385
Gavin Newsom is Not a Progressive (www.currentaffairs.org)

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] ShoeThrower@lemmy.zip 12 points 2 months ago
[-] Azal@pawb.social 12 points 2 months ago

Ah, so it's not about the Gaza Strip now, it's Newsome is feckless.

I swear if Bernie Sanders was back we'd be getting posts like this on him, or Jesus himself.

I don't want to be conspiracy minded... but the sheer attempts at driving division when we have a literal fascist takeover and yet somehow the democrat is as bad if not worse is starting to smell.

[-] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 13 points 2 months ago

Ah, so it's not about the Gaza Strip now, it's Newsome is feckless.

You mean people can have more than one opinion at once?! How unthunkable!

[-] PhilipTheBucket@piefed.social 11 points 2 months ago

I've had multiple people on Lemmy tell me that Bernie Sanders is a Zionist, and they can't in good conscience support him.

And yes, it's fake. I mean, some of it might be stupidity or useful-idiot-ness. But some of it is absolutely just people deliberately trying to hurt the left, and it's succeeding very very well.

[-] marsza@lemmy.cafe 12 points 2 months ago
[-] return2ozma@lemmy.world 11 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Yes, it's still a good read. They also reposted it today and it's going viral on socials.

https://x.com/curaffairs/status/1957510456157040993

load more comments (12 replies)
[-] Fredthefishlord 11 points 2 months ago

Reddit just called me a Republican plant for not liking newsom. Before the primaries have even started. Pisses me off

load more comments (7 replies)
[-] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 10 points 2 months ago

Don't care. Way better than fascism and besides, the tweets are hilarious.

[-] Someonelol@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 2 months ago

If you want someone better then they need to elevate their profile by being as openly defiant and pissed at Trump like he is. I don't care if Newsom's acting insincere he's at least doing something to push back instead of writing another strongly worded letter. For the meanwhile stop letting perfect be the enemy of good.

[-] centipede_powder@lemmy.world 10 points 2 months ago

Wow, never good enough is it. This is why progressives fail to accomplish much.

[-] anarchiddy@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 2 months ago

Leadership will pick the least objectionable neolib to promote the shit out of, and they'll end up gambling - again - that voters care more about sticking it to Trump than achieving real relief from our capitalistic hellscape.

Newsom's only redeeming qualoty is his ability to get under Trump's skin. Literally everything else is focus-group tested neo-liberalism.

Early to be predicting anything but dems are fucked if Newsom is gonna be their guy.

[-] wowwoweowza@lemmy.world 9 points 2 months ago

Listen, I know we are the tiny bubble, so posting this here has no negative effect — but 2028 has to be about people on the right and left joining together to repudiate fascism and totalitarianism. Who cares about the past under these circumstances. I hope that Newsom’s lack of prog cred gives him cred with the pugs who hate Trump. Or are lukewarm on Trump.

[-] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 12 points 2 months ago

2028 has to be about people on the right and left joining together to repudiate fascism and totalitarianism

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[-] electric_nan@lemmy.ml 9 points 2 months ago

Damn this comment section reads like it's sponsored by the Newsom 2028 campaign.

[-] return2ozma@lemmy.world 8 points 2 months ago

History repeating.

[-] Diva@lemmy.ml 8 points 2 months ago

newsom could have just not done a photo op while clearing encampments.

between that and pandering to conservatives on trans rights I see no reason to trust the guy further than I can throw him

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›
this post was submitted on 19 Aug 2025
385 points (100.0% liked)

politics

26120 readers
2499 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS