If he was gonna do it he would have already. This is BS drama trump is stirring up on an international scale to try and get us to stop talking about the Epstein files. RELEASE THE DAMN FILES.
The 1000 FBI agents are still redacting trumps name from the files, they need more time.
"HOW THE FUCK DID HE END UP IN THAT MANY PLACES!?!?"
I believe it was by airplane.
I'm sure epstein kept saying how innocent trump was, that's why he's there so often.
You know what would be an even better distraction? Actually invading Mexico. You're brushing off this threat and not taking it seriously just like the first election as if he can't possibly be serious and no serious person would go along with it anyway. You can't just sloganeer your way out of this. Hitler is telling us he wants to own the rest of Europe and murder all the Jews. The first of the concentration camps are already complete. He has already begun rounding up undesirables en masse, with effective legal impunity. What the fuck makes you so fucking certain he doesn't want to invade France too?! Wake the fuck up.
The first of the concentration camps are already complete.
The first of the domestic ones. There's still plenty of blacksites all over the world, most notably Salvador, lately.
I seriously can't fathom how anybody can still say "He's probably bluffing again. It's just a joke."
Trump doesn't want to seize Mexico like wants to take Canada because Mexico is full of brown people.
Wait, you think white people don't want to take over the country full of brown people? How do you think Colonialism works?
And if you need a modern day equivalent, then just look at Gaza
okay but hear me out
israel doesn’t want to seize gaza because it’s full of brown people
and suddenly everything gets so much worse
mexican cartels are to the US as hamas is to israel - or at least that’s the narrative they’re pushing
The cartels are just becuase Trump doesn't like them
ugh.
The Cartels are pure evil, they aren't 'resistance' they're thugs who murder whole families 3 generations down for not paying them bribes.
The Trump cartel?
Canada is full of brown people too.
Oh I'm sure Trump plans to 'fix' that
Yeah. Usually one would worry about fascists invading countries with an ethnicity they don't like for Lebensraum, but "fortunately" America has plenty of minorities on its own soil so the Holocaust can be implemented completely domestically.
Fuck the us army, I hope they lose this war too.
loosing wars is their thing.
the US military is there to funnel tax dollars to shareholders so they can funnel a minute fraction of those dollars to lobbying bribes.
winning wars isn't profitable. long open ended occupations are far more profitable.
You should lead the charge clown. Who is creating the demand for the illegal drug market? There's your root cause.
open ended occupations are far more profitable.
Ah, one of our major exports: "Occupation as a Service."
One does not invite a Fascist into one's country without losing that country
So if the cartels are operating in Mexico and the United States, and Trump's executive order doesn't involve using the military on Mexican territory, I guess it must be to use the military on American territory?
Yeah—now military deployments anywhere in America can be excused as part of anti-cartel actions, until they aren’t.
And don't forget all the bullshit claims that people with random tattoos were MS-13 members and sent to El Salvador. Now he'll send the army against whatever tattoo he decides he doesn't like next.
The cartels are an evil scourge without a trace of humanity. Nothing of value will be lost if they're swept off the board. I hope their buttholes are puckering at the thought of Delta and SEAL teams kicking down their doors.
The most effective way to dismantle criminal organizations of any nature is not by guns and bullets but by eliminating their markets.
People resort to drugs out of despair and disinformation. They either want an escape of reality or they want to "have fun" and they disregard or ignore the trap drugs represent.
Give to people security and a good life, inform and educate them, create safety nets for them to crash when things go wrong and 90% of drug trafficking and related crime just disappears. The other 10% you keep at bay by having good, humane, well trained police, on which the population can trust and rely.
Going for an all out war on cartels is a nighmare waiting to happen, at your door.
Way to go. I like this take.
It's become very clear that there is no moral goal behind the "war on drugs." It just becomes a never-ending escalation of cat and mouse, and civilians are caught up in the middle.
The factions of fear and despair based profit that made everybody miserable enough to give the cartels a market, now are simply mad they're not getting (enough) revenue from that market.
Conveniently as well, entire industries (many well-meaning) have sprung up around combatting the ravages of addiction, and "because drugs" is a convenient cop-out for pretty much every societal issue, and an expedient paper-thin justification for crackdowns, fear-mongering, and draconian punishments.
Unlike the rest of us, the powers that be have little to gain from "solving" drugs.
Instead of reducing the systemic precursors to crime, they would rather instead cut off everybody's arms and merely rent them back to you only while you're clocked in at work.
Sometimes people just take drugs because drugs are fun ... Not all of them are despairing or desperate...
The gross majority I am fairly confident they are.
But if you think recreational drugs are fine, campaign for them to be legalized, just like tobbacco, alcohol and guns. And pot. Those have been legalized. Less trouble when something is properly regulated.
Where I live, they haven't all been. I suspect many feel about guns and pot the same way as you feel about drugs that haven't been legalised in your area.
Anyway, legalisation of drugs isn't the hard bit, it's the regulation that can be tricky to get right....
How would you feel about Mexican military doing operations in the US?
It would ideally be a combined operation, obviously. Mexico either can't or refuses to clean house. If the cartels are spilling over the border then the US has every right to excise them at the source bin Laden style.
What the fuck are you even talking about? What organisation has the US wiped out with this approach? Last I checked the Taliban is still going.
The cartels are violent organisations that are deeply embedded in Mexico. Killing a bunch of them won't resolve the actual problems that facilitated their rise.
Ffs. It's like someone walked out of a time machine from 2002 and started spouting posy-9/11 rhetoric. And I'm reminded of just how fucking stupid everyone was back then. Read a fucking book.
Last I checked the Taliban is still going.
You're absolutely right.
Even better, thanks to U.S involvement, they've got a whole country in their clutches now!
🇺🇸✌️MISSION ACCOMPLISHED!✌️🦅
There's times when violent intervention is unavoidable, and cartels are decidedly not a force for good in this world, but it's seriously sad how we've conditioned the civilian populace into casually thinking "Maybe if we just killed them all that would fix problems!"
"Just one more invasion bro. Just one more, just one more drone strike bro. It'll fix everything this time! Trust me bro. One more Contra op! Just bump my defense stonks a little bit bro! Just little bump! C'moooon!"
How would you feel if a foreign power invaded your country to spy and destabilize your government and economy under the pretext of a supposed war on drugs, using what is evidently the wrong tools and methods for the supposed job?
My money would be on the cartels if this happened.
Once again, Thank You President Sheinbaum!!
A community for discussing events around the World
Rule 1: posts have the following requirements:
Rule 2: Do not copy the entire article into your post. The key points in 1-2 paragraphs is allowed (even encouraged!), but large segments of articles posted in the body will result in the post being removed. If you have to stop and think "Is this fair use?", it probably isn't. Archive links, especially the ones created on link submission, are absolutely allowed but those that avoid paywalls are not.
Rule 3: Opinions articles, or Articles based on misinformation/propaganda may be removed. Sources that have a Low or Very Low factual reporting rating or MBFC Credibility Rating may be removed.
Rule 4: Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, anti-religious, or ableist will be removed. “Ironic” prejudice is just prejudiced.
Posts and comments must abide by the lemmy.world terms of service UPDATED AS OF 10/19
Rule 5: Keep it civil. It's OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It's NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
Rule 6: Memes, spam, other low effort posting, reposts, misinformation, advocating violence, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.
Rule 7: We didn't USED to need a rule about how many posts one could make in a day, then someone posted NINETEEN articles in a single day. Not comments, FULL ARTICLES. If you're posting more than say, 10 or so, consider going outside and touching grass. We reserve the right to limit over-posting so a single user does not dominate the front page.
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
News !news@lemmy.world
Politics !politics@lemmy.world
World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world
For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/