155
submitted 3 days ago* (last edited 1 day ago) by patatas@sh.itjust.works to c/canada@lemmy.ca

Under Mark Carney's Liberal government, the CMHC has quietly redefined 'housing affordability' to no longer mean 30% of income, but "perhaps 40-45% ... [and] over 50% of income by 2035".

top 19 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] otter@lemmy.ca 13 points 2 days ago

Hi @patatas@sh.itjust.works, please keep the original title and add your context in the post body. This post will be removed otherwise

[-] leastaction@lemmy.ca 49 points 2 days ago

CMHC is not run by the Prime Minister or the cabinet. It is a Crown Corporation governed by a Board of Directors. Mr. Carney has not "redefined affordable housing". https://www.cmhc-schl.gc.ca/about-us/management-and-governance/board-of-directors-and-its-committees

[-] patatas@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 day ago

OK, and who appoints the Board? And who sets government policy and tables a budget that determines what the CMHC can realistically do?

This is absolutely the responsibility of the federal government, even if they don't author these reports.

[-] m0darn@lemmy.ca 22 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Canadians should mail letters, ring them up, fax them if they can, to let them know that any reasonable person would consider this goal post shifting a complete abdication of their responsibilities.

National Office Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation 700 Montreal Road Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0P7

Reception/Main number: 613-748-2000 Fax: 613-748-2098

[-] Sturgist@lemmy.ca 6 points 2 days ago

Actual headline:

Redefining Affordability: Why CMHC’s Benchmark Shift Matters

[-] cecilkorik@piefed.ca 46 points 3 days ago

"What do you mean the kids are failing their classes? That's so easy to fix, just lower the passing grade!"

[-] snoons@lemmy.ca 27 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

"I plan to lower the passing grade from 50% to 40-45% and 30% by 2035."

[-] streetfestival@lemmy.ca 30 points 2 days ago

Wow, this is big. I mean, I didn't think things were going to get any more affordable, but this deepens my belief in that prediction quite a bit. "Over 50% by 2035" sounds like a fiefdom, because people got a lot more bills than rent/housing - or at least that's my oldthink perspective lol. It's also sobering that this report was published in June and failed, insofar as I know, to make any splash in any Canadian mainstream news. I'm grateful for the Fediverse

[-] patatas@sh.itjust.works 15 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Honestly I only went and looked for the report because of a post on Bluesky by Peter Julian.

That said, this post seems to have already gotten more reach than a ~~sitting~~ former MP's did on that platform, so you're right about the fediverse!

Regardless, I agree it should be much bigger news.

[-] garbagebagel@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

Oh, was Peter Julian voted out this last election? Damn I don't live there anymore but that's a shame.

[-] patatas@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 day ago

Lotta great NDP MPs lost their ridings, really sucks. Matthew Green lost here in Hamilton Centre too, so disappointing

[-] HellsBelle@sh.itjust.works 14 points 2 days ago

Rule 1, please change the headline to what is on the article.

[-] patatas@sh.itjust.works 21 points 2 days ago
[-] sbv@sh.itjust.works 11 points 2 days ago

While there are concerns that increasing housing supply would cause house prices to fall rapidly and pose a risk to financial stability, this is unlikely. Housing supply cannot be increased rapidly enough in reality to trigger such an event.

We're fucked. 🤣

[-] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 20 points 3 days ago

That is deeply, fundamentally fucked up. Canadians, consider this a warning: At this rate you won't get to say "I didn't see this coming" when you follow your neighbors down south.

[-] Archangel1313@lemmy.ca 20 points 3 days ago

Like eliminating poverty by lowering the "poverty line".

[-] Sunshine@lemmy.ca 9 points 2 days ago
[-] whoisearth@lemmy.ca 6 points 2 days ago

Carney does not run the CMHC. Your point may still be valid but in this context he did not make this decision.

[-] patatas@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 day ago

To be fair, from what I can find, their board is appointed by the federal govt and they're absolutely going to take their cues from government policy.

If the Feds had released a budget with money and a plan for housing construction, or if they were forcing large corporate landlords to start selling, or any number of other possible things, then this report would look a lot different.

this post was submitted on 12 Jul 2025
155 points (100.0% liked)

Canada

10125 readers
487 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

  2. Misinformation is not welcome here.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS