If they're not great, it's your fault /thread 😅
This is some rose tinted glasses shit 🤣
Look there are benefits but there is also a lot of garbage. Y'all just try to hand wave this shit away. The only reason desktop is even usable to most users is Gabe pouring literally billions of dollars into the ecosystem serving his personal vendetta against Microsoft. Y'all STILL ignore the meh state of Linux desktop while ignoring the garbage state it was in before Gabe sent his developers to the community.
None of this would be possible without valve stealing 30% of gaming revenue with their monopoly.
NONE of the meaningful work was done for free or customers. It was done by a highly paid corporate army backed by one of the biggest monopolies in tech.
Don't even get me started on "cool features" as if most the software is even close in parity.
I'm kinda confused by this comment. The fact that open source isn't perfect doesn't mean co-maps can't explain why open source is valuable, given that it's a relevant part of the appeal of their project...
Like you're not wrong that the Linux desktop is far from perfect, but it kinda feels like you're just frustrated frequently one talks about it (which is fair, open source spaces can be a bit of a evangelistic circle-jerk. I say this as someone who loves foss), and this post prompted you to vent about that somewhat unrelatedly
I might be misunderstanding the point you're trying to convey...
I get the impression you think corporations aren't major open source contributors.
Gaming is an even small fraction desktop linux use. Desktop linux is an even smaller fraction of FOSS.
They aren't. Not outside the server/product realm. This thread is opened when an image of comaps and references users. Not sure why you've excluded them. And I've certainly never heard to NGinx referred to as an app. That term typically sits in under space.
How much money is coming in from corporate contributions on Linux gnome after you remove valve?
I didn't actually expect an easy answer there, but I'd bet it's almost next to nothing.
So what was wrong about my comment again?
Linux kernel for example:
By changesets
Huawei Technologies 1281 9.2%
Intel 1254 9.0%
(Unknown) 1097 7.9%
Google 917 6.6%
Linaro 837 6.0%
AMD 750 5.4%
Red Hat 672 4.8%
(None) 564 4.0%
Meta 414 3.0%
NVIDIA 389 2.8%
SUSE 333 2.4%
Oracle 318 2.3%
NXP Semiconductors 275 2.0%
IBM 260 1.9%
Renesas Electronics 224 1.6%
(Consultant) 208 1.5%
Microchip Technology Inc. 192 1.4%
Arm 187 1.3%
MediaTek 164 1.2%
Collabora 144 1.0%
By lines changed
Oracle 91852 12.0%
AMD 89761 11.7%
Google 56504 7.4%
Intel 44062 5.8%
(Unknown) 33765 4.4%
Realtek 33277 4.3%
Linaro 31234 4.1%
Huawei Technologies 27856 3.6%
NVIDIA 25441 3.3%
Red Hat 24073 3.1%
(None) 21498 2.8%
Meta 18783 2.5%
MediaTek 17599 2.3%
NXP Semiconductors 14342 1.9%
SUSE 13749 1.8%
Brocade 12154 1.6%
Microchip Technology Inc. 11651 1.5%
Pengutronix 10200 1.3%
Broadcom 8054 1.1%
Marvell 8036 1.0%
Absolutely worthless metric without the projects. I'm guessing 99% of those are driven by corporate/product.
Your guess.
Do you have an useful metric that shows what sub systems they are working on?
It is there to check if you aren't satisfied with the provided stats.
Before pushing for further evidence, the burden of proof is currently on you, as in why the stats I provided wouldn't be sufficient.
Whatever you need to believe getting through the day 🤣
Meta is definitely on a quest to add features to sonaar 🤣
Lol
CoMaps
Cooperative community open-source fork of Organic Maps, an offline privacy-respecting not-for-profit OpenStreetMap GPS app for your phone.