107
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] HKayn@dormi.zone 95 points 1 year ago

Can you please stop editorializing titles?

[-] spacedance@sh.itjust.works 64 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

You heard a cool new word and used it where it doesn't work, this feature isn't bad at all. If Signal didn't alienate a large number of users by removing SMS maybe switching would be more viable.

[-] fernandofig@reddthat.com 26 points 1 year ago

If Signal didn't alienate a large number of users by removing SMS maybe switching would be more viable.

This. I hate Whatsapp, but I have to use it because that's what everybody else (where I live) uses, so either I cave, or be Incommunicable by everyone and get used to explaining why while sounding like a dork.

I used Signal because, although a very small set of friends used it, I had an excuse to keep it because it handled SMS, and so I could keep it in the hopes that eventually WA would shoot itself in the foot and people would finally migrate, but since they removed SMS, why the hell would I hold on to it if I'd have no reason to other that I like it?

[-] admin@lemmy.my-box.dev 14 points 1 year ago

In my experience, people might raise an eyebrow when you say you don't have WhatsApp, but I never had to explain myself. Even then, saying "I don't trust Facebook" will make most people understand.

[-] Arghblarg@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 year ago

I don't know the technical issues, buy couldn't a fork of Signal revive SMS support? I would switch to such a fork and help everyone I know also do so.

[-] xodoh74984@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

Turning a messaging app for myself and friends into a data farming social media app full of paid promotions is absolutely the definition of enshittification.

[-] d3Xt3r@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

The enshittification actually began several years ago, back when FB bought WhatsApp. That was the moment you gave up on privacy, the moment that was a clear sign that it was all going to go downhill from there. If y'all didn't quit WhatsApp at that time, then you bought it upon yourselves. The truth is, you've been using a shitty service for a long time and whoring your data to Meta and making Zuckerberg richer, so this latest feature bloat or w/e isn't the least bit interesting.

[-] xodoh74984@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Unofficially, yes probably. But officially Facebook only upped the ante on user data connection from WhatsApp more recently according to their privacy policy. Sorry, "Meta"

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Bye@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Yes I dropped signal when it stopped supporting sms. That was a really dumb choice and I honestly don’t know why they did it

[-] Ironfist@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 year ago

I'm curious, why that feature was so important for you?

[-] Bye@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

Because 90%+ of my contacts use sms (USA) and keeping touch across multiple apps is a huge pain. Like remembering which contact uses which service is stupid.

[-] circuitfarmer@lemmy.sdf.org 4 points 1 year ago

alienate a large number of users by removing SMS

Would you mind elaborating on this?

SMS in Signal was never secure (it's SMS), and so it was removed. Now I have private messaging in Signal, and if some one sends me an SMS, it shows up in my stock texting app. No false sense of security and it's very easy to use 2 apps.

[-] darreninthenet@sh.itjust.works 57 points 1 year ago

Unless I've missed something I don't see how this makes WhatsApp worse...? Just don't sign up to the people's channels if you don't want to 🤷🏻‍♂️

[-] xodoh74984@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago

This is the beginning of monetizing the app after they started collecting user data a few months back. The more aggressively they decide to monetize, the more aggressive they'll be about pushing promoted content. Remember when Instagram had no ads?

That's how this works. And they're certainly not going to choose to make less money off of their app over time with the market dominance that they have. Why would they when users will continue to use it?

[-] admin@lemmy.my-box.dev 20 points 1 year ago

How is this turning it into a data farm? It did that when it plundered your address book, and kept track of who you messaged when.

Sure, they will probably stay monetizing it a few years from now, but right now they aren't. Enshittification is a term with a very specific meaning, and it does not mean "features I don't like".

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] RanchOnPancakes@lemmy.world 31 points 1 year ago

I don't get why everyone isn't on signal. Its kind of a no brainier.

[-] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 13 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I only text people I know IRL and none of them are tech literate enough to use something other than the default messenger app, let alone hack anything to obtain sensitive info. And if a 3rd party wants to hack my messages, they're gonna see a LOTTA penis and not anything important, so fuck it.

[-] naeap@sopuli.xyz 6 points 1 year ago

So, they also don't use WhatsApp, Instagram and so on, because they would need to install an app? Oo
Why even bother with a smart phone? WAP and MMS should suffice...

load more comments (1 replies)

Signal doesn't have a marketing department worth billions or synergy with any popular platforms

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] FaceDeer@kbin.social 27 points 1 year ago

What's enshitty about this?

[-] manapropos@lemmy.basedcount.com 35 points 1 year ago

Nothing, OP just wanted an excuse to use the buzzword of current year

[-] xodoh74984@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

No, this is absolutely how it begins

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] xodoh74984@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago
[-] FaceDeer@kbin.social 16 points 1 year ago

I'm not seeing anything about monetization in this article, could you be more specific?

[-] xodoh74984@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

If you log into the app, you'll see promoted content from celebrities and organizations. What do you think drives those promotions?

It's either direct paid promotion, user data being sold to ad firms, or a combination.

[-] admin@lemmy.my-box.dev 9 points 1 year ago

Did you not read the article you posted yourself? You have to opt in to those channels.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] FaceDeer@kbin.social 7 points 1 year ago

I don't use WhatsApp, I only have this article to go off of. You need to include more context with editorialized titles like this.

[-] Zima@kbin.social 16 points 1 year ago

I will never switch to something that only treats phones as "primary device" and adds extra hassle to support PC as a "secondary device". I also find very concerning the lack of understanding of the value of anonimity even when communications are private, they even mock people that want privacy and anonimity.

another non-deal breaking but still telling issue is the lack of a clear roadmap for signal.

[-] xodoh74984@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

I also find it crazy that people don't understand the value of privacy. Telling people that Nissan wants to sell information about your sexual activity seemed to wake some of my social circle up. But only in the context of Nissan, which almost certainly doesn't have that data. Meta almost certainly does.

What sort of roadmap are you looking for in Signal? It does everything I need it to do, personally.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] gnygnygny@lemm.ee 5 points 1 year ago

Signal the anonymous messenger asking for your phone # to register... I didn't check if they changed that but it was such a good joke

[-] dack@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Who ever said signal is anonymous? Secure, private, encrypted - yes. But definitely not anonymous.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] thisisawayoflife@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago

Pretty sure WA started out pure shit and only got worse when Meta bought it.

[-] xodoh74984@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

I feel like this thread has been bombarded by the Zuckerberg defense brigade.

[-] sab@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago

"All I did was misrepresent something harmless, done by a company that's doing so much more horrible things that I shouldn't be using their product in the first place, and now people are calling me out on it. Clearly, they are wrong."

[-] mplewis@lemmy.globe.pub 4 points 1 year ago

What you posted isn’t enshittification.

[-] lustrum@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 year ago

I'd love to switch to Signal and I do have 1 contact there. Everyone else uses FB or whatsapp and just doesn't care. What am I supposed to do?

[-] Pons_Aelius@kbin.social 5 points 1 year ago

What am I supposed to do?

Decide if your privacy is more important than their convenience and your feelings of FOMO.

[-] lustrum@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 year ago

Right, but if I need to contact a friend or family. How am I supposed to do it without affecting privacy? If the other person doesn't use Signal or else.

[-] Pons_Aelius@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago

Honestly, go back to sms. It is the least worst option compared to FB.

[-] admin@lemmy.my-box.dev 2 points 1 year ago

Exactly. When FB announced their metadata harvesting plans for WhatsApp, I decided I didn't want to be part of the problem and deleted my account. You can't make people quit a platform by whining about it. I'm on signal, telegram and good ol' SMS if they want to reach me or vice versa.

[-] hahattpro@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

So, what the harm is Whatsapp channel ?

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 16 Sep 2023
107 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

59430 readers
2741 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS