156

I feel like I have a deep reliance on society and technology, because I can't fucking see without glasses and I'm too scared to do Lasik lol (also expensive).

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 5 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

If people survive the "apocalypse" then glasses will survive too. You just likely won't be lucky enough to get lenses that are a perfect match for your prescription.

6 out of 7 houses on my street have at least one person with vision problems. Between the six of the houses we probably conservatively have 50 pairs of lenses if you count all the old pairs people tend to hang on to. My house has at least 10 just by itself.

[-] TimewornTraveler@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 7 hours ago

get an extra pair, throw it in the safe where you keep your beans and water

[-] bstix@feddit.dk 2 points 9 hours ago

I once lost my glasses and used an ordinary drinking glass as a monocle as substitute. It wasn't perfect, but good enough for me to find my glasses. (This was before cell phones had cameras).

Having been very near sighted for most of my life, I've come to the conclusion that it's not really that big of a handicap. It's mostly an issue for reading things, and even that can be done when putting it close enough.

I can't really think of anything in a hypothetical apocalypse where 20/20 vision would be absolutely necessary.

[-] scarabic@lemmy.world 17 points 16 hours ago

Our modern life involves a lot of reading and writing and sometimes very technical work. But the work of surviving on planet earth is a little less vision intensive: farming, cooking, childcare, handcrafts. Depending on how bad your vision is you might even be slow and shitty at these, but people can adapt to a lot and figure out how to perform tasks they’ve done before, even with poor vision. Look at the blind: they can be functional. Yes there are things like hunting which you could. not. do. with poor vision but that’s why we live in tribes. Someone younger with better eyes will do that while you shell nuts all day.

[-] rozodru@lemmy.world 1 points 8 hours ago

Yes there are things like hunting which you could. not. do. with poor vision

Matt Murdock took that personally.

[-] HugeNerd@lemmy.ca 5 points 16 hours ago

If there's that type of event, we (the survivors, that is. 95% of us will die) are going back, way back. When the elevator falls from the 21st century down to the 20th and 19th, the cable snaps and we're going back to the ground.

See, even a hundred years ago, items like a light bulb or electric motor already depended on a very large supply chain and many people working together that never meet in real life.

How do you make glass? Do you even know what glass is, how many types there are, how to make it different thicknesses or shapes? And even if you can, can you make more for everyone else?

What are you doing in the meantime that you don't have glass? How are you feeding yourself? With what?

Even if you think glass is "simple", how would you get the materials and tools? The people who used to do that, where are they? What knowledge have they lost? Where is that material today?

In other words, you're back to your bare hands and wits and whatever is in walking distance from you, right now.

Think you'll survive long enough to worry about glasses?

https://youtu.be/XetplHcM7aQ

[-] ur_ONLEY_freind@lemmy.zip 7 points 22 hours ago

I assumed surviving doctors would do for people what they did for sawyer in lost.

Use what you can find to get as close as you can per eye.

Other than that, sucks to suck, And I say that as somebody who is both near sighted and far sighted.

[-] Bebopalouie@lemmy.ca 10 points 1 day ago

One would think that if most of society is toast there will be a shitload of left over glasses that could be collected and then distributed to those in need.

[-] SnotFlickerman 63 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

https://www.engineeringforchange.org/solutions/product/adspecs/

Hopefully if enough of these get distributed it won't be so much of a problem except for people with astigmatism.

https://www.epo.org/en/news-events/european-inventor-award/meet-the-finalists/joshua-silver

Joshua Silver, a professor of physics at the University of Oxford, first had the idea to manufacture adjustable lenses for the poor, removing the need for expensive equipment and professionals, in May 1985 after he had created a variable focus lens out of curiosity.

His invention allows wearers to adjust the glasses to their personal prescription without the assistance of a healthcare professional. They simply look at a reading chart and adjust the glasses until they can see the letters clearly.

The glasses use durable but flexible plastic lenses, which have fluid sacs filled with silicone oil between them. These glasses can easily be adjusted by the wearer by simply adding or removing some of the oil in the sacs.

The invention is not without its limitations, however. Currently, the principle only functions successfully with circular lenses, limiting the design opportunities. Additionally, the principle can only alter the magnification of objects, so the glasses cannot treat those with astigmatism. What these spectacles lack in aesthetics, however, they make up for in spades with utility and work on non-round lenses is already underway.

His stated goal was to make the overall cost of a pair of glasses as low as $19.

[-] devdoggy@lemmy.world 2 points 16 hours ago

Well this is awesome but for me it wouldn't work. B/C I've got an astigmatism.

[-] SnotFlickerman 2 points 15 hours ago

Same, I have astigmatism and near-sightedness, a brutal combination.

[-] DeathByBigSad@sh.itjust.works 23 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Holy shit this is amazing. I love inventions like this. This just oddly gives me a lot of joy. No need to waste hours on stupid eye exams, just adjust it whenever my eyesight deteriorates.

Awesome! But this probably takes forever to actually become a product that one can buy.

[-] SnotFlickerman 9 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

https://www.theguardian.com/society/2008/dec/22/diy-adjustable-glasses-josh-silver

https://www.theguardian.com/global-development/2011/may/22/joshua-silver-glasses-self-adjusting

Original article I posted didn't give a date, but the earliest articles about these glasses are from 2008-2011, so they've certainly been around for almost 20 years now.

I think they were really aimed at rural communities in poor countries, several of the articles I've read reference about 300,000 pairs being distributed.

[-] Lag@lemmy.world 123 points 1 day ago

People who wear glasses are screwed but not as screwed as people who rely on medication.

[-] WoolyNelson@lemmy.world 61 points 1 day ago

I have trained my children from a young age that, in case of zombie outbreak or alien invasion, I am to be left behind. I require far too many medications to function in a post-apocalyptic setting.

[-] LadyButterfly@reddthat.com 8 points 1 day ago

I too am certain to die so my plan is to heroically sacrifice myself. Full on "I got this" while my friends are pulled away screaming "nooooooooooooooooooo!"

[-] WoolyNelson@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago

I wanted to train my kids to do this, but my spouse rolled their eyes and asked, "Why would we willingly give up a weapon for you to have a last stand?"

[-] LadyButterfly@reddthat.com 4 points 1 day ago

Yep! I plan to lead the zombies off while playing a banging tune on my phone.

[-] Stern@lemmy.world 19 points 1 day ago

What oddly specific training. Is there a training regimen for a "Evangelion everyone got turned into Tang" situation too? What about the "Just got spider powers and a Canon event may be coming"?

[-] WoolyNelson@lemmy.world 15 points 1 day ago

They were young and zombie movies were everywhere. In the way of all children, the questions were non-stop. This was also the time I was bedridden, so I convinced them that zombies only went after healthy people.

[-] magikmw@piefed.social 10 points 1 day ago

But I'll thrive with my untreated ADHD (unlikely)!

[-] Septimaeus@infosec.pub 12 points 1 day ago

I dunno, reading through common ADHD traits sometimes sounds like a description of the perfect post-apoc survivor lol

[-] Cethin@lemmy.zip 2 points 18 hours ago

Yeah, I'm pretty sure it's an adaptive trait, just one that isn't useful anymore. It wouldn't be good for everyone to have ever, but it probably was useful for some people to have. Just like most people are more awake during the day, you'd want some people awake at night to keep everyone safe, so we have "night owls" who are maladjusted to the typical work hours we have today.

[-] Sergio@piefed.social 8 points 1 day ago

I always imagined that ADHD was just our minds tuned to being hunter-gatherer survivors, and thus not suited for a sedentary office environment.

[-] Reyali@lemmy.world 19 points 1 day ago

My partner and I have discussed our wildly different willingness to try to survive in a post-apocalyptic world plenty of times over the years. He would work to survive and would probably thrive more than the average survivor. Me? I’ve always said I’ll likely head to the cough syrup section of the pharmacy.

This conversation came up earlier today, in fact. Well, I was recently diagnosed with rheumatoid arthritis. I’m still sorting out the right medication to get it under control and am dealing with a lot of pain, but way less than before starting treatment. I told him with this diagnosis, if society ever collapses in a way that causes me to be unable to get my medication? I’m out.

[-] salacious_coaster@infosec.pub 10 points 1 day ago

I'm on the same page. I've spent most of my adult life testing the limits of my skills, wit, and badassery. My conclusion from that is that I am not a badass and have no interest in trying to survive societal collapse.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Retro_unlimited@lemmy.world 15 points 1 day ago

I know of a YouTuber called the blind homesteader. He has family and friends help him. They have quite the homestead and he often helps the community around his homestead too.

[-] usernamesAreTricky@lemmy.ml 34 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Not that useful in scenarios besides reading: if you curl your hands in front of your eye and leave a very tiny opening you can create a pinhole that'll make a tiny bit of your view in focus

Photo from Minute Physics demonstrating what you need to do for that:

https://youtu.be/OydqR_7_DjI

[-] Rhynoplaz@lemmy.world 18 points 1 day ago

Been using this trick to read my alarm clock since I was ten!

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Rhynoplaz@lemmy.world 22 points 1 day ago

We could rely on scavenging what's already been made. Even if it isn't your exact prescription, a little might be better then nothing.

[-] TwoBeeSan@lemmy.world 1 points 23 hours ago

We're fucked. Our genes told us.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 17 Aug 2025
156 points (100.0% liked)

No Stupid Questions

42946 readers
479 users here now

No such thing. Ask away!

!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.

All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.



Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.

If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.



Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.

If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here. This includes using AI responses and summaries.



Credits

Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!

The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS