43
all 21 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 6 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago)

Yes. Why not? They're small enough.

Ports and the like do have radiation sensors to try and combat any such thing. I don't know how effective or widespread they are exactly, though, and you'd think if you have a nuke just crossing in somewhere else wouldn't be hard.

[-] Skyrmir@lemmy.world 1 points 8 hours ago

Yes, but at this point it would be cheaper and quicker to have spacex fly to orbit, capture a 5 ton rock and drop it on a city.

There's a reason Iran has been 'weeks' from making a bomb for decades now.

[-] remon@ani.social 2 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

That would be a really shitty nuke. Like around 10% of a Davy Crockett.

[-] JASN_DE@feddit.org 33 points 21 hours ago

Considering that you only need the warhead: absolutely.

[-] Boddhisatva@lemmy.world 29 points 21 hours ago

Easily. That is one reason why ports and other national entry points have systems in place to detect that. Of course there is nothing to stop a bad actor from reaching the border or coast with a weapon and setting it off.

[-] neidu3@sh.itjust.works 8 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago)

Yup, as a foreign national, I had to jump through a myriad of hoops to get a TWIC which enables me to enter and exit US ports freely without someone escorting me around. Fun fact: A TWIC allows even foreigners to register as a known traveler and TSA pre-screening, allowing me to skip a lot of the hassle when flying in the US.

Hell, getting a TWIC was the only reason why I bothered with getting an actual US work visa. I now hold B1, B2, C1/D, and it was all for the TWIC. If it wasn't for that, I'd be fine just going on a tourist visa.

[-] Ziggurat@jlai.lu 4 points 19 hours ago

I am curious now on how much of it is about being worried about nuclear bomb, and how much is about people either knowingly importing illegally radioactive materials or worker forgetting that the big orange box is actually radioactive materials (believe me, it's way more common than it seems, especially with low activity parts)

[-] Boddhisatva@lemmy.world 4 points 16 hours ago

A little from column A, and a little from column B, I would imagine.

[-] yesman@lemmy.world 18 points 21 hours ago
[-] bluGill@fedia.io 7 points 18 hours ago

That was Einstein's probosal to fdr in 1938. nobody was interested. When the English checked the numbers they realized it was airplane size and encouraged the us to build on. Airplane bomb bays are small, a row boat could haul little boy around ( though it is likely to capsize if the seas are not perfect calm)

[-] HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club 7 points 19 hours ago

Given that they got it down to a bazooka, yeah.

[-] AlexisFR@jlai.lu 3 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago)

No. If it was that easy, a significant City would've been nuked by terrorists by then.

[-] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 4 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago)

I mean, getting a bomb in the first place is hard as hell. Al Qaeda literally just got scammed until they gave up. It's a major project for largish states, even.

[-] Gustephan@lemmy.world 4 points 18 hours ago
[-] SpikesOtherDog@ani.social 5 points 21 hours ago

This is something that USA has discussed and there may be radiation sensors installed in and around major cities to prevent this.

[-] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 1 points 8 hours ago

i assume for a truck you can shield the radiation with lead walls, or insulating materials.

[-] SpikesOtherDog@ani.social 1 points 2 hours ago

I figure it is possible. I don't know how much lead shielding is required, and a semi could probably haul it just fine.

That being said, one will most likely still give themselves away. Contamination is a thing, and I don't know how one would build and load that massive weight in secret.

[-] groolthedemon@lemmy.world 4 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago)

On May 25, 1953 the Grable test under Operation Upshot Knothole fired the W9 nuclear artillery shell over 6 miles downrange at Frenchman's Flat detonating at 15 kilotons. The artillery shell weighed roughly 803 lbs. This was 1950's technology that could still fit in the back of a pickup truck and level a city. I'm sure they're a lot lighter and a lot more powerful today. So, yes. If we could do it in '53 we could definitely do it today, but with orders of magnitude more destructive force and likely lighter weight.

Edit: I did some more digging. For instance, the W88 warhead aboard MIRV's on nuclear subs today have an explosive force of 475 kilotons with a mean average weight of 400 lbs for comparison. Though, most of that weight is probably shielding for reentry, so you could probably cut it back significantly if you're just putting it in a car trunk.

[-] HurlingDurling@lemmy.world 4 points 21 hours ago

Delivered? Unlikely.

Detonated? Absolutely.

[-] thisbenzingring@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 20 hours ago

Fat Man and Little Boy would fit in a small Uhaul... but both could fit in a big one together.

The test nukes were the size of one of those county fair huge pumpkins

this post was submitted on 11 Aug 2025
43 points (100.0% liked)

Ask Lemmy

33916 readers
1066 users here now

A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions


Rules: (interactive)


1) Be nice and; have funDoxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, and toxicity are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them


2) All posts must end with a '?'This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?


3) No spamPlease do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.


4) NSFW is okay, within reasonJust remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either !asklemmyafterdark@lemmy.world or !asklemmynsfw@lemmynsfw.com. NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].


5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions. If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email info@lemmy.world. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.


6) No US Politics.
Please don't post about current US Politics. If you need to do this, try !politicaldiscussion@lemmy.world or !askusa@discuss.online


Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.

Partnered Communities:

Tech Support

No Stupid Questions

You Should Know

Reddit

Jokes

Ask Ouija


Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS