7
submitted 10 hours ago by Deceptichum@quokk.au to c/world@quokk.au

cross-posted from: https://aussie.zone/post/23613321

Australia has agreed to take sole responsibility for the management, security and storage of all nuclear waste from its fleet of proposed nuclear-powered submarines, including the spent fuel from the submarines’ reactors – high-level nuclear waste that will be radioactive for millennia once the submarines are decommissioned from the early 2050s.

The spent fuel is also a nonproliferation risk: Australia’s nuclear submarines will run on highly enriched uranium which can be reprocessed to make nuclear weapons.

top 2 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] scintilla@crust.piefed.social 1 points 6 hours ago

Seems like specifics should be worked out more in advance but getting your own nuclear subs as a country is an absolute game changer strategically.

Probably should have stuck with france but it's a bit late now lol.

[-] Deceptichum@quokk.au 1 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

It also makes us less independent and reliant on the UK and the US, both countries that are heading in a terrible direction. Likewise the strategic gain isn't that much, considering our only enemies would be America's enemies. If we must have nuclear subs, we should also build the capability to construct, maintain, and refuel them.

France's fault imo, they fucked around and changed the deal trying to move more manufacturing to France. If they hadn't tried to take advantage of us, we wouldn't have walked away.

this post was submitted on 13 Aug 2025
7 points (100.0% liked)

World News

500 readers
250 users here now

Please help and contribute as we vote on rules:
https://quokk.au/post/21590

Other Great Communities:

Rules

Be excellent to each other

founded 10 months ago
MODERATORS