132

Explicit sexual content, defined by the province as detailed and clear depictions of sexual acts, including masturbation, penetration and ejaculation, will not be accessible to students in any grade.

also

Religious texts, such as the Bible, will be allowed on the shelves.

I'm shocked... really, like, i 100% knew that was going to be in there article. So actually, I'm not shocked. Fuck you Alberta.

all 31 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] datavoid@lemmy.ml 44 points 3 weeks ago

Ezekiel 23:20-21

She lusted after lovers with genitals as large as a donkey’s and emissions like those of a horse. And so, Oholibah, you relived your former days as a young girl in Egypt, when you first allowed your breasts to be fondled.

Good thing they have clear standards!

[-] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 8 points 3 weeks ago

They had to explicitly exempt religious texts, lol.

[-] YesButActuallyMaybe@lemmy.ca 2 points 3 weeks ago

Does that mean sexy Jesus fanfiction is still ok?

[-] BeNotAfraid@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago

Chapter 33: Nailed on The Cross

[-] friend_of_satan@lemmy.world 3 points 3 weeks ago

The word of god.

[-] Showroom7561@lemmy.ca 27 points 3 weeks ago

Religious texts, such as the Bible, will be allowed on the shelves.

... as most of the books Nicolaides said he was looking to take off shelves deal with 2SLGBTQ+ subject matter.

Have the Satanic Temple republish those books so they remain accessible.

[-] NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world 15 points 3 weeks ago

I'm actually surprised they haven't done something like that.

We're republishing Looking For Alaska, as it's now a holy text that teaches our disciples about loss and grief.

[-] MapleEngineer@lemmy.world 13 points 3 weeks ago

The Bible contains stories of rape, incest, murder, torture, dashing babies heads on rocks, prostitution, and more. Ban the Bible.

[-] BlameTheAntifa@lemmy.world 9 points 3 weeks ago

Is Trump still talking about the annexation thing because the US can have Alberta.

[-] swagmoney@lemmy.ca 7 points 3 weeks ago

oh fuck not here too. 🤦‍♂️ we really are just old america aren't we?

[-] Randomgal@lemmy.ca 5 points 3 weeks ago

NGL this sounda like a nothing burger. The news are "Adults Only" books are no longer awolled in schools? What non smutty book even fulfills that criteria?

[-] CanadianCarl@sh.itjust.works 16 points 3 weeks ago

The bible is still not removed, which has incest, adultery, more incest with rape, prostitution, more prostitution. I can list more. My question is, what is wrong with regular books, with sex in them?

[-] silasmariner@programming.dev 15 points 3 weeks ago

Lolita, The French Lieutenant's Woman, IT. All books I read as a teen with explicit sexual content...

[-] Randomgal@lemmy.ca 2 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

And you borrowed these books from your school's library?

To clarify: You borrowed fucking Lolita from your school's library? And you want other kids to be able to do the same?

[-] silasmariner@programming.dev 15 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Yeah. A couple of years after I first read it, I wrote a coursework essay about the unreliable narrator, using Lolita and Pale Fire as my primary texts (the latter also by Nabokov). What's the problem with that? I'm assuming you've not read either if you're getting this outraged, lol

[-] Randomgal@lemmy.ca 2 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Ah. We clearly had different experiences of high school. Lmao.

So is it or is not explicit btw? Does it contain 'detailed and clear depictions of sexual acts, including'? Because you seem to lean into whatever is the opposite of what I say lol. But we're taking about OP.

[-] silasmariner@programming.dev 9 points 3 weeks ago

I mean it's pretty graphic when he compares her ring to a football pump before going into licking it, but it's also hilarious

[-] Randomgal@lemmy.ca 1 points 3 weeks ago

I don't know what to tell you. If this metaphor qualifies as a 'detailed and clear' depiction of sex for you, sure I guess? I see what you're saying in that case.

Maybe I've just been exposed to more clear and detailed written depictions of sex lol.

[-] leftytighty@slrpnk.net 5 points 3 weeks ago

yes we get it you're a conservative, you don't have to prove it by continuing to try to twist facts to match your predetermined worldview

[-] Randomgal@lemmy.ca 1 points 3 weeks ago

Did you reply the wrong comment?

[-] leftytighty@slrpnk.net 3 points 3 weeks ago

ah yes lack of self awareness too

[-] Randomgal@lemmy.ca 1 points 3 weeks ago

Yikes. Glad I'm taking to a lefty and not to a hateful right winger. Lmao.

[-] leftytighty@slrpnk.net 2 points 3 weeks ago

The right doesn't have a monopoly on hate, the difference is you're always punching down

[-] silasmariner@programming.dev 2 points 3 weeks ago

Whereas the left get to hate everyone! Even each other! But the hardest part of the hate is reserved for those who would reduce the quality of our experiences by being dickheads. Say, by restricting access to art. I'm with you brother! Let us hate together! Maybe even each other!

[-] WizardofFrobozz@lemmy.ca 3 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Were you homeschooled by a pigeon? Fuckin hell, I can’t believe people like you exist outside of satire.

[-] alaphic@lemmy.world 15 points 3 weeks ago

How did it go again... "I know pornography when I see it.", wasn't it?

Which, honestly, is actually rather impressive as far as non-answers to things in general go in that it not only made the speaker simultaneously sound both like a condescending prick AND some sort-of super creepy dude who is waaaay too into porn, all while assuring us that these qualities gave them the necessary authority to... Identify porn, I guess? Ya know, like that wood book fellow

[-] ideonek@piefed.social 8 points 3 weeks ago
[-] silasmariner@programming.dev 1 points 3 weeks ago

My brother an I came up with 'Gemmell theory' which breaks down all his characters by archetype. Female archer, strong willed, 'manly' in some regards, yet sexy. Warrior. Has seen some shit, probably had a deal with a demon and/or has a destiny. Bard. Light comic relief. Probably a mate of the warrior. May know a little light magic. You get the idea. I think there are only about 5 archetypes in Gemmell theory.

[-] ideonek@piefed.social 3 points 3 weeks ago

Oh for sure. There is of course a gentle-soul warrior that is cursed with killing being his only real talent, and the giant that hide a lot of emotions under surface. Most of his books are very symilar to eachother, to the point that he uses exactly the same comparisons, metaphors and jokes sometimes... I still think he's a master-writer. Gemmel writing heroic fantasy is like Kubrick directing a porn. Genre is not enough to obscure the genius behind it.

[-] silasmariner@programming.dev 2 points 3 weeks ago

Oh I think those two are the same as the warrior, lol. My archetypes have a little tolerance. But there's definitely a dual strand -- the 'dark' hero (waylander) and the 'light' one (druss). Both ends up characterised by both aspects usually though, which is why in Gemmell theory they're unified.

Best one was lion of Macedon. I still think about that sometimes.

this post was submitted on 11 Jul 2025
132 points (100.0% liked)

Canada

10248 readers
723 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS