22
top 14 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] LuckingFurker 31 points 2 days ago

Says the man who cosied up to David fucking Cameron for 5 years, I don't think Nick Clegg is a good judge of who exactly is a monster

[-] Tweak@feddit.uk 2 points 1 day ago

"It's fine. That pig was dead when he got his hands on it, he didn't feel any pain."

[-] Infernal_pizza@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 2 days ago

And yet somehow that was still the best government we've had in the last 15 years :(

[-] LuckingFurker 12 points 2 days ago

Jesus that's a depressing realisation. How did it get worse from Cameron and Clegg? But somehow it did

[-] wewbull@feddit.uk 3 points 2 days ago

He can't see the wood for the trees. I think he thinks that just because the people he worked with day to day were personable and pleasant to be around, that means the company mission isn't corrupting society.

[-] LuckingFurker 1 points 2 days ago

Or... he's just a monster himself. Better at hiding it, arguably

[-] ctry21@sh.itjust.works 25 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

The same man who pledged to abolish tuition fees, immediately abandoned that pledge to gain power, tripled them instead, and was then caught afterwards having already scrapped the plan to abolish them internally while still publicly campaigning on it?

However, leaked documents revealed that the Lib Dems had actually planned to abandon their tuition fee pledge before the election even took place.

A month before Clegg promised to get rid of the “dead weight of debt,” senior insiders said the party should “leave” the pledge before entering any negotiations to form a coalition government, saying: “Let us not cause ourselves more headaches.”

That article is an interesting read on how the big three keep lying through their teeth on tuition fees as well. And how the National Union of Students opposed tuition fees for over a decade until the now-health secretary Wes Streeting became their general secretary.

[-] Tweak@feddit.uk 2 points 1 day ago

"Lies. There's been too many of them lately."

That was literally how his campaign video started.

[-] mannycalavera@feddit.uk 21 points 2 days ago

‘If the people who ran Facebook ~~were monsters~~ didn't pay me a shit tonne of money, I wouldn’t have worked there

Fixed it for you, cleggers.

[-] ratel@mander.xyz 4 points 2 days ago

Fuck this guy - Coming across all polite, well spoken, talking out his arse about how he tried to make big changes in politics and introduce positive reform at fucking Meta when in reality he sold his values for 4 years in the (shadow of the) spotlight and sold his soul for a fat salary.

I'm still mad I voted for him in 2010.

[-] echodot@feddit.uk 2 points 2 days ago

I never trusted the lip dams I still don't. They never seem to actually have a position on anything.

Like seriously what are they doing right now for example? Labour being an absolute disaster they have every opportunity to show the country that they are an alternative, that they could be in opposition instead of the conservatives and what are they doing, absolutely nothing.

[-] ratel@mander.xyz 1 points 1 day ago

Yeah exactly! At the time I remember they felt like a breath of fresh air, coming out of the Blair/Brown Labour government, and then they were such a let down in the coalition. I have no idea what they have been up to since then - they could be countering all the unpopular things current Labour are doing. It seems like there're no good left options at the moment.

[-] jonne@infosec.pub 17 points 2 days ago

Said the guy whose previous job was to prop up Cameron's conservative government?

[-] cupcakezealot@piefed.blahaj.zone 12 points 2 days ago

monster says people he worked with aren't monsters

this post was submitted on 23 Aug 2025
22 points (100.0% liked)

UK Politics

4187 readers
134 users here now

General Discussion for politics in the UK.
Please don't post to both !uk_politics@feddit.uk and !unitedkingdom@feddit.uk .
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric politics, and should be either a link to a reputable news source for news, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread. (These things should be publicly discussed)

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS