67
top 20 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] DMCMNFIBFFF@lemmy.world 6 points 4 days ago

wp:Density#Various materials

material ρ (kg/m3)
iron 7 870
copper 8 940
silver 10 500
lead 11 340
uranium 19 100
gold 19 320
[-] dual_sport_dork@lemmy.world 12 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

The obvious answer is to use silver. It'll work on both ducks and werewolves.

Anyway, you forgot tungsten (19.3g/cm3, even geater than gold). Alloyed with steel as it usually is in shotgun shells it's like 14.9g/cm3, denser than lead and cheaper than using it pure.

[-] Korhaka@sopuli.xyz 8 points 3 days ago

Tungsten, for when the deer start wearing Kevlar.

[-] DMCMNFIBFFF@lemmy.world 3 points 4 days ago

Isn't tungsten harder to refine?

IIUC, silver cost less than $1 a gram—the rich can afford it—and I suppose it could be recycled.

[-] dual_sport_dork@lemmy.world 10 points 4 days ago

Probably, but tungsten steel shotshells are already readily available.

The point of this is to not be broadcasting lead all over the countryside. Silver, gold, or otherwise, nobody is going to be able to pick up all the pellets from any shots that don't hit the target. And in shotgun hunting, that's most of them. Some ranges do dig up their backstops now and again and reclaim the lead, but in a hunting context that's quite impossible.

[-] DMCMNFIBFFF@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Thanks for the link.

If refining tungsten is less un-environmental than refining silver, then okay.

[-] dantheclamman@lemmy.world 8 points 4 days ago

Oh cool, now do lost IQ points in children per gram

[-] anyhow2503@lemmy.world 6 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Eagerly awaiting the results for uranium.

[-] dantheclamman@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago

Who's asking for legalization of civilian use of uranium ammunition?

[-] TexasDrunk@lemmy.world 6 points 3 days ago

Me, but no one will listen. I did manage to score some plutonium from The Libyans, though, so I'm good for now.

[-] 5714@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 3 days ago

You better know how they found you or you get fatmanned again.

[-] omgboom@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 3 days ago

Libertarians

[-] DMCMNFIBFFF@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago

Eagerly awaiting the reults for uranium.

Keep waiting.

[-] bishoponarope@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago

To be fair, if your aims good enough you can remove all their IQ points with just a few grams of lead

[-] DMCMNFIBFFF@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago
[-] dantheclamman@lemmy.world 6 points 3 days ago

"each increase of 10 µg per deciliter in the lifetime average blood lead concentration was associated with a 4.6-point decrease in IQ" https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4046839/

"cities/towns with more firearms had higher pediatric blood lead levels (highest quartile fully adjusted prevalence ratio ((aPR) = 1.18; 95% CI, 1.09, 1.30) with a significant increase in pediatric blood lead per increase in firearms" https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S001393512300511X

[-] DMCMNFIBFFF@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago

Thank you. 🙂

[-] PyroNeurosis 1 points 3 days ago

Bismuth is also a popular substitute.

Good law, other kinds of shot work fine, you just have to get a bit closer

this post was submitted on 10 Jul 2025
67 points (100.0% liked)

Environment

393 readers
27 users here now

Your definitive source for news, information, issues and activism related to the environment.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS