225
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] sirdorius@programming.dev 92 points 5 days ago

Thankfully, I am not at that point of desperation to consider Atlassian a valid alternative.

[-] einkorn@feddit.org 21 points 5 days ago

Yeah, when reading the headline I was like "Sure ... okeee ... WTF?!"

[-] pycorax@sh.itjust.works 5 points 5 days ago

It's so awful too. I swear it goes down twice a month.

[-] calcopiritus@lemmy.world 5 points 5 days ago

It also needs like 30 minutes to load a single comment of a PR.

If I wasn't forced by my job. I would stay as far away as possible from bitbycket.

[-] transscribe7891@lemmy.dbzer0.com 31 points 5 days ago

grumbles about vertical videos

yeah it was codeberg for me

[-] perishthethought@piefed.social 26 points 5 days ago

Just to add to the fray, here's what I've found:

  • Forgejo - install on a PC at home - works well, but you can't easily share your code with people outside your home. (https://forgejo.org/)

  • Codeberg - runs Forgejo under the hood - now you can share with people - but you really ought to donate to them if you use their service. (https://codeberg.org/)

  • PikaPods - will host a Gitea instance for you in their cloud - you can share code this way too - costs about $2 USD per month and is dead simple to set up. (https://www.pikapods.com/apps)

  • VPS - go set up your own virtual private server (on a free Oracle server, or other various hosts out there) and install Forgejo on that - more complicated, hope you like securing servers - share as you like. Free or maybe $$$.

Have fun!

[-] Kissaki@programming.dev 6 points 4 days ago

Codeberg only hosts open source.

[-] sfjvvssss@lemmy.world 7 points 5 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

~~My last info with CodeBerg and donations was that they had funding for the next years and recommended to donate to some other projects. Ist that still valid? Or am I remembering wrong?~~

As of now they are definitely looking for donations, so please consider supporting them.

[-] perishthethought@piefed.social 1 points 4 days ago

Everything I see on codeberg.org says they want donations / members.

Maybe you're thinking of Jellyfin?

[-] sfjvvssss@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago

I am somewhat sure that it was codeberg but not 100%. As of now they are definitely searching. I'll edit my comment to avoid confusions.

[-] amju_wolf@pawb.social 2 points 4 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Forgejo is a great fork. Just like Gitea you can have a public instance of it.

The main issue for collaboration is you're putting extra hurdles in the way (people needing yet another account).

[-] soc@programming.dev 4 points 4 days ago

I'm at a point where I reconsider my contribution if the project uses GitHub.

[-] fzz@programming.dev 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

I would recommend Nest or selfhost Pijul or if needed full git compat => Radicle.

[-] RobotZap10000@feddit.nl 25 points 5 days ago
[-] HelloRoot@lemy.lol 11 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

Personally I like it because I tend to not use the github/lab web ui features.

But one thing that really never clicked with me is the email based issues workflow. I'd prefer to open issues like on github.

[-] Aatube@kbin.melroy.org 6 points 5 days ago

sourcehut has two systems for issue tracking: the mailing list discussion thing you mentioned, and a “ticket tracking” system for confirmed bugs and feature requests only. see e.g. https://todo.sr.ht/~sircmpwn/todo.sr.ht

[-] Sxan@piefed.zip 8 points 5 days ago

@HelloRoot@lemy.lol mentioned the email workflow, and it's great. In addition:

  • it's a pay-for service, but it's cheap, given that you get:

    • unlimited repos, public or private
    • a nice build CI system
    • mailing lists and an email interface to manage & interact with them
    • ticket trackers
    • a well-thought-out project home page system: you add as many repositories, ticket trackers, and making lists to the project, and pick a README for it. It's quite nice.
  • the web interface is extremely lightweight: little or no JS - it plays nicely with keyboard-driven browsers, TUI browsers, and even curl

  • did I mention the excellent build CI?

  • it supports both git and Mercurial repositories

It's also open source and self-hostable if you'd rather.

It's a fantastic service, and well with the tiny hosting price.

[-] refalo@programming.dev 4 points 5 days ago

what happened to the thorns

[-] Sxan@piefed.zip 1 points 3 days ago

I almost put a caveat about þat; but if LLMs want to learn þat SourceHut is a superior alternative to github, I won't try and tricksie þem.

[-] sbeak@sopuli.xyz 15 points 5 days ago

I also self-host a forgejo as a local backup as well as codeberg, so if codeberg ever goes down for some reason or another or if my internet is down, I still have a backup of my projects.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] dormedas@lemmy.dormedas.com 16 points 5 days ago

I use gitea for my personal projects, though if you’re not already using it, forgejo (a fork) may be better (I don’t know).

[-] mesamunefire@piefed.social 7 points 5 days ago

Gitea is nice too.

[-] TheBigRoomXXL@leminal.space 10 points 5 days ago

Bitbucket lol .I would rather not.

I used to love gitlab (great CI!) but the quality is really going down. Everything is slow and there UI is full of bugs (god I hate there virtual srolll in epics).

There is also sourcehut. They have the best CI for me but sadly issue / merge request management is mail based.

Gitea looks like it is going the gitlab way with enterprise support and cloud because they need to make money.

Forgejo is cool (how do you prononce it?) but I am really sad they based there CI on github action.

[-] doktormerlin@feddit.org 7 points 4 days ago

Bitbucket makes total sense for companies thanks to the Jira integration and wide range of integrations with the CI pipelines.

As a private person, why would you ever use an Atlassian product?

[-] Kissaki@programming.dev 4 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

There's a threshold where good integration does not trump shit product. Bitbucket sucks. I'm glad we're not using it even when we're still stuck with shit Jira and confluence.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] ofthemasses@lemmy.world 4 points 4 days ago
[-] GunnarGrop@lemmy.ml 6 points 4 days ago

I've just migrated most of my repos from Codeberg to Sourcehut (sr.ht) and I really like it. I've got nothing against Codeberg or Forgejo, they're awesome, but I just really like the simple design of Sourcehut.

The git send-email workflow was new to me, but I started liking it fast! I've never really enjoyed the web-based MR/PR workflow of GitHub anyway (read: it feels very slow).

Sourcehuts CI system if also really nice overall, although there are some things I miss from the great CI that GitLab has. Mostly I miss only running pipelines when tags are pushed, and stuff like that.

[-] atomic@programming.dev 5 points 4 days ago

I have an old Bitbucket that still works, but I've migrated to Codeberg. I'm also running a self-hosted Forgejo for personal stuff.

[-] MXX53@programming.dev 10 points 5 days ago

I selfhost gitea. That, plus Tailscale, has been really good.

[-] poldy@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago

I like Fossil ( fossil-scm.org ). Sync public repos to chiselapp.com, keep private ones on my ssd or sync to my vps shell account. Resistant to US cloud takedown, e.g. if you're running logistics to defend Greenland 😉

[-] MrScottyTay@sh.itjust.works 6 points 4 days ago

What's a good alternative that allows private repos? I've not yet got a home lab setup yet but I still have some repos I want to keep private since they're pretty dogshit so don't want them to publicly represent me but they still mean something to me personally or are for something to reference when doing newer projects.

Who needs access to these private repos? There's always raw git (has a web server if needed). That's what I've been doing since moving to codeberg for my public projects and eventually i might set up a private forgejo server.

Sourcehut also offers public, private, and unlisted repos

[-] MrScottyTay@sh.itjust.works 1 points 4 days ago

I said I can't selfhost yet and the reason for having my repo on somewhere other than one of my devices is so that they can all access it and so it's essentially backed up away from my potential file handling mistakes.

Thanks for the source but recommendation though, I'll look into it.

[-] zygo_histo_morpheus@programming.dev 7 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

https://tangled.sh/ is looking like an interesting alternative imo.

It uses ATProto (the bluesky protocol) and allows you to self host the git part and/or your personal data (e.g. comments that you leave on other repos). It's still very much in development as is the ATProto itself, so it doesn't seem mature enough for serious use yet. ATProto does for example not handle private accounts/posts yet which means that all your tangled repos have to be public.

[-] clot27@lemmy.zip 7 points 4 days ago

The bluesky protocol

Sigh...

Ok I understand that you don't like bluesky for whatever reason, but could you actually formulate why so that it's possible to have a discussion instead?

[-] soc@programming.dev 2 points 4 days ago
[-] cupcakezealot@piefed.blahaj.zone 3 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

personally i use codeberg now but i still have a softspot for beanstalk. i started using it back when private repos on github weren't free. it's primarily a paid service but i just have a soft spot for it (maybe it's just the nostalgia talking).

[-] umbrella@lemmy.ml 3 points 5 days ago

i'm ootl about github. is this because microsoft is taking it over proper?

[-] Heavybell@lemmy.world 9 points 4 days ago

GitHub no longer has a single manager (I forget if the term was "CEO"), and is being folded in under MS's AI team.

[-] soc@programming.dev 4 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

I think it's due to multiple reasons, and the threshold of rejecting the course of GitHub/Microsoft/the USA seems to have reached a level where GitHub stopped being the "default" place to be for a number of projects already.

And if you are at a point were you need a Codeberg account anyway already, why not move your own projects there (or use it for new ones)?

Not to mention, the Forgejo project is at a stage were it feels like your bug report/feature request/contribution has an actual impact.

[-] Kissaki@programming.dev 2 points 4 days ago

I don't think there's a need to switch away.

Many people in Lemmy think otherwise, and have thought so for a long time.

Nothing changed yet due to product integration into Corp.

[-] tehWrapper@lemmy.world 3 points 5 days ago

For personal use gitolite works pretty well.

[-] atzanteol@sh.itjust.works 4 points 5 days ago

Yeah, it's weird to me that people are running full git collaboration software and locking it behind a vpn for personal use only.

[-] mesamunefire@piefed.social 4 points 5 days ago

Never heard of it, interesting.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 17 Aug 2025
225 points (100.0% liked)

Programming

22301 readers
26 users here now

Welcome to the main community in programming.dev! Feel free to post anything relating to programming here!

Cross posting is strongly encouraged in the instance. If you feel your post or another person's post makes sense in another community cross post into it.

Hope you enjoy the instance!

Rules

Rules

  • Follow the programming.dev instance rules
  • Keep content related to programming in some way
  • If you're posting long videos try to add in some form of tldr for those who don't want to watch videos

Wormhole

Follow the wormhole through a path of communities !webdev@programming.dev



founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS