388
submitted 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) by alphacyberranger@lemmy.world to c/games@lemmy.world
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] kaitco@lemmy.world 169 points 2 years ago

The fact that these decisions are coming down from the ex-CEO of EA Games, who was the CEO when EA was voted “Worst Company in the World”, just makes all this even more entertaining to watch.

GamePass and probably most cheap sales are all going up in flames because Unity has hired a demon to lead them into oblivion.

[-] reflex@kbin.social 64 points 2 years ago

The fact that these decisions are coming down from the ex-CEO of EA Games . . . .

This guy speedrunning the enshittification game. Oceangate needs to build another sub, stat.

[-] ArugulaZ@kbin.social 40 points 2 years ago

Microsoft learned never to leave an EA exec at the wheel ten years earlier, with the disastrous launch of the Xbox One. You know, the all seeing, all knowing, all credit card charging privacy invader with its hooks permanently sunk into the internet, and a camera you couldn't cover, like it was some motherfucking episode of Max Headroom. Allow me to say, "Fuck you, Don Mattrick, and the DRM and surveillance-laden horse you rode in on."

[-] radix@lemmy.world 96 points 2 years ago

Right. Here's how it works: Your game is on Gamepass, and a user installs it. Now instead of Microsoft paying you $0.15, then you paying Unity $0.10, Microsoft will just pay us directly the $0.10, and you still get your $0.05! See, it's a great deal! Everybody gets their money and you don't even have to deal with the Unity costs! Please, don't go!!

[-] hahattpro@lemmy.world 12 points 2 years ago

Good business model. I hope Gamepass wil also limit number of game user can install, like, pick only 4 in 100 or so

[-] Lolman228@kbin.social 85 points 2 years ago

Nintendo is gonna lawyer up at the speed of God before they'd pay unity a fucking cent.

[-] flop_leash_973@lemmy.world 84 points 2 years ago

And Mexico was going to pay for that southern boarder wall...

[-] scala@lemmy.ml 82 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Will they tho?

It’s unclear if Sony, Microsoft, and Nintendo are aware of this particular change in policy, and whether they’d be willing to comply with Unity Technologies.

[-] MossyFeathers@pawb.social 39 points 2 years ago

If they aren't already paying royalties to Unity on behalf of the devs, then I can almost guarantee they won't be paying royalties in the future. If they are doing that, then the devs might want to double check their revenue, because that may mean that Unity's been double-dipping on royalties (taking royalties from distribution through Sony, MS and Nintendo, and then taking them again directly from the devs).

[-] stopthatgirl7@kbin.social 17 points 2 years ago

It’s like when CDPR said everyone could get refunds for CP2077 without talking to the stores first, then were shocked when Sony removed it from the PlayStation Store.

[-] loobkoob@kbin.social 12 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Yep, although at least that was a pro-consumer move on CDPR's part. It's very understandable why Sony wasn't happy about it, but it wasn't a shady move on CDPR's part. Whereas the same definitely can't be said for Unity right now.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] LiveLM@lemmy.zip 78 points 2 years ago

Nintendo? Like fuck they will

[-] Chariotwheel@kbin.social 45 points 2 years ago

Nintendo, Sony and Microsoft Lawyers united... that's an enemy you don't want to fight. Each department alone is scary enough. All three of them? Now, that's something you want to be on very solid ground for.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Th4tGuyII@kbin.social 59 points 2 years ago

Yeah, because Microsoft, Sony, and Nintendo are companies who would never pass those costs back to the devs or down onto consumers. They'd totally bite the bullet on Unity's new royalty...

Unity are out of their minds if they think this is at all a good move. All they're going to do by pushing devs away and pissing off the major distributors is inspire the creation/adoption of a competitor.

[-] kautau@lemmy.world 36 points 2 years ago

That’s what happens when your CEO is an ex EA exec who thought that charging battlefield players a dollar to reload their gun was a good idea

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] stopthatgirl7@kbin.social 51 points 2 years ago

You can just see the panic coming out of Unity.

They thought they’d be able to slip this change through and people would just pay it. They were expecting a big payday, not a storm of bad press and angry people.

[-] Uranium3006@kbin.social 10 points 2 years ago

Also now Deva are gonna be skeptical of proprietary game engines. It's too big of a risk to develop on anything proprietary now that this is on the table as a thing that could happen. Change won't ahppen overnight but expect FOSS game engines to start getting big

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] DontTreadOnBigfoot@lemmy.world 46 points 2 years ago

PlayStation, Nintendo and Xbox claim "no the fuck we won't..."

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] bouh@lemmy.world 44 points 2 years ago

I wonder if it's purposeful sabotage at this point. You can't be that stupid and still be paid millions of dollars to do your job can you?

Capitalism is truly amazing if it can happen.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] VelociCatTurd@lemmy.world 42 points 2 years ago

By the definition of “distributor” this would include Steam, GOG, Epic, etc. as well.

[-] colonial@lemmy.world 33 points 2 years ago

In before one of them starts stripping or firewalling the phone-home code. What's Unity gonna do? Valve hasn't signed any contracts with them!

[-] TotesIllegit@lemmy.world 11 points 2 years ago

This sounds like it would mean charging Valve money for the privilege of using Valve's own infrastructure every time a player installed a Unity game after a major PC upgrade/reinstall or after uninstalling that MMO they dumped every other game in their library try out.

Steam could probably bake a ban on software that uses installation trackers into their developer/publisher ToS, or ban the collection or transmission of Steam user data related to installations, or something similar.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] 4am@lemm.ee 13 points 2 years ago

Apple has Unity games in Apple Arcade I’m sure; which is like “iCloud GamePass”. So add another behemoth with almost more lawyers than money.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] ArugulaZ@kbin.social 41 points 2 years ago

No they won't! There's no way any of the big console manufacturers will ever agree to those terms, ESPECIALLY Nintendo. Microsoft would just buy Unity out before paying that ransom. You be smokin' some bigtime crack, Riccitello.

[-] lester@lemmy.world 18 points 2 years ago

Microsoft would just buy Unity out before paying that ransom

Maybe that's the plan lol

[-] maynarkh@feddit.nl 12 points 2 years ago

TBH that would explain the decision. Pump up the projected revenue numbers right before an acquisition and exit.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 38 points 2 years ago

Because picking a fight with some of the world's biggest companies is the best form of damage control...

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Sabata11792@kbin.social 38 points 2 years ago

Fastest way to have all traces of your engine scrubbed from realty.

[-] echodot@feddit.uk 34 points 2 years ago

Oh, so is this the result of some negotiation with them, or are they just saying random shit again?

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] CodexArcanum@lemmy.world 33 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Listen peasants, if you don't like the freeholder fees we charge, then surely Lord Microsoft will shelter you on his lands as a serf, and pay your fees on your behalf.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Savaran@lemmy.world 32 points 2 years ago

I wonder how they’d enforce that exactly since none of those companies are likely to have a contract with Unity that says they’d pay anything like that. Their distribution contracts are with the studios… and the studios, if they keep their subscriptions would be the ones contracted with Unity. Good luck telling MS or Sony that your little indie company bound them into a contract with your engine vendor.

[-] amenotef@lemmy.world 31 points 2 years ago

Actually...consumers end up paying for it. Companies will just increase prices as when the Government taxes them.

[-] NOFF@lemmy.world 34 points 2 years ago

Companies will just increase prices whenever they can get away with it

Fixed that for ya.

[-] amenotef@lemmy.world 13 points 2 years ago

Also valid. Yeah

[-] lorez@lemm.ee 28 points 2 years ago

Weirdly they don't mention Steam...

[-] dustyData@lemmy.world 11 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Steam is just a storefront, not a publisher. And traditionally Valve only publishes their own games. While Nintendo, Microsoft and Sony are more broad game publishers. Imagine Casio trying to charge the watch store for every time you look at the time in the watch you bought there. Complete bonkers.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Tronn4@lemmy.world 27 points 2 years ago

Somehow this cost will be pushed to us gamers

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] capt_wolf@lemmy.world 25 points 2 years ago

Meanwhile, Nintendo, Microsoft, and Sony:

[-] Madiator2011@lm.madiator.cloud 22 points 2 years ago

So this is why we go ps plus and xbox game pass prices go up :D xd

[-] Toribor@corndog.social 32 points 2 years ago

People keep telling me that PC gaming is expensive and yet I pay no subscription fees and have plenty of choice for which storefront to purchase from so game prices tend to stay low outside a few exceptions.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] Thrickles@lemm.ee 22 points 2 years ago

Waiting to see if Unity games will get yanked from those platforms.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] x4740N@lemmy.world 17 points 2 years ago

That cost will be passed on to the studios

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] CaptObvious@literature.cafe 17 points 2 years ago

Mares eat oats and does eat oats.

Ya gotta love when a corp realizes they’ve stepped in it and starts trying to create an escape route. I’m more than a little surprised that Unity’s board of directors haven’t taken the CEO’s head on a platter yet.

[-] echo64@lemmy.world 16 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

No, they won't. Unity has an agreement with the devs not the platform holders

all that will happen is that unity games won't appear on subscription services

[-] qyron@sopuli.xyz 14 points 2 years ago

Aren't there enough FOSS gamw engines out in the wild to keep indie authors and small companies working without concern for this kind of crap?

Contributing with a cash amount to have work done on any engine would be cheaper and more useful for all parts involved than having to deal with these vampires.

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] Stowaway@midwest.social 12 points 2 years ago

So what your saying is games and consoles could have been cheaper this whole time?

[-] Hiccup@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 2 years ago

Unity is delusional. They're behaving like a despot. Down with unity!

[-] HawlSera@lemm.ee 10 points 2 years ago

Sony, Microsoft, and Nintendo will see you in court Unity.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 15 Sep 2023
388 points (100.0% liked)

Games

38145 readers
668 users here now

Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.

Weekly Threads:

What Are You Playing?

The Weekly Discussion Topic

Rules:

  1. Submissions have to be related to games

  2. No bigotry or harassment, be civil

  3. No excessive self-promotion

  4. Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts

  5. Mark Spoilers and NSFW

  6. No linking to piracy

More information about the community rules can be found here and here.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS