613
2hot2handle (mander.xyz)
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Zerush@lemmy.ml 17 points 2 hours ago
  • Water in space boils, freezes or evaporates?
  • Yes
[-] anas@lemmy.world 86 points 10 hours ago

Again, who’s recreating Twitter screenshots really badly, and why? There’s a person on Reddit with like five alts who’s been spamming these posts, and I’m so confused by it.

[-] exasperation@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 56 minutes ago

This post literally has the watermark of the account that creates/posts these. Other people or bots are reposting them, sure, but they're coming from some kind of aggregation account that has this particular style of recreating Twitter threads in a space that fits into the Instagram preference for square images.

[-] fmstrat@lemmy.nowsci.com 10 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

Bots building histories. (Not this post, on Reddit)

[-] unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de 34 points 8 hours ago

The entire picture looks completely fake like somebody tried to create a twitter screenshot from scratch in paint.

[-] Rozz@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 4 hours ago

You should be able to do a near perfect job in any image editor. They make kits that have all the assets already built.

[-] theneverfox@pawb.social 90 points 12 hours ago

I hate the mansplaining accusation, especially in this context

Fucking let ideas compete. Call him out for being pedantic. If you have to bring gender into nearly any conversation about science, you've already lost

Just shame them with better science

[-] kryptonianCodeMonkey@lemmy.world 21 points 2 hours ago

The term "mansplaining" is not just about a man being pedantic. It is a man being pedantic or overexplaining to a woman either about something she is likely more knowledgeable on than he is or about something that is such common knowledge it should be assumed that she knows these facts as well as he does. It is a demonstration of misogyny through the assumption that you, a man, knows better than her, a woman, despite all liklihood to the contrary and yet you condescend to her anyway. It's the arrogance and gender bias that is the problem, not the pedantry itself.

[-] Pyr_Pressure@lemmy.ca 20 points 1 hour ago

The thing I don't like about the mansplaining accusation is it makes lots of men out to be sexist/misogynistic when they are really just pedantic twits that very well could have commented the same stupid thing to a man. But because it was to a woman someone has to accuse them of being sexist too.

Don't get me wrong there are a lot of sexist assholes, but just assuming it to be the case off a single comment irks me.

[-] exasperation@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 50 minutes ago

they are really just pedantic twits that very well could have commented the same stupid thing to a man.

Yes, but men experience this at a slightly lower rate.

So if an astronaut man were to get, say, 10 of these comments, while an astronaut woman gets 15 of these comments, it's fair to infer that about 5 out of the 15 comments wouldn't have been made to a man. Problem is that you can't exactly tell which 5 they are. But you know it's happening.

Of course, if the ratio is actually closer to 50 versus 10 comments like this, then you've got a pretty good sense that 80% of the pedantic overexplainers-to-an-expert are doing it because the original poster is a woman.

And one thing you find for these types of examples with a woman who has clear, unmistakable, objective indicators of expertise (literal astronaut) in the topic at hand is that the ratio is much higher for women than men, in a way that might not have been obvious for lesser credentials (like a high school science teacher). But yet, it still happens.

It's a name for a phenomenon that has existed for a long time. It's a concise way to describe that phenomenon, and I still think it's a good word to have in the vocabulary.

[-] ozymandias@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 20 minutes ago

pssssh, sounds like typical Womanplaining….
that’s where a woman complains too much….
you see, in a typical post by a Man, they will get on average 15 complaints by women, but in a post by a woman, only five complaints by women… now you can’t tell which posts are Womanplaining and which ones are genuine complaints, but i think inventing new terms with “woman” and “man” attached to the front are the perfect way to achieve harmony between the sexes and don’t just reinforce sexism.
/s
all satire.
but, “mansplain” is hate speech and it needs to stop.
sexist condescending speech of men towards women is hateful and needs to stop as well….
inventing new slurs is counterproductive.

[-] Soup@lemmy.world 7 points 1 hour ago

(New person here)

The big issue is that we don’t see men being pedantic towards other men at nearly the same rate. Absolutely it happens, but there is definitely a problem with men not respecting women specifically.

Part of it, I think, comes from social conditioning and it’s more of a reaction than anything on purpose when it comes to a large subset of the people doing it. Even still, it’s important to gender it at least sometimes to highlight why we might be doing it and to give us the correct thing to reflect on. I’ve done it before where I could say it to a man but I realized that I what I was saying or doing was fueled, at least in part, by some internalized misogyny. Knowing that has helped me get to it before I do something stupid.

[-] pahlimur@lemmy.world 1 points 35 minutes ago

Men are the most pedantic assholes to other men.

Treating women like they are soft little creatures is insanely sexist. Treat them as equals and they will treat you the same. I don't understand why it's so hard for other men to understand this.

[-] kryptonianCodeMonkey@lemmy.world 4 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

Sure, but being an arrogant prick that thinks they're smarter than anyone else, regardless of gender, is already a thing that should be derided. Having only a single or few instances of this behavior being aimed at women as an example of his arrogance may mistakenly lead one to attribute that to misogyny instead of a general prickishness behavior, sure. But that's a perfectly understandable assumption to make in that situation and the mistake of calling them the wrong kind of asshole, I feel, is less of a concern than him, indeed, being an asshole.

[-] NotANumber@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 hour ago

You can do that without calling someone sexist.

[-] kryptonianCodeMonkey@lemmy.world 3 points 59 minutes ago* (last edited 47 minutes ago)

Sure. But it gives the appearance of sexism. Who gives a fuck if he is being an asshole if you mislabeled the kind of asshole he is. I don't.

[-] Gustephan@lemmy.world 3 points 46 minutes ago

You kinda should. The entire value of shaming people is to show a person that somebody else or a group of somebody elses do not approve of their behaviour. If you dont care about being accurate in calling out antisocial behaviour, how do you think the person expressing said antisocial behaviour will understand that interaction? Do you think they'll be able to understand what they did wrong? Obviously thats not always relevant, some people just want to mudwrestle and they'll never hear you no matter what you say. It's worth it to be accurate in case they are the type of person who might remotely consider your words though

[-] kryptonianCodeMonkey@lemmy.world 3 points 43 minutes ago* (last edited 12 minutes ago)

If you dont care about being accurate in calling out antisocial behaviour, how do you think the person expressing said antisocial behaviour will understand that interaction?

If they were being sexist and you don't point that out, wouldn't that be inaccurate?

[-] ozymandias@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 18 minutes ago

it would be incomplete, not inaccurate.
it is much better to be incomplete than inaccurate.

[-] Gustephan@lemmy.world 1 points 37 minutes ago

Yes, it would. It's also not related to the comment I replied to, in which you stated that you dont care about being accurate when calling somebody out. My point is that you should care about accuracy when youre calling out bad behaviour, I'm not trying to defend Mr "actually it would be spontaneous" from the image

[-] kryptonianCodeMonkey@lemmy.world 2 points 22 minutes ago* (last edited 21 minutes ago)

Sure, my point was that a single instance outside of other context means that you cannot necessarily discern a pattern of behavior upon which to base your conclusion into which kind of asshole he is being. You could be innacurate in assuming he is sexist as well as assuming he isn't. If complete accuracy is required, then you would need to not make a conclusion at all and let the comment slide without feedback until you have more data. I'm saying that it is more important to call them out than to worry about the exact accuracy, to not let the comment slide, to make sure they know that, in some way, it was inappropriate.

One's experience may lead one to make some assumptions that are incorrect in this context, but I don't feel like that is the important part that you should critique. Either she says nothing, calls him a sexist, or calls him out but doesnt point out the sexism even if there is unconfirmed sexism involved. I'm saying either of the latter is reasonable under the circumstances.

[-] Gustephan@lemmy.world 1 points 4 minutes ago

It's not about making a value judgement on a person, its about calling out a specific behaviour. As a thought experiment, would you have engaged with me if I came at you like "you're an idiot" (making a value judgement on you as a person) rather than specifically addressing the behaviour you exhibited that I disagree with?

To be clear, I have no negative opinions of you and I absolutely do not think you're an idiot. That was posed purely as a hypothetical to illustrate the difference in communication effectiveness between making a value judgement about a person and addressing a specific behaviour.

[-] moakley@lemmy.world 2 points 49 minutes ago

Sometimes people are being sexist. Mansplaining is a real thing that happens. You may not see the need for the word because you personally don't need it, but maybe you can understand that there a lot of people who do need it?

[-] ozymandias@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 28 minutes ago

everyone knows that.
you just explained very common knowledge to people that certainly know it.
the problem is the terminology…
men and women condescendingly explain shit to people all the time. If you attach the word “man” to it then you’re being sexist.
when a man is condescending to a woman because she’s a woman, then that man is being sexist.
if you assume every time a man is being condescending to a woman they’re being sexist, then you’re sexist.
every time ANYONE makes a factual claim on the internet and it gets enough traction, someone will chime in and condescendingly explain why they’re wrong. gender is not the only factor.
….
it’s certainly terrible how men are sexist and condescending towards women so often… making a new sexist term doesn’t help that problem.
also, i’m not assuming your gender and you don’t know mine, i am merely disagreeing with you.

[-] yarr@feddit.nl 18 points 2 hours ago

Did you just mansplain mansplaining!?

When will men learn to stop trying to share information?!

[-] Baked86@lemmy.world 3 points 1 hour ago

He's just trying to combat misinformation, the gall to accuse someone of sexism after being wrong is staggering.

[-] kryptonianCodeMonkey@lemmy.world 3 points 49 minutes ago

She wasn't wrong though. It does happen spontaneously in that it is happening without apparent external cause. There is an external cause, the change in pressure, but it is not apparent. And most people are aware that water boils at low pressures at room temps. He even said it was "basic thermo", so of course a NASA astronaut would know about this basic scientific phenomenon, as would most people.

[-] yermaw@sh.itjust.works 3 points 4 hours ago

Is there a better term for it?

I feel like mansplaining as a word is similar to feminism as a word. It has assumption of gender rooted into it but its gone past that at this point.

[-] Nelots@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

but its gone past that at this point

Maybe it shouldn't. I doubt people would like the word feminism being used if it inherently painted women as sexist.

[-] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 74 points 12 hours ago

The mansplaining thing in this context is more about an unfounded assumption of ignorance in the other party. Usually one would assume an astronaut to know basic thermodynamics, but the tweet's phrasing implies the other other person doesn't. It's less "you're wrong" and more "why do you think she doesn't know that."

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] giantripdrop@piefed.social 18 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago)

I just saw a person in a suit, then read the "mansplaining" comment, then went back and saw the posters name.

It feels so forced or I am just oblivious. I thought the response was an asshole being an "acktuallllllly" response.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Ilovethebomb@sh.itjust.works 111 points 13 hours ago

developing or occurring without apparent external influence, force, cause, or treatment

Pretty much the definition of spontaneous if you ask me.

[-] Evil_Shrubbery@thelemmy.club 2 points 1 hour ago

Yes, afaik in science community that is in fact the correct use of the word, meaning from "environmental" conditions (well, it's test conditions for the environment in this case) and not from an active, localised influence.

load more comments (16 replies)
[-] Gladaed@feddit.org 10 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago)

It's a pedantic take that makes sense and is fun. It relies on spontaneous having multiple meanings.

A spontaneous person randomly does weird things. A spontaneous occurring change happens without the environment promoting it.

There is no man's planning. This is willful ignorance to enable a joke.

Edit: literally Kev M

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 28 Aug 2025
613 points (100.0% liked)

Science Memes

16461 readers
2725 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS