345
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] heyWhatsay@slrpnk.net 6 points 20 hours ago

I'm already boycotting rockstar, just make offline games and stop with the invasive bs

Now my money is going to indie developers

[-] FlembleFabber@sh.itjust.works 3 points 15 hours ago

(almost) every game is an offline game if you pirate it ;)

[-] ksigley@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago

🏴‍☠️

[-] schizolol9@lemy.lol 3 points 18 hours ago

Im bout to crash out this is absolutely the most stupidest idea ever. Anyone should be able to play this game regardless of age.

[-] seralth@lemmy.world 1 points 14 hours ago

If the game isn't rated AO it shouldn't have an age verification.

R rating is fucking 17+ not 18+. R rating is still for minors.

If your game needs an age rating then you shouldn't be allowed to have an R rating straight to AO for you.

Oh what's that visa won't let you sell your AO rated game?

Too fucking bad.

Maybe find a better solution then. ):<

[-] RaivoKulli@sopuli.xyz 2 points 18 hours ago

I wouldn't mind not having to play with children. But it's a privacy issue

[-] Joelk111@lemmy.world 2 points 19 hours ago

What about disabling the shitty anti-cheat or even just enabling it on Linux so I, as a 27yo, can play the damn game?

[-] aesthelete@lemmy.world 17 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

With the reputation most companies have with leaking and breached data, who wouldn't want to have their ssn and license on file with rock star games?!

[-] umbrella@lemmy.ml 10 points 1 day ago

guess ill be pirating the next one, since there will be no online mode.

[-] ivanafterall@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

Same exact thought.

[-] vxx@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago

The same parents that allow their children to play these games now will allow them to play then.

This will just make me not want to play these games.

If they roll this out to my country, I'm just not buying any of their games. My privacy is worth a lot more than that.

I might still play them, I just won't buy them, because I'm not doing age verification.

[-] Lfrith@lemmy.ca 142 points 2 days ago

GTA online is the worst thing to happen to the series, since it killed off story DLCs. Which were a fantastic way to get new story based content for their games between the years long wait between sequels. Damn those gamers and their obsession with buying microtransactions.

[-] echodot@feddit.uk 23 points 2 days ago

Then they double killed it when they started introducing nonsense like flying cars with rocket launchers.

[-] ipkpjersi@lemmy.ml 10 points 2 days ago

Don't forget when they triple killed it by not enabling Proton support.

[-] umbrella@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 day ago

worse, they disabled it. it worked perfectly on proton then they blocked it off.

[-] real_squids@sopuli.xyz 23 points 2 days ago

On the flip side, it's given it insane longevity and made it feel more modern. Playing singleplayer feels so annoying at times because of their arbitrary rules (which are still in online, but toned down a little) and gameplay/mission design.

At least GTAO showed everyone rockstar's true nature, and you couldn't turn away or say that it's a small alternative game mode.
So shoutout to online and 5 as a whole for showing me enough to avoid all future rockstar titles lol

[-] tootoughtoremember@lemmy.world 21 points 2 days ago

GTA5 was released in 2013. GTA6 is being released 13 years later. If there had been no GTAO, we would have had at least one or two more "modern" GTA releases in that window.

[-] Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 19 hours ago

I would think so.
Considering for how detailed the world is, I can see them working for a long time on it (maybe not 13 years but longer than between 4 and 5).

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] TheMonk@lemmings.world 9 points 2 days ago

I don’t understand why people needed to give them constant money. For real, I played for a minute but never spent a dime. Why buy things when you can achieve them?

[-] binarytobis@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago

To be honest I regret spending so much time earning money and buying so many cars. It would have been more fun riding around in a stolen piece of trash robbing liquor stores with a friend than grinding the bank heist over and over.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] tinned_tomatoes@feddit.uk 36 points 2 days ago

Isn't GTAV an 18 rated game? So children shouldn't be able to buy it in the first place.

[-] seralth@lemmy.world 1 points 14 hours ago

It's M rated. M ratings are 17+ the ESRB rating for 18+ is AO.

M ratings are for minors, AO is for adults.

You need to ID to buy an AO game, you do not for M unless it's a individual store policy.

Due to anti porn sentiment and stores refusing to carry porn. Only 24 games have ever gotten the AO rating

It's considered a death flag.

It's much like how the Deadpool movie was R rated instead of pg13. This was considered a huge risk cause R rates movies don't make money was the common theory.

But even then R rating is also for minors. Movies have the NC-17 rating which is for 18+ and thus only adults. This would be the AO rating in games.

Stores and public facing businesses are so piss scared of having adult rated content even if it's not porn, just because of the vague idea that adult only content HAS to be porn cause "what else would it be"

That rating systems have undermined their very purpose and become fucking useless. It's why everything is only M rated instead of being AO when it really should be.

[-] tinned_tomatoes@feddit.uk 1 points 13 hours ago

It's not really relevant as the UK rating system doesn't have M or AO clarifications. The game is rated 18 so it's for adults only.

[-] vacuumflower@lemmy.sdf.org 6 points 1 day ago

The point is to make children used to checks.

It's a didactic law.

IRL usually children grow up feeling they are free (except for their parents) to an extent.

This is intended so that identifying yourself in the Internet were normal by the time you grow up for it to matter.

But, of course, there might be some good considerations, if you're into playing devil's advocate. People might remember which stupid shit they were posting when they were younger, and want for future generations to be always conscious of the difference between pseudonymity and anonymity, and superficial anonymity vs real. People might want to make it so that nobody had a false sense of security, leading to really bad mistakes. People might want this to be the step preceding some way to fight bots.

And they might even not have good considerations, but eventually realize that the oppressive system they are building is best rebuilt for something better and used differently. Wouldn't be the first time in history.

It's just that laying down your arms in hopes for that is unwise.

[-] themachinestops@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

This falls on the parents instead because of dumb laws every one has to deal with this, I just hope that not all countries are this insane:

users in the UK have had to take photos of themselves and upload it to a service that uses AI to guess their age. Or, send in photos of ID such as passports or driving licenses.

[-] Dirk@lemmy.ml 117 points 2 days ago

They would lose likely 98% of their player base.

maybe the goal is instead to try to get ahead of regulation by implementing a system that is easily bypassed by most kids (like these video based age estimations). Then they can show this to the regulator and be like: "look were already doing everything we can, no need to actually put the regulation in place".

[-] bjoern_tantau@swg-empire.de 23 points 2 days ago

Seriously. Our school had a presentation by a guy about kids and computer usage. The gist of it was: Roblox bad, because of paedophiles. GTA good, because it furthers role playing. Basically the opposite of the age recommendations.

[-] Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 19 hours ago

Welll...Depends on if you install mods I guess?

[-] Senseless@feddit.org 26 points 2 days ago

Maybe that actually makes it playable. But who am I kidding?

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] yggstyle@lemmy.world 18 points 2 days ago

Maybe I'm dating myself but this is the same company that released state of emergency for the PS2? That game you could literally mow down people in a mall with a mini gun?

They were worried about "the children?" News to me.

[-] Blackmist@feddit.uk 5 points 1 day ago

My mum enjoyed the bonus level in the mall where you could just kill like 100 people as fast as you could.

Her favourite weapon is the flamethrower.

Her first reaction to the game was "that's disgusting", but I let her have a go and suddenly she was toasting a whole crowd and loving every minute of it.

[-] Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 19 hours ago

That's disgusting!

Where can I find more!

[-] Muffi@programming.dev 9 points 1 day ago

They have way more investors to jerk off and please now

[-] lemmyknow@lemmy.today 2 points 1 day ago

I remember when me neighbour got Bully, another Rockstar game

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] AlphaOmega@lemmy.world 20 points 2 days ago

Can you even call it GTA online if there aren't a dozen 12 year olds running around screaming, "N***** and F*****".

[-] Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 19 hours ago

Can you call it that when chat is disabled anyway ; D

[-] Bennyboybumberchums@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago

Moms are still getting plenty of action though, right? Wont someone think of the moms!!!!

[-] FuckFascism@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

I'm thinking of your mom right now don't worry maboy.

Phew. I dont know what she'd do, with out all the xbox bros fucking her 12 times a night...

[-] FuckFascism@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

Np bro that's what I'm here for.

Good stuff. Cos lets be honest, those 80 year old hip bones aint gonna pop themselves in and out of place...

[-] FuckFascism@lemmy.world 2 points 23 hours ago

You're damn right they're not.

[-] Sabata11792@ani.social 36 points 2 days ago

So, I loose no functionality when I pirate it?

[-] cyberpunk007@lemmy.ca 10 points 2 days ago

Wrong. You "lose" the age verification feature.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 04 Aug 2025
345 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

73698 readers
3377 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS