510

It is time to move to darknets like: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Veilid

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] biotin7@sopuli.xyz 8 points 4 hours ago

Complacency has led us to this dystopia. Start Pirating & torrenting. Support Alternative platforms Fund dark-web tech

[-] Baked86@lemmy.world 8 points 5 hours ago

Is there any way to fight chat control in the EU?

[-] Romulon@sh.itjust.works 3 points 4 hours ago

If you go to chatcontrol.eu you will find more info about chat control and how to fight against it.

[-] nialv7@lemmy.world 13 points 8 hours ago

Guess China was just ahead of the curve.

[-] Teknikal@eviltoast.org 23 points 17 hours ago

Just read some story about a Digital ID being proposed called the Britcard which everyone has to carry all the time sounds very Black Mirror and concerning.

[-] sunbeam60@lemmy.ml 12 points 6 hours ago

FWIW, Denmark has had this digital infrastructure in the last 10 years and it’s been the foundation of a huge transformation in terms of how people interact with the government services.

It’s also extremely privacy preserving and while Denmark is actually moving forward with an age proving infrastructure like Britain, it’s designed with zero knowledge proofs so literally no-one knows where you have proved your age.

I don’t have a problem with the infrastructure. I have a problem with how Britain designs and uses the infrastructure.

[-] SpaceCadet@sopuli.xyz 7 points 4 hours ago

FWIW, Denmark has had this digital infrastructure in the last 10 years and it’s been the foundation of a huge transformation in terms of how people interact with the government services.

I don't think anyone has a problem with an ID you need to interact with government services. They know your identity anyway, and for obvious security reasons it's necessary that they properly verify that you are who you claim you are.

What people have a problem with, is needing to provide an ID to simply access whole categories of content across the wide internet that are not related to your identity in any way.

[-] Ronno@feddit.nl 6 points 7 hours ago

A digital ID, by itself, isn't much of an issue and can be very convenient for the user as well. Even better, it can be setup in a more privacy conserving way. For instance, when you have to provide your ID today, you often have to give companies a copy of your ID, which isn't really favorable to the owner of that ID. With digital ID, it's easier to give/revoke access to your ID or mask certain information the other party doesn't need to know. Most ID scans are mainly done to verify the person has a legitimate ID anyways and presented it, making this digital can be an improvement.

Where it does get black mirror-ey is when you have to use that digital identity to basically log in to the internet and all your internet activity is logged to your ID. The shit the government can pull with such information is mindbogglingly bad.

[-] mysticmartz@lemmy.world 48 points 1 day ago

We need to build a decentralised internet quickly using I2P or something similar and scale and decentralise quickly. VPN’s will be the first to go then TOR after they attempt to control the exit nodes .

We need to show the governments that we are allowed to use encryption and Wikipedia and not be treated as criminals for wanting privacy .

[-] sexy_peach@feddit.org 1 points 5 hours ago

I've been running i2p for years. It works well and if there was demand it would be fairly trivial to make Lemmy compatible.

So what did you change about your behavior after writing this message?

[-] vacuumflower@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 9 hours ago

Something similar when using an operating system from Google and Apple, known for their attachment to privacy and noble behavior?

In any case, you can't have a mesh with ends reachable at all times or even addressed. Delay-tolerant applications are sort of better. With nodes synchronizing when in contact. Except for, say, threaded discussions to make sense, this would almost require some sort of dependency management, to synchronize objects by priority.

But honestly all of today's computing seems authoritarian and imperial. Which leads to the way it shapes the world. Richard Stallman is known for being worried about this (not many other people), but GNU + Hurd is honestly still in the same paradigm.

I wonder if it's possible to devise something like BTRON, except with program objects being similar to Java assemblies, but at the same time more like Common Lisp. For the commonly used software to be generally easily hackable\changeable. BTRON in its concept is nicer than Unix, it's a consistent idea for modernity of computing, one can say. It seems even nicer than Plan 9. Unfortunately I don't know Japanese to play with it.

Something that could be used on weak and cheap enough hardware to have some separate niche of personal\PDA computing based on it. Like Briar, but.

Things like CJDNS and Yggdrasil surely look nice, but those just change one layer. For a real totalitarian world they won't help. It's not even a matter of technology, it's a matter of links' capability when you can't use the Internet because, ahem, you'll be detected and police will come knocking.

[-] mysticmartz@lemmy.world 1 points 8 hours ago

Perhaps a meshtastic delivered list of tor bridges or a wireless p2p internet . Digital dead drops

[-] vacuumflower@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 7 hours ago

Well, in my head "like Briar" is the best thing possible for architecture. Except Briar only synchronizes joined groups.

Perhaps even with some kind of, yes, a digital dead drop, that would synchronize (purging stuff old or not in demand) everything announced by devices passing nearby. Over some low-range radio, like BT.

Asynchronous communication. Because having a real-time connection with any mesh is hard.

[-] shneancy@lemmy.world 54 points 1 day ago

the brits really need to learn from the french how to protest. it's been nearly a month and i haven't heard of even a measly car being set on fire, just one petition that got a reply akin to "lol, nah". the french would've set a car on fire for less is all i'm saying

[-] SpaceCadet@sopuli.xyz 2 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

the brits really need to learn from the french how to protest

Where were all the protests to this: https://techinformed.com/france-enforces-age-verification-law-adult-sites/ ?

This is what you get at the moment when you access pornhub from a French IP:

[-] echodot@feddit.uk 13 points 1 day ago

There has been a petition. And it has received the aforementioned "lol no" response. The thing is though after the French set the capital on fire the age of retirement still went up, nothing changed.

Anyway, all we have to do is use a VPN to get around it and wait for the inevitable data leak, then the whole thing will collapse under the weight of its own stupidity.

[-] muusemuuse@sh.itjust.works 5 points 15 hours ago

It’s cute you think VPNs will survive this.

[-] echodot@feddit.uk 3 points 10 hours ago

This is all theatre. They know they have no legitimate reason to ban VPNs. Their justification for all of this is protect the children if they start banning VPNs they're going to start getting asked some incredibly awkward questions about how that's going to work.

[-] sexy_peach@feddit.org 1 points 5 hours ago

Yup they just want more control, they know they can't have total control. So why ban VPNs, only a fraction of people uses them.

[-] echodot@feddit.uk 1 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

Most of the people who use VPNs use them for work as well. It would be an impossible task to craft a law in such a way that didn't ban VPNs for business use, but did for private use, other than to just come out and say that.

[-] WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works 4 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago)

and that this thing will collapse

[-] then_three_more@lemmy.world 33 points 1 day ago

With regards to this most people are just ignoring the law. VPN use has gone through the roof.

[-] shneancy@lemmy.world 15 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

yeah and their government is planning on restricting VPN use because of that, they're not going to stop being dickheads, brits need to get their voices heard sooner rather than later

[-] then_three_more@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago

They've said nothing of the sort.

[-] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 5 points 1 day ago

One backbench MP said something about it.

[-] then_three_more@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

Ah ok. That makes sense where it came from then.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] RageAgainstTheRich@lemmy.world 87 points 2 days ago

I cant even think of any legit reason to do this. To protect children? The government does not care about children. Its why so many suffer in poverty. Watching tits online is the least of their problems.

The only reasons i can think of is control. Forcing people to give up more information about themselves. Because knowledge is power.

[-] WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world 48 points 1 day ago

The reason is that we all live in capitalist dictatorships masquerading as "democracy", and are rapidly approaching a time when climate change, wealth inequality, and automation will see widespread revolt of the proles, so the ruling class is tightening its grip, and going all in on fascism.

[-] themurphy@lemmy.ml 25 points 1 day ago

Scotland might finally leave the UK because of this. It has been close before, but this must do it by now.

[-] sexy_peach@feddit.org 1 points 5 hours ago

I doubt enough people care

[-] echodot@feddit.uk 8 points 1 day ago

England isn't the problem, it's London that's the problem.

London needs to become its own independent city state and then they can do what the hell they want with it and then we'll be governed by someone from Leeds or Manchester or someplace like that, by someone who actually has a grip

[-] themurphy@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Didnt say England was the problem. The UK is, whereever it's run from.

[-] blinfabian@feddit.nl 11 points 1 day ago

and stay out of the EU, england

[-] nialv7@lemmy.world 2 points 8 hours ago
[-] blinfabian@feddit.nl 1 points 5 hours ago

okay, remove your home from the EU specifically then (reference to Peter Griffins microstate)

[-] manualoverride@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago

We don’t want this dystopian nightmare either, and just like Brexit we weren’t told what it was before it was too late. Hopefully you will welcome us back when all the liars are voted out and ignored.

[-] sexy_peach@feddit.org 2 points 5 hours ago

Europe will always welcome you, since for us it's obvious you belong here.

But it's not going to happen since Brits think they're part of the "international" world. And I guess with many thinking this they're not entirely wrong.

[-] manualoverride@lemmy.world 2 points 4 hours ago

I think you may be generalising based on what our politicians say and comments on social media that are written by Russian bot farms or not mass reported by them.

All poles confirm the UK public know they were lied to and would never make the same mistake again.

[-] sexy_peach@feddit.org 2 points 4 hours ago

I don't disagree but you're not going to find a majority that wants to reapply

[-] manualoverride@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago
[-] sexy_peach@feddit.org 2 points 3 hours ago

Okay I wish it would happen, but this doesn't talk what specific terms etc. I still doubt it will happen

[-] Tryenjer@lemmy.world 3 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago)

It seems that this time the EU plans to follow the UK in these atrocious policies against the Human Right to privacy, unfortunately. What a hell of a can of worms your country has opened.

[-] manualoverride@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago
  • This can of worms Carnegie UK and the lobbyists have opened.
this post was submitted on 12 Aug 2025
510 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

73967 readers
3097 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS