106
submitted 4 days ago by Pro@mander.xyz to c/climate@slrpnk.net
top 6 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Enkers@sh.itjust.works 14 points 4 days ago

Yep. They also spend a huge amount of advertising $$ to perpetuate the myth of "happy farm animals". AnAg is one of the least ethical industries out there.

[-] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 9 points 4 days ago

Didn’t you know? Cow farts make flowers bloom and turn garbage into honey. Oh, wait. That’s not true.

[-] MrMakabar@slrpnk.net 3 points 4 days ago

They can do that, if used as a proxy for the aurochs. But that is very different to meat production.

[-] veganpizza69@lemmy.vg 2 points 3 days ago

I'm so sick of these villains.

[-] FundMECFSResearch@lemmy.cafe 4 points 3 days ago

The meat industry may have enlisted environmental groups to persuade people to “feel better” about eating beef, despite the sector’s ballooning emissions of climate-heating pollution, according to a public relations strategy document

The plan, created in 2021 by MHP Group, a London-based communications agency, was addressed to the the Global Roundtable for Sustainable Beef, an umbrella organization comprised of beef-related companies such as restaurant chain McDonald’s and Brazil-based JBS — the world’s largest meat-packer. Other members include powerful American meat lobbies such as the Meat Institute, and nonprofits the Nature Conservancy and the World Wildlife Fund.

The proposal aimed in part at blunting growing public enthusiasm for “opting out of eating beef as alternative options become tastier, cheaper and more accessible,” in favor of seeing “beef [as] a natural and nutritious source of iron and protein” that “is enjoyed by millions.”

MHP Group’s strategy identified policymakers, regulators, investors, and beef industry stakeholders as its primary audiences. Its goals included promoting the Roundtable as “power[ing] progress in sustainable beef” as well as “champion[ing] best practices,” and assuring people that there was “growing momentum in the beef industry to protect and nurture the earth’s natural resources.”

The plan also targeted consumers who “feel ‘guilty’ about eating beef due to environmental and/or health reasons.” Here, the communications goal was “to help them feel better about eating beef (if not every day, then at least occasionally), and to be more aware of the ways in which the industry is protecting the planet and making progress.”

[-] FundMECFSResearch 5 points 3 days ago

Reminder that cutting down on beef is one of the simplest way to lower emissions:

this post was submitted on 06 Aug 2025
106 points (100.0% liked)

Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.

7116 readers
359 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world.  About 1C of total warming.  Second chart:  about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability.  Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases.  About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS