least amount of harm. Sometimes you can't have an ideal outcome. I'd rather run off the road than plow through children crossing the street. Neither are a good option, but only one is morally correct. And no taking your hands off the wheel and complaining isn't a moral option.
Exactly. Now instead of only continuing the genocide that was never going to be stopped regardless of the outcome of the election, we get a second genocide right here at home.
That you take the former as given is the whole reason the Democratic party has like a 20% approval rating. People don't vote for parties that just act like bad things are just immutable facts of life, especially when it's blatantly obvious that the bad thing could be changed if the political will existed.
Very sound logic.
Probably won't comfort trans people when they're shoved into death camps, but for a brief moment you got to feel superior. So that's gotta count for something right?
I voted for Harris and the people you're losing are the ones who don't care about feeling superior, they just don't feel like voting is very important and dumb statements like "regardless of who is elected, this bad thing won't change" reinforce that idea.
Honestly that's a fair point. I feel like this is a major failure of our civics education.
If we did mandatory voting, made election day a federal holiday, and treated it like a much more important civil duty the results would be wildly different.
load more comments
(1 replies)
Imo it was a damned if you do, damned if you don’t situation for Democrats; which is exactly what Republicans, Israel, and bad actors crafted the situation to be.
If the public stance was not Democrats being 100% for Israel, then they believed they would have lost the election because of the political PACs and donors flipping to fund the opposition.
Given how much money the lobbies that were pro-Israel were pushing into the campaign trail, any candidate that didn’t take that stance in a close election was for sure at risk of losing their donor vote.
I still think Democrats should have done more, such as saying they would fully step into the situation to prevent the loss of more lives for both Palestinians and Israelis. It also didn’t help that Biden was pro-Israel and expected Kamala to be lock-step with his stances while on the campaign trail.
load more comments
(2 replies)
And how exactly do you suggest Kamala to have become elected, exactly, with her position on the genocide and her "I would do nothing different" approach to politics?
Because you are doing a bait and switch, right now, with what the critique was and how you are interpreting it.
The critique was, that if Kamala didn't change her position on the genocide, she wouldn't be elected. You are interpreting that as if the argument was that she shouldn't be elected.
I want to also point out that this same, disingenuous interpretation was omnipresent in the run up to the election: criticism of Harris or her ability to convince the electorate was interpreted as being "against" Harris. This was met with some of the worst brigading and dog-piling the internet has ever seen. This disingenuous approach almost certainly drove voters away from Harris, because of her supporters vapid intolerance to the critique that the candidate needed to change their policies because they were blowing it.
So the onus is on you. How do you, exactly, propose getting 6 million additional votes for Harris? What functional mechanism? Because it's on your camp at this point, since that camp that ran interference from people trying to move the candidate to a more electable position.
I hold no loyalties to Harris. As stated her campaign was shit and she should never have ran. I'm not part of any "camp".
It's not my job to lead you to something all so obvious. Project 2025 was published. We knew this would happen. You decided that the lives of immigrants and queer people were unimportant to you. You decided it was more important to act superior than to swallow just a little bit of your pride and protect lives. I'm sorry that "dogpile" is too much for you to handle.
I'm sure the corpses this administration is making will really really care about my onus
Oh don't fool yourself that you represent any kind of a leader.
What lost this election was Harris's refusal to move on Gaza, and that was supported by the Blue MAGA/ BNMW contingent.
We had the chance to kick Harris into the right direction on Gaza if we could have broken through the down vote wall/ static interference being run by blue MAGA in that campaign.
If you were defending Harris' position on Gaza instead of demanding her to change, you are responsible for her loss.
We needed to move 6 million people and you are offering NO mechanism for that. The only way was to move the candidate. If you interfered in placing pressure on the candidate, this is on you.
Now you're making the assumptions. I never defended her position on the genocide. It was deplorable. I often spoke against it.
But guess what, neither canidate showed a willingness to budge on that.
Now we're going to get 2 genocides and lose what little bit of democracy we had.
But hey what's a little martial law. She wasn't perfect, so you know we're gotta let the fascists take over instead because I'm a smart boy.
That isn't a mechanism to move 6 million votes onto the Harris side of the balance sheet. You want to make the argument that any blue should have done? Show me how. Because we just ran the experiment, and it turns out, any blue wouldn't do. Voters cared enough about policy to stay home. We ran with ABWD. It lost the election, for all of us.
Try again.
Honestly this is pointless. I'm not going to explain how the electoral college works, if you understood that you wouldn't keep repeating 6 million votes.
Here's what matters now.
Protests on Monday. We can't fix the mistakes of the past anymore. Now we gotta organize. See you there
Oh now it's pointless?
No it's not fucking pointless because idiots like you just handed the country to fascism instead of demanding better of the candidate. And it cost us everything.
You owe me a mechanism, and if you cant propose one, you don't have one iota of integrity with the blame you place on this who were advocating that Harris needed to change her position on Israel/ Gaza.
it's just same toxic shit from the same toxic clowns who just handed this country over to the facisists.
No it's not fucking pointless because idiots like you just handed the country to fascism instead of
🪞🪞🪞
You owe me a mechanism
This may shock you but I don't owe you anything at all.
Anyway, I'm going to organize. I'm going to protest. What are you gonna do this week?
All you've done in this is constantly move goal posts.
You criticized those who said Harris needed to change her stance on Gaza to win the election by blaming them for the loss. If you want that to be the case, you need to show me a path where Kamala holds her position and wins.
Even worse, you are dismissing the critique as "propaganda". Bruh, your right wing take is the fucking propaganda.
If you are going to levy that criticism, you need to show me a path where Kamala holds her position and wins. If you can't do so, shut the fuck up and listen to your betters next time.
shut the fuck up and listen to your betters next time
See that's the moral superiority complex that handed the MAGA fascists our country.
If it's now "right wing propaganda" to resist and work to prevent fascism and the MAGA takeover of our country so be it
we also would not have had Alligator Auscwhitz
concentration camps for immigrants have been a thing since at least obama. remember "kids in cages"? remember how biden didn’t free them?
a near doubling of homeland security's budget
trump nearly doubled the DHS’s budget between 2017 and 2021, biden never decreased it. in fact, it kept increasing under him
illegal kidnappings/deportations
instead we would have had legal kidnappings/deportations! much better ☺️
the US military policing American cities
because regular police isn’t militarized and corrupt to hell anyways
tariffs
chinese EVs anyone?
RFK Jr.
i’ll give you that one
yes trump is worse in almost every way. but there is still not much meaningful difference between both parties. note, also, that harris sold herself as tougher on immigration than trump. would this have been true? idk, maybe not, but it still signifies she would’ve gone in the same direction
concentration camps for immigrants have been a thing since at least obama. remember "kids in cages"? remember how biden didn’t free them?
They were bad, now they're worse. That's ignoring the difference in scale too.
trump nearly doubled the DHS’s budget between 2017 and 2021, biden never decreased it. in fact, it kept increasing under him
Fair, but once again scale. Doubling a budget in 1 year is actually a lot different than doing it over 4 years.
instead we would have had legal kidnappings/deportations! much better ☺️
Umm yeah, the erosion of due proccess is scary as shit. A sitting US president is removing people from the country to random prisons elsewhere with no due proccess. Deportations are a problem, but the new issue is the dissolution of civil liberties that applies to everyone.
because regular police isn’t militarized and corrupt to hell anyways
Correct, but not the actual issue. Police, while horribly corrupt, have jurisdiction and are theoretically bound to the local government. The military does not have the legal authority to police US citizens. It's a much bigger issue than militarized police.
chinese EVs anyone?
A handful of targeted tariffs are very common. Basically every nation does them. Once again scale. But I do hate how this benefited Elon.
i’ll give you that one
Worms for the worm god
Anyway, your comparisons lack the necessary depth. A lot of the new issues come down to scale and method. Cruelty has become the point. The law is being ignored in such a way that it suggests soon citizens will have no rights. That's fucking scary and so so much worse than anything Biden did.
You don't understand, the blue guy pretended to ignore all of this, that's clearly better. Now shut up and don't ask questions!
load more comments
(2 replies)
You can write as many paragraphs as you need to feel better but a Harris win was never possible. Our political process has been completely captured by a class of billionaires. The working class have no representation. Elections continue only as a means to accelerate partisan culture war distraction to keep the working class divided. The outcome was pre determined. Direct your anger at billionaires not working class people.
I reject the assertion that there is absolutely no chance and our elections are predetermined. They're dug in real deep and have an insanely strong influence but there is a chance as long as elections continue to happen.
Also just because the billionaires are the enemy doesn't mean the common man can't be wrong. When it comes to a class war I'm more than willing to let bygones be bygones. But that doesn't mean we still can't discuss the poor actions of our peers.
Just watched a legal eagle video on helldivers that gives a nice little primer on managed democracy.
Folks here should watch it. Not that it would actually get them to pull their voluntary blinders off to stop spewing bullshit propaganda about how the democrats can and will save us.
Ok then why reject Mamdani in NY and Fateh in MN?
I don't?
I love Mamdani. Personally haven't heard much about Fateh but if their policies are similar sign me up.
I don’t mean you, I mean the DNC.
load more comments
(9 replies)
load more comments
(5 replies)
0% of Democrats happy with state of the US right now
MAGA: That's how we know we're doing the right thing!
While 76 percent of Republicans say they are satisfied with the direction of the country
What the absolute fuck?? These fucking people would be happy with the direction of north Korea. Decades of relentless propaganda have really done a number on these people and destroyed their critical thinking
65% of Republican voters are ages 50 and over, these people don't really care about anything except their retirement accounts. So long as Republicans can keep the stock market growing they don't give a shit.
load more comments
(1 replies)
How do those protest votes feel now, assholes?
(to those voters, obvs)
Currently democrats are having a registration crisis while Republicans are having a boom, so pretty good?
Like you'd think those numbers would be opposite, maybe they are a continued indictment of the DNC democratic party that continues to ignore any candidate who has organic support like Mamdami.
Never underestimate DNC’s ability to snatch defeat from the jaws of victory.
I dropped Dem for DSA in 2016.
I think voting for a D in the general is generally a good harm reduction strategy. That said, I'm a big fan of the Working Families Party, tho they aren't active where I'm at. They seem to be "more practical" at gaining political power, while still fairly well-aligned with the DSA about how it should be used.
I, too, started looking for something "left" of the DNC in 2016; I was a fan of Bernie [and other progressives].
I was just listening to an explanation of this effectively fake bit of information this morning. Basically, at least in MA and other states like it, both dems and republicans saw a drop in registration because registrations work differently now. Where registrations are automatic, they don't default to a party affiliation and you have to actively select such, which most people aren't going to do. As a result, an absolutely enormous proportion of registrations are now unaffiliated and BOTH parties are more or less taking a hit--however, because Dems get more registrations historically anyway and many of those are now no longer going in to register just party affiliation, they seem disproportionately hit. End of the day, not much is really changing that we can understand from the voting registrations, but we'll see what happens in the midterms.
load more comments
(2 replies)
Keep crying instead of fighting trump
you'd have to be braindead to be happy with the state of the US right now.
Gallup's polling found Republicans were essentially just as dissatisfied with the direction of the country in July last year as Democrats are today. However, the partisan gap at the time was 35 points because only 36 percent of Democrats were satisfied with the country's direction at the time.
ouch
So they are going to change their electoral tactics, right?
Right????
load more comments
(1 replies)
Good! As a Democratic Strategist I can USE this Information to CONVINCE the DNC to go even FURTHER Right to Court the Republicans who ARE Happy with the US! That's the ONLY way we can WIN again!
i can see why
But I bet many lefties will still refuse to vote if it’s not the perfect candidate.
load more comments
(2 replies)
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 29 Aug 2025
440 points (100.0% liked)
politics
25565 readers
1961 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS