Yeah? The comments are based on published, publicly available claims made by others that she has not sued the original author over. Plus, disclosure could be fun. Go for it.
another insane day in America
At this point, it's just a normal day.
Ooooh, discovery is going to be fun. An illegal alien sex worker who becomes first lady having mile high adulterous sex is going to make great, and interesting news.
Supreme Court ain’t gonna care
I await the discovery phase of the inevitable lawsuit.
in legalese, that's the "find out" from the latin "Fuck around and find out"
Futuis circ et invenies de
Vagabundus, invenies.
What the fuck is this “on notice” bullshit?
He got a cease and desist, or lawsuit threat.
Am I just getting old and I can’t understand the news anymore?
We need to use dramatic, divisive language that no one really uses in real life to draw in more clicks/views for our six trillion ad partners.
Hunter be like...
When is ICE hauling her off to the gulag?
Didn’t realize she was still around.
She's not around Donny's chode anymore, that's for sure
WTF is bpdaily.com?
Are there any Lemmy instances that have higher standards for news sources?
i think it is to some extent up to us to regulate this, which is good and bad. I would also be interested in other news instances, but it seems like all of them have some amount of garbage linked sources. I just try to call it out in the comments so other people will double check on the validity of the headline as well. Community moderation may be better than a single moderator with the power of 'censoring' the whole instance. Also, by writing really long paragraphs like this maybe we can draw peoples eyes to the fact that our up/down votes also regulate what links/sources get traction and that catchy headlines may not be enough to warrant a vote up.
News
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.
Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.
7. No duplicate posts.
If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners.
The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.