212
It called a concept if a plan.. of course they can’t figure it out because the Cheeto ha no idea what he is doing.
Seems to me that it’s time for other nations to make the best of the prisoner’s dilemma and drop tariffs with each other while sanctioning the US. After all, the US at this point has broken almost all its treaties and trade agreements. There’s no reason for the rest of the world to honour what no longer exists.
Stop negotiating and play hardball. Thank you, where's my 6 digit salary?
These countries need to walk away from the table until someone stable can take over negotiations. Why would anyone sign a trade deal with someone, knowing they are never going to honor the conditions they just agreed to? By next week, Trump will have completely forgotten that he signed anything...so why bother?
Why would anyone sign a trade deal
because of money, there's no other explanation needed. No other country consumes as much as the US, and you need them to keep buying your exports.
If that isn't enough for you, the Europe relies Heavily on the US for its defense. Every country has a military base, only France (can't remember who else) has nukes, so if you want to not be invaded, you kinda have to bend a knee.
What is crazy is that it has been like this for decades, while Europe let itself be dominated by the special interests, and now it cannot unify against the hand that used to feed and protect it.
And Russia has been arming like crazy, hoping to gobble anything it can.
The UK has nukes. Tho it's not entirely sovereign as their ballistic submarines use American Trident II missiles. Which are on lease and maintained in the US. Still independent launch, just not long term.
https://ukdefencejournal.org.uk/heres-how-britains-nukes-are-operationally-independent/
Also they want to purchase F-35A to drop nuclear bombs but that would be Americans B61 and not even on lease. just straight up only work if the US wants to. Also the F-35A can't be refueled by existing UK tanker aircraft because American jet use boom refueling while everyone else use drogue refueling.
UK is probably the biggest supporter of the US in Europe (along with Poland) and is not a part of the EU, hence not affected by the tariffs mentioned by the OP
Canada and irc Japan got hit by tariffs or threatened to... I'm realizing with all this will they, won't they, I don't know what tariffs ended up in place.
Point is being a close ally isn't saving you from the look of it.
Thank you for sources.
I wonder why I'm getting downvotes, though.
I voted you down just now because I despise Internet strangers who complain about Internet points
Could not give a fuck about points, but if I'm not correct, please explain why.
Lol! Ok. Would you buy something you don't even need, from a supplier that is going to change the price on you every other day, just to try and fuck you over?
Nothing you said, makes up for the fact that Trump is an unreliable trade partner. In fact, all of the factors you mentioned make for very good reasons to find other supply connections. If those things are that important, then dealing with Trump is the stupidest way to try and guarantee steady business.
I'm talking about EU exports, and yes, you do need countries who buy your shit. Specially when the rest of the world doesn't shop as much.
I'm also not defending Trump. But I get why countries try to work with him: swapping a large business partner on the world map hurts everyone. Globalization made everyone depend on everything, and such a gigantic swap will destroy a lot of wealth all around.
And people are not ready to go hungry.
I would suggest abandoning capitalism as whole, which would solve a lot of problems right about now.
The defense is a bit more tricky, and it needs time. But the meantime sucks.
It’s because he’s an imbecile pedophile with dementia. Let me break it down for you he wants a bribe or a child to rape.
dementia donvict.
its trrying to distract the media from THE EPSTEIN files.
Policies? What policies? What negotiation? It's haphazard short attention span theater that American taxpayers ultimately pay for.
...when was the last time you negotiated with a shitgibbbon...
Trump consistently plays the game "heads I win, tails you lose"
So, no shit Sherlock...
They should just cut off trade entirely.
It's impossible to negotiate with these guys, because they have no clear demands. They just want what "looks" like as much as they can get away with...
As a Canadian I think we shouldn't even be entertaining the thought of trade with the regime (yes I know how difficult that would be and realistically it's not immediately possible. That doesn't mean we shouldn't be working toward it) Unfortunately we have a conservative banker in liberal colors as PM and that's never going to happen.
Edit: and the same type of brain rot citizenry raised on American exceptionalism who will argue that our PM has our best interests in mind. That they believe he's smarter than the average bear and we couldn't ever comprehend his tactics because we are just dumb pleebs.
If the current trade agreements with Canada, Mexico and Japan are so terrible then whoever it was that signed them is probably unfit to try negotiating new ones. Oh wait, that was also Donald Trump.
There are trade negotiations actively running between US an EU, and Trump simply ignored it when he rolled the dice for new tariffs.
this post was submitted on 12 Jul 2025
212 points (100.0% liked)
World News
48511 readers
2348 users here now
A community for discussing events around the World
Rules:
-
Rule 1: posts have the following requirements:
- Post news articles only
- Video links are NOT articles and will be removed.
- Title must match the article headline
- Not United States Internal News
- Recent (Past 30 Days)
- Screenshots/links to other social media sites (Twitter/X/Facebook/Youtube/reddit, etc.) are explicitly forbidden, as are link shorteners.
-
Rule 2: Do not copy the entire article into your post. The key points in 1-2 paragraphs is allowed (even encouraged!), but large segments of articles posted in the body will result in the post being removed. If you have to stop and think "Is this fair use?", it probably isn't. Archive links, especially the ones created on link submission, are absolutely allowed but those that avoid paywalls are not.
-
Rule 3: Opinions articles, or Articles based on misinformation/propaganda may be removed. Sources that have a Low or Very Low factual reporting rating or MBFC Credibility Rating may be removed.
-
Rule 4: Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, anti-religious, or ableist will be removed. “Ironic” prejudice is just prejudiced.
-
Posts and comments must abide by the lemmy.world terms of service UPDATED AS OF 10/19
-
Rule 5: Keep it civil. It's OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It's NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
-
Rule 6: Memes, spam, other low effort posting, reposts, misinformation, advocating violence, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.
-
Rule 7: We didn't USED to need a rule about how many posts one could make in a day, then someone posted NINETEEN articles in a single day. Not comments, FULL ARTICLES. If you're posting more than say, 10 or so, consider going outside and touching grass. We reserve the right to limit over-posting so a single user does not dominate the front page.
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
Lemmy World Partners
News !news@lemmy.world
Politics !politics@lemmy.world
World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world
Recommendations
For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/
- Consider including the article’s mediabiasfactcheck.com/ link
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS