110
I don't understand why anyone would buy this when you can build a PC that's 2-3x as capable for the same price, that's actually repairable and upgradable.
Likely to support those ideas and signal that there is money in it. I'm not big on "letting the market figure it out", but there is logic in voting with your wallet.
I bought a System 76 for similar reason five years back. The price was comparable to a XPS, came with coreboot, and disabled Intel ME.
What ideas? The whole idea is that they're repairable/upgradable. The went into a market where those things already existed and stripped them away. Why?
I don't expect this to change your mind (I also wouldn't really want a framework desktop), but the framework desktop is fairly unique in terms of performance, which is why they stripped away some of the upgradability.
I want that upgradability more than unique performance, but to their credit they did try to make it work with socketed ram, but they couldn't get it to work because in order to share RAM between the CPU and GPU in the way they wanted (I think, I haven't looked at it super closely because I don't want one and am not in the market for a desktop cause I'm broke and have a laptop), they needed ridiculously low latency and even the new upcoming socket design they played with to get it working wasn't able to get the latency low enough, even with tweaks if I understand correctly.
I'll stick to building a conventional system if I get around to building a desktop, but to my understanding the performance of the framework desktop is higher than it looks on paper because of its funky design that needed ultra low latency memory. Its a cool product, but I do think perhaps framework were not entirely the right people to sell it, as repairability and upgradability are a massive cornerstone of their brand.
they stripped away some of the upgradability.
They stripped away pretty much all of it.
they couldn't get it to work because in order to share RAM between the CPU and GPU in the way they wanted
Then they shouldn't have made it. That's their whole shtick, and it only took them a few years to go back on it.
It's not like those speeds deliver any sort of practical advantage anyway, like I said earlier. Especially not in gaming.
It's just a lazy cash grab.
Yeah, I don't really disagree. Though I do think it's more upgradeable than if another company made the same sort of product, given you can upgrade the motherboard. But I have no real interest in it. It doesn't feel like a lazy cash grab to me. But it does feel like they're confused about who's actually buying their devices and what those people want.
Though, who knows, maybe they're selling great. What do I know. I'll stick to the industry standard of socketed components in a standard case format rather than a new novel design that can't be as upgradable.
- 128GB unified RAM
- 16 cores / 32 threads
- small form factor (4.5L)
- similar/lower power consumption than my current daily driver despite much more powerful hardware (a lot of my parts are 10 or more years old...)
- officially supports Linux
- <$2K USD (not counting NVME and peripherals)
That combo was interesting enough to me to order one to mess around with. I could build a more powerful (but probably more energy hungry...) computer in a traditional desktop form factor. I don't think I could build a better SFF computer myself though, and I'm really curious to see just how far I can push the integrated GPU in this thing...
officially supports linux
Comparing to just building a desktop, I don't think you can easily build one that isn't officially supported on linux...?
The unified memory is the only part of this machine that can't be had for way cheaper with a custom build, and it's interesting only for super niche reasons anyway.
Unified memory is very AI friendly which is not irrelevant these days.
No one said irrelevant. Running local AI is extremely niche though
Perhaps, but if one is privacy conscious, that's the way to do it. That is also one of the reasons people like Macs.
Anything to do with AI is inherently irrelevant.
It's hard to build one that you can't make work, but a lot of manufacturers don't actually officially support it. It's a minor point, but one I care about -- especially when dealing with new hardware. I'd have wasted a lot more time trying to debug what was going on with Mint if they hadn't documented the need for a 6.11 kernel on their website, for example...
lot of manufacturers don't actually officially support it
Huh???
Intel and AMD CPUs are officially supported in the linux kernel... AMD's official graphics driver is part of the linux kernel. NVIDIA offers official graphics drivers for linux, although they are proprietary.
I'd have wasted a lot more time trying to debug what was going on with Mint if they hadn't documented the need for a 6.11 kernel on their website, for example...
6.11 kernel
So... in other words... it literally is supported by the linux kernel...
I was thinking of motherboards. Some of my systems have really fucking annoying power problems. If I can't get this thing to suspend properly, for example, I can go back to Framework and try to get them to fix it. My cobbled together desktop? I'm on my own.
The only thing I could see being an issue with a desktop motherboard are built-in wifi, bluetooth, or sound chips, and that's really not been an issue to worry about for years. Complete non-issue for any Intel chipsets, which are basically all officially supported. I think otherwise I really only see like Realtek, which is supported. At worst you just need to install proprietary drivers.
Sounds like framework's motherboard has poorly implemented ACPI, but this would not be an issue for manufacturers for typical desktop hardware (ASUS, ASRock, MSI, Gigabyte)
I'm not complaining about Framework's HW there; my old desktop (which uses an ASUS MB, IIRC) had that issue. I'm on my own figuring out WTF is going wrong between the CPU, the kernel, quirks of the motherboard, BIOS, GPU -- or whatever else might be causing it to enter a boot loop if I try to suspend and then resume the system.
If I had a similar problem with the Framework system, I could go to Framework and say "Fix it!" and expect to get help because they officially support the configuration. That's my point.
Last two mainboards I bought had incompatible wifi cards. The first of those also had some weird issue with aspm that meant it ran hotter than it should have needed to.
Plenty of hardware won't work on Linux. Especially new hardware. Sometimes there are issues with WiFi, Bluetooth, audio, graphics, etc. So it's nice to know that if it's not working that the device is, in fact, not functioning as intended and that the company that you purchased it from will help make it right, rather than just saying "ah no one cares about Linux, sorry!".
Maybe this comment would have been accurate 10 years ago.
Would you like to explain? That's been my lived experience with only a handful of devices.
It's okay to concede that Linux isn't perfect.
You can build a pc with a minisforum BD795i SE (also an integrated CPU, but not LPDDR RAM, its a standard desktop mobo but small, itx, and you can't remove the 7945hx CPU)) and an AMD 9070, for under $1500, (thats including everything in the pc) and that'll do basically everything you could possibly want at 1440p.
I have a wish list on newegg that is just barely above $1500 (at least pretax), including also a decently good 32", curved 1440p monitor.
These kinds of uh, high grade laptop cpu but on an other wise standard, but small pc mobo, that can be the size of a large lunch box... these are pretty common in China, but fairly few in the West seem to have caught on.
PC part picker still doesnt even list these mobos in the right way, you can't plan a build with them, because wtf its a mobo and a cpu at the ssme time? That breaks how our website works!
For gaming, yes.
But the Framework Desktop seems to be made for a different usecase:
128GB of unified RAM
Unified means both CPU and GPU have access to it. Why would you need so much RAM and why would you care if the GPU has direct access?
Neural Networks. You can fit a pretty serious LLM into 128GB of RAM, and if GPU has direct access, still run inference at reasonable performance.
I love my 9070XT, but you can't run anything approaching what Claude or ChatGPT gives you in just 16GB of VRAM
the Framework Desktop seems to be made for a different usecase
They specifically advertise it as a gaming device. The author of this article is using it as a gaming device.
You can fit a pretty serious LLM
LLMs are fucking stupid and no one should use them.
You are absolutely right. Baffles me why they'd put 128GB of RAM in there and use an SoC arhitecture where RAM is shared with GPU, to the detriment of upgradability, if not for AI.
Any gamer would prefer upgradable RAM and upgradable GPU, especially from Framework.
How else would you explain this decision to compromise their brand values and overspend on RAM, if not AI?
... I mean... 128 gb of shared ram could be used that way...
But... you really think this is a common enough use case to design a pc around?
Like... how many people want to game, vs... run / train a local LLM?
Is this what Framework is doing, making LLM development boxes?
Not... trying to make an affordable, general use oriented, 'buy once and then upgrade with parts/modules as you prefer'?
Except for the small form factor I bought a second hand PC with those specs for £300. I think the only reasons to buy it are you really want small form factor, or you want to play with local AI and don't want to use a Mac (which is still better value for money on that front).
Not to downplay the small form factor - I do think that is cool. Just... Not £1k cool.
Framework is a scam. Components you are likely to actually change out are just as upgradeable/replaceable as any other laptop with non-soldered components (keyboard, drives, memory, battery, wireless adapters, screen). In order to upgrade a part like CPU, you still have to replace the whole motherboard and pay a premium close to the cost of a laptop, anyway. At that point, what is the value of holding onto a likely-several-years-old case and screen that have probably suffered wear and tear...? It doesn't really make any sense...
You nailed it for the desktop. The only reason why someone should buy one is because they specifically want this AMD APU for unified memory that comes in it
Bring on the downvotes by fanboys coping with buyers' remorse
Components you are likely to actually change out are just as upgradeable/replaceable as any other laptop with non-soldered components
Which other laptop let's you swap out the main board? Or the mobile GPU? Which other brand open sources their designs, schematics and repair manuals? Which other brand let's you pick and choose your storage, ram, display, keyboard, etc. (or none at all), all at market value? Nah. Framework laptops are great (albeit way too expensive).
I think the desktop was a chance to capitalize on AI nonsense for profit. When it came to the RAM they were like "well we really tried to make it repairable but AMD said they couldn't do it but oh well we just shipped it anyway 🤷"
Which other laptop let's you swap out the main board?
I mean my point is that you're realistically never going to do this, because its a huge premium and costs about the same as a new laptop... why swap a brand new mainboard into an old and worn out laptop...
Which other brand let's you pick and choose your storage, ram, display, keyboard, etc.
Uhhhh literally all of them??? Every laptop I've owned was built by customizing all the individual components on the manufacturers website.
My laptop (KFocus brand) is like 8 phillips screws, the back comes off, and there's full easy access to memory, drives, and network cards for simple replacement. Pretty sure it's fewer screws than framework lol
its a huge premium and costs about the same as a new laptop...
It doesn't.
Uhhhh literally all of them???
Show me.
Lol okay!
Lenovo website > Make your own PC page > select base model (choice of screen and keyboard) > Build your PC button (choice of other components)
Dell website > choose base model > Explore Options > Build Your Own > Customize now button
HP website > choose base model > Customize & Buy button
KFocus website > choose base model > all components must be configured before you can order
...no? None of those allow you the same breadth of options.
Yes... they literally all do... 🤦
Here, let's go through them each together:
Which other brand let's you pick and choose your storage, ram, display, keyboard, etc.
Choice of storage? Yup.
Choice of memory? Yup.
Choice of display? Yup.
Choice of keyboard? Yup.
Choice of OS/battery/secondary drives/power adapter? Yup.
🙃
Not the person you replied to but I looked at lenovo when I bought my framework. I grew up with thinkpads as my dad was an IBMer. This was my first non-thinkpad.
Thin and lights in the same category as the framework laptops absolutely do not have choice of all of those components to the same degree. Increasingly Ram is even partially sodered, leaving one sodimm for upgradability, and there certainly wasn't an option to leave out components and bring off the shelf parts, making the entire market of socketed components available to you for configuration on a framework (something I was excited I could take advantage of, and that saved me a decent chunk of money as a broke person who needed a new laptop.). I don't recall there being anywhere near as many keyboard layouts.
The thinkpax carbon x1 literally has all soldered RAM. Two keyboard layouts. An included network card with optional mobile broadband. One display with touch or one without. And it's unclear if the ssd is socketed though I'd guess it is. But you have to buy it from them though and it's ludicrously expensive.
And a new motherboard is very explicitly not as expensive as a new laptop, with the current top spec amd main board being $700 cheaper than the same laptop with base configuration. Its less than 50% of the price of the base spec.
You're talking out of your ass. Maybe lenovo has some options in the same category with more socketed components, I'm not going to go digging for then for the purposes of this argument. Many people might be better served by those if they're an option (though they're almost guaranteedly much more expensive, as thinkpads in general are much more expensive for the specs you get), but if what you want is upgradeability and repairability, no, lenovo very explicitly doesn't compare, I compared them as I was shopping. I loved my thinkpads. They treated me well. They weren't what I was looking for though, and I'm very excited that I can now upgrade my cpu and/or RAM in 5-10 years when I need an upgrade. I could not do that with a thinkpad.
Edit: just checked the T and E series and although they have socketed ram they also don't have the same breadth of options or upgradability. Lenovo still makes amazing laptops, and I'm sure either of those would serve people well (though the T series is not really a direct competitior to the main framework 13" line), but if you want what a framework offers, you would not be as happy with the thinkpads.
Yeah I'm obviously not comparing to soldered components, so most of your comment is completely irrelevant.
The options you're claiming can't be configured, 1) literally can be, or 2) are silly novelties
$700 cheaper than a ridiculously overpriced laptop? Wow totally great point. 😂
I'm yet to be proven wrong. Enjoy holding onto an old beat up laptop case over the years for... reasons... totally worth it
The first other laptop with the same cpu to come up in a search is around the same price when specced similarly, and isn't repairable.
Their lowest spec main board in a PC with base spec is $1099 for:
13.5" 2256x1504 60Hz Matte Display
16GB Memory
256GB Storage
Windows 11 Home
1-year limited warranty
That motherboard is 449. You're talking out of your ass and either your troll is showing or you're actually an idiot lol. Every motherboard sku is comparably affordable compared to the built laptops. And the built laptops are not unreasonably priced for their specs, given their quality and features (among which is upgradeability and repairability, something I'm willing to pay more for.)
It's not a novelty to me that I can change my ports if I get into a creative hobby that benefits from having an SD card slot, or if all my peripherals move to type c, or if I get a setup where displayport is more valuable than my current hdmi (or I could literally have both if need be). Its certainly not a novelty to me that I can upgrade my cpu years down the line. And most thin and lights in the same product category have soldered components. The Dell thin and light, the xps 13, also has soldered RAM.
I really don't care if you want one. I don't like throwing things away, I like repairing them instead. I like mending my clothes. When I have a home and have appliances I will take joy in getting them fixed. I like keeping my old devices going for as long as possible. My last phone until upgrading a year ago was a pixel 3. My previous thinkpad was from 2013, and I only didn't bother to get it fixed when it broke because it's specs were no longer keeping up, even on Linux. I like not contributing to e-waste. Not having to replace my laptop outright is worth money to me because it saves me money and is consistent with my desire to take care of the things I own rather than getting rid of and replacing them.
That doesn't matter to you and that's fine. But to call it a scam because you personally don't value its core value proposition is dumb. And you look silly for arguing as such while simultaneously saying "you haven't proven me wrong"
Sick. Buy something else lol. It's obviously not the right product for your needs, that's fine. Why try to convince everyone that it's somehow wrong for theirs too when they're happy with it? Have a nice day.
and isn't repairable
If the components aren't soldered, then yes, it is. 🤦 My laptop is actually easier to repair than a framework is.
The ports are the silliest of the novelties lol. My laptop just has the ports I need, including an SD reader, and I didn't have to pay outrageous prices for each port...
The core value proposition is a scam that is not realistic or cost effective for 99.9% of framework laptop owners. Fact.
If the components aren't soldered, then yes, it is. 🤦 My laptop is actually easier to repair than a framework is.
You're evidently a moron, and completely misunderstood what I typed.
Fact.
Thats not what a fact is. its a fact that thats an oppinion; your troll is showing again. This is not worth my energy, have a nice day.
Loses the argument and resorts to name calling... classic
It is a fact that by the time a CPU upgrade is warranted and you have to replace literally the entirety of the guts of the laptop (because the CPU is soldered...), besides the hard drive and maybe the RAM if you get really lucky with the upgrade path, the rest of the parts will have no value and will be worn, either needing refresh too, or not worth holding onto. For 99.9% it makes more sense to just buy a new laptop (for literally cheaper than framework) at that point
Trolling is only effective is no one can tell you're trolling.
I'm "trolling" yet you're the one failing to address my argument and also the one calling names... sorry you got duped and overpaid for a laptop that you're likely going to just end up throwing out and replacing for cheaper...
It doesn’t.
Well... Not from Framework. I looked one up and it was £700 for the main board or £1300 for the whole laptop. Or I could get a laptop with the exact same CPU (Ryzen AI 7 350) from Asus for £800. I mean, sure it's probably not as good a laptop. But even so... If your laptop breaks are you going to spend £700 on a new main board that might fix it, or £800 on a new laptop that definitely works.
It definitely doesn't make sense for upgrading - you can just sell the old laptop and buy a new one if you want to upgrade.
Tbh I hope they succeed still, but it's really hard to compete with the sheer pricing power of less modular products.
Well... Not from Framework.
That's...what we were discussing?
I looked one up and it was £700 for the main board or £1300 for the whole laptop.
That's...nearly half the price.
I mean, sure it's probably not as good a laptop.
Oops, half the price and also not comparable.
If your laptop breaks are you going to spend £700 on a new main board that might fix it, or £800 on a new laptop that definitely works.
I'm definitely going to pay the 700 to have a better laptop rather than the 800 on a disposable laptop from a company with the worst reputation for customer/warranty support in the business.
You have to be prepared to keep them long term in order for them to make sense.
It definitely doesn't make sense for upgrading
It definitely does. And you've just demonstrated exactly how. If you don't care about money or quality or respect then maybe it doesn't to you.
I dunno, I have a Framework laptop and had a keyboard issue with it. It still worked, but one of the keys didn’t register well. So they sent me a new keyboard and I sent them back the old one after I’d swapped it. Not a single day was I without my laptop, which sounds quite unlikely compared to other laptop brands and the support you get (or not) with those. No buyer’s remorse here.
A long Hdmi cord got me there way easier I think.
My pre-order from February just arrived, so I've been poking at it a bit this weekend. I tried putting Linux Mint on it first. It booted but had issues (e.g. ethernet wasn't detected -- although WiFi worked fine); seems like the 6.8 kernel is too old. I've got Fedora on it instead now, and that seems to be working better so far.
Fedora is the new Ubuntu.
cachyos has kernels specifically for these AMD chips, if Fedora gives you problems or if you wanna try an Arch distro, I've been enjoying cachyos on my ryzen 395 laptop
this post was submitted on 25 Aug 2025
110 points (100.0% liked)
Linux
9303 readers
250 users here now
A community for everything relating to the GNU/Linux operating system (except the memes!)
Also, check out:
Original icon base courtesy of lewing@isc.tamu.edu and The GIMP
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS