250
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] m33@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 day ago

Sadly, as always, Lisp is put in parenthesis and doesn't show here

[-] DJKJuicy@sh.itjust.works 10 points 3 days ago
[-] littlebigendian@lemmy.zip 5 points 2 days ago

The hardest hitting rage bait I've seen all year

[-] VitabytesDev@feddit.nl 11 points 3 days ago

This is a very bad chart:

  • I don't understand what Toy Lang, Nu Lang or even System Lang mean
  • How are C and Assembly obsolete?
  • How is C++ more obsolete than D or Go?
  • PHP still powers a large portion of the internet, certainly not a "Toy Lang"
  • Why is ECMAScript here and not JavaScript?

Downvoting.

[-] mkwt@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago

This chart is easier to understand if you make the following substitutions:

  • Toy Lang --> high level language (except brainfuck really is a low level toy language)
  • System Lang --> low level language
  • Obsolete Lang --> old programming language, regardless of obsolescence status
  • Nu Lang --> newer programming language

After understanding this construction, I fail to find any humor in this.

Why is ECMAScript here and not JavaScript?

Among other things, "JavaScript" is a trademark of Oracle.

[-] VitabytesDev@feddit.nl 1 points 2 days ago

I fail to find any humour in this. I think the humour are the labels (Toy, System, Nu, Obsolete), which are however incorrect and misleading.

Among other things, "JavaScript" is a trademark of Oracle.

Does this prevent it from being used in memes?

[-] Scoopta@programming.dev 112 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Assembly being obsolete has to be the funniest joke in here. It fundamentally never will be even if its use is niche

[-] el_twitto@lemmy.world 51 points 4 days ago

...and C++ being obsolete is the second funniest.

[-] Ziglin@lemmy.world 12 points 4 days ago

It is clearly surpassed by C though this chart seems to have missed that fact.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] iAvicenna@lemmy.world 29 points 4 days ago

How is C or assembly obsolete when they are literally everywhere is beyond me

[-] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 9 points 4 days ago

C is more obsolete than Rust. Coding directly in assembly is rare. Beyond that it's more subjective.

[-] iAvicenna@lemmy.world 21 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

The C which is an integral part of every linux kernel on every computer and server running linux as the OS and all the embedded systems everywhere and almost all the performance critical parts of python libraries?

I won't have much to say about assembly since don't use it but far as I know low level parts of OS such as bootloader likely still uses assembly not to also mention embedded systems.

As long as both of these exist in embedded systems, it is just statistically weird to call it obsolete even in regards to other languages.

For instance data scientists majorly use python, but python critically depends on C and devices they use critically depend on C and assembly. Can you then really say what they do does not depend on C and assembly and python is more widely used?

[-] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 5 points 4 days ago

So, the Linux kernel is already partially moved over to Rust. It's probably in the Python ecosystem too, although I can't actually say.

More obsolete was a deliberate word choice. Hell, even COBOL is still used.

[-] iAvicenna@lemmy.world 6 points 4 days ago

yea but Rust is not above %80 of the languages in the chart. It is not just a matter of C being more obsolete than Rust it is more like C being one of the most obsolete in the chart. Can't call it that until it is replaced %80 by something else in systems that exists world-wide and everywhere.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] ozymandias117@lemmy.world 86 points 4 days ago

How are you defining "Obsolete" vs "Nu"?

e.g. Brainfuck from 1993 is all the way to Nu, while D (2001) and Rust (2012) are less "Nu"?

[-] lena@gregtech.eu 37 points 4 days ago

Also, what the hell is "nu" supposed to mean?

[-] Mika@sopuli.xyz 23 points 4 days ago
[-] subterfuge@lemmy.world 14 points 4 days ago

OP probably lived through the mid-1990s rise of “nu-metal” bands like Linkin Park

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] irelephant@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 3 days ago

Yes, SQL is but a toy language. It probably will never make it into production.

[-] KazuchijouNo@lemy.lol 63 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

AKA: How to annoy a bunch of computer nerds very quickly....

Make one for Linux distros next!!!

[-] nialv7@lemmy.world 23 points 4 days ago

By being wildly wrong you mean?

[-] Quetzalcutlass@lemmy.world 28 points 4 days ago

You say "wildly wrong", they say "incentivizing engagement".

[-] nialv7@lemmy.world 19 points 4 days ago
[-] Quetzalcutlass@lemmy.world 9 points 4 days ago

Precisely. Getting people upset is the foremost technique to farm engagement on social media. Sites such as Facebook even deliberately altered their algorithms to show content that will anger readers because it works so well to keep them invested.

Engagement bait is omnipresent and really obvious once you learn to spot it - even something as innocuous as one or two "accidental" typos in a meme to get people into the comments section.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] svcg 34 points 4 days ago

SQL isn't a toy language, it's a domain specific language.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Aquaphobi@lemmy.zip 28 points 4 days ago

And I bet this is based in opinion and not any sort of scientific understanding because you put assembly as an obsolete language…

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] cmnybo@discuss.tchncs.de 37 points 4 days ago

If everything written in those "obsolete" languages suddenly disappeared, the whole world would go dark.

[-] Adalast@lemmy.world 12 points 4 days ago

That doesn't stop them from being obsolete, it just means that people who have the "if it ain't broke, don't fix it" mentality can get fucked.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] moomoomoo309@programming.dev 47 points 4 days ago

Yeah, the axes on this are weird, why would the opposite of a systems language be a toy language? And why is Lua, a very popular and commonly used language in tons of stuff, a "toy"? And Lua is a nu Lang? It's older than Java, maybe it just feels newer because each release isn't necessarily backwards compatible?

[-] entropicdrift@lemmy.sdf.org 12 points 4 days ago

Also Python as a toy lang and somehow more "nu" than Java despite Java being younger?

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] rooroo@feddit.org 43 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

It wouldn’t be a good compass if nobody had strong issues with it:

  1. System vs Toy is not opposed to each other. Should have been system vs abstract or useful vs toy or whatever
  2. Where LISP? Best language missing makes graph bad

Edit: before people tell me there’s already ‘obsolete’ on the graph, no, there’s loads of obsolete languages that are still useful, and many more new languages that are either built for fun or not used for sad or good reasons.

Edit2: I’m also halfway sure that brainfuck is older than rust (but don’t wanna look it up). But if that’s true your axis mean several things at once anyway and you should feel bad (not really though).

[-] theunknownmuncher@lemmy.world 14 points 4 days ago

I literally opened it looking for Lisp and dismissed the whole thing when I realized its not there

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Jankatarch@lemmy.world 21 points 4 days ago

How is cobol toy wasn't it made for military?

[-] gwilikers@lemmy.ml 12 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

How is Lua further down along the Nu Lang axis than Go, Rust and Nim?

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] hperrin@lemmy.ca 9 points 4 days ago

I don’t get what toy lang means?

[-] Tamo240@programming.dev 2 points 3 days ago

For playing with, rather than 'serious' projects

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] radish 25 points 4 days ago

Curious how you decided what goes where, I'd hardly consider SQL a "Toy Lang" as opposed to a "System Lang"

load more comments (7 replies)
[-] Eiri@lemmy.ca 22 points 4 days ago

Did you just note Typescript, a superset of JavaScript that needs to be compiled into it, as closer to the system?

Also does it technically constitute a language? That feels like a stretch too.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] josefo@leminal.space 15 points 4 days ago

ngl I'm pretty mad right now

[-] scroll_responsibly@lemmy.sdf.org 15 points 4 days ago
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Endymion_Mallorn@kbin.melroy.org 20 points 4 days ago

COBOL is about as far from a "toy" as I can imagine. Almost everything corpo runs on it at some level.

[-] kkj@lemmy.dbzer0.com 14 points 4 days ago

And almost no one writes it for fun.

[-] lime@feddit.nu 10 points 4 days ago

i like how you've managed to include just a single non-procedural language, and it's the most interesting one by far, and you're calling it obsolete. says a lot.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 7 points 4 days ago

Was it a deliberate choice to leave JavaScript off entirely?

[-] alt_xa_23@lemmy.world 9 points 4 days ago

ECMAScript is included, which is the official JavaScript standard

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[-] Awkwardparticle@programming.dev 14 points 4 days ago

Why is it missing Haskell?

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] OmegaLemmy@discuss.online 5 points 4 days ago

Fortran is NOT obsolete you take that shit back

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 20 Aug 2025
250 points (100.0% liked)

Programmer Humor

25931 readers
1234 users here now

Welcome to Programmer Humor!

This is a place where you can post jokes, memes, humor, etc. related to programming!

For sharing awful code theres also Programming Horror.

Rules

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS