Death rates correlate with education levels, urbanization rate, alcohol consumption, car size, driving laws, speed cameras, and road design.
Fatalities per capita is probably less interesting than fatalities per unit of distance driven.
There are states in Australia that can swallow Texas whole. Long distance driving is unavoidable, so it's less useful as a metric because it can't be changed easily. It would mean improving public transport, subsidising domestic flights, etc - and we all know how likely that is.
Pretty clear pattern with the US states. The lowest death rates are decidedly blue and the highest are decidedly red.
Like Tal said, a confounder for that would be distances driven. There are probably similar ones like rural/uban populations etc. It would be great to see a study allowing for these.
I couldn't find one but I didnt look very hard.
edit: coundn't
Death rates correlate with education levels, culture, urbanization rate, car size, driving laws, speed cameras and road design.
In that order?
edit: OK, so I actually watched the video: #1 was vehicle miles/kms travelled
Presumably, people drive more frequently and for longer distances in the red states. Everyone I know back in my home red state commutes between 30 minutes to an hour, sometimes more, everyday. They're not sitting in traffic either.
I don't know why you think people would spend any less time in traffic in blue states.
Death rates correlate with education levels, culture, urbanization rate, car size, driving laws, speed cameras and road design.
The main issue is distance (and speed), not time. Your far less likely to be in a fatal car crash (or crash out any kind) in slow-moving city traffic jams vs driving from your rural house to your job in the next small town doing 85 mph on a 2-lane highway, which is the scenario a lot of folks in rural areas have every day
Death rates correlate with education levels, culture, urbanization rate, car size, driving laws, speed cameras and road design.
Correlation is not causation. They never addressed speed or distance, which are clearly the biggest factors in the chances of fatality and the chances of having a wreck at all (respectively)
From the video:
I'm guessing that these are in order of correlation. I didn't notice a source or follow up further.
From the linked source, #1 is miles driven. You can keep copy/pasting the same thing in response to people hypothesizing miles driven is the biggest cause, but it won't change the fact that you are wrong.
It's not time in traffic. It's time NOT in traffic. Traffic is slow and not often deadly. Driving for an hour at 70mph is much more dangerous than an hour at 25mph.
And blue states often have bigger cities with slower traffic and shorter commute distances.
Arkansas at #3. I am not remotely shocked. People here drive like complete morons who are oblivious to everyone else on the road. Just on your average trip to Bentonville -- which is about 8 miles from me -- you're almost guaranteed to see half a dozen cars blow through a red light. I've had more close calls than I can count.
Unless I miscounted they seem to be missing a few states.
They only included the two thirds of states that best supported their intended message.
I’m a proud resident of one of Canada’s only four provinces.
What a coincidence, I'm a proud resident of one of Australia's only four states.
That chart is incomplete.
What makes you say that?
It doesn't have 50 american states, 10 provinces 3 territories, and 8 Australian states (sorry I don't know if they are classed otherwise)
Where does it say it was supposed to? I don't say anything about all states anywhere in the title or in the graphic.
It says that it is for the 3 countries then breaks it down by region. It then doesn't have all regions. The graph or OP doesn't mention the exclusions.
Putting it behind a link seems like building a narrative.
No it says it's for major states and provinces.
Major is subjective. If you are going to use terms like that and only give a graph you should define the term.
And that's completely legitimate argument to make, though I think you'd have trouble arguing that any of the ones left off this graph constitute major. However you'll note that it's a completely different argument.
Currently live in Louisiana, close to Arkansas border. The roads are just as bad as the drivers. I learned to drive when I still lived in Cali. I've had to find tune my predictive idiot sense living where I do now. I legit think vehicles are sold here without blinker fluid
I'm willing to bet half those BC stats are actually Albertans driving into the mountains. Significantly more westbound than eastbound fatalities in the Rockies. If you fall asleep at the wheel in Alberta you wake up in the middle of a corn field. If you fall asleep at the wheel in BC you don't wake up.
While I don’t disagree there’s a high likelihood it’s Albertans, very few Albertans drive west and not back east again, so your anecdotal data doesn’t represent your argument.
I'm from Washington and I'm surprised we're not higher. In the winter it's dark during both morning and evening rush hour, meaning most people are doing their commutes in the dark. It can feel pretty dangerous sometimes.
Look closer at the ranking of states. This isn't about weather or external causes. Wisconsin and Minnesota have much worse weather in the winter and are almost as dark in the winter as Washington with similar death rates, but their rates are much lower than Mississippi and Alabama who have no snow and more sunlight in winter. The three are lower even than Arizona, which is usually sunny and rarely has snow.
External things like how many miles are driven on average by the people in the state is huge. Also things like speeding culture, average car safety (poor states have shittier cars or old trucks), and road maintenance are all big impacts, too.
I don't know enough to be able to extrapolate anything from it, but sounds like there's a lot to unpack for those like you who can.
I'm genuinely surprised Utah isn't higher on this list. I've driven in many states, and that state has by far the worst drivers I've encountered.
And Massachusetts.
Massholes were particularly bad drivers, but I think the speeds are typically lower and the quality of car higher than some poorer and more wide open states.
Massholes are aggressive, but not necessarily bad drivers. New Jersey, on the other hand...
There are a lot of missing people underwater in their cars, in the South and Midwest.
Missing states..
14 missing states, including South/North Dakota, Montana, Wyoming, Idaho, Nebraska, Alaska, Vermont, New Hampshire, Maine, Delaware, Rhode Island, Hawaii, and West Virginia. Most of those states barely have 100,000 people.
Those 14 are the least populated states. However, with the exception of Wyoming, Vermont, Alaska, and the Dakotas all of them have populations over 1 Million. Wyoming, the least populous state, has a population of 590,000.
I wouldn't exactly call that "barely 100,000."
No shit. It's called exaggeration.
As a MA resident, I have always said that we're highly aggressive drivers but overall pretty safe as long as you can walk the walk. Just never show fear.
Its actually really easy, don't be a fuckwit and you won't get fucked with.
Am I stupid? Where's New Hampshire?
We learn something new every day. This is a community dedicated to informing each other and helping to spread knowledge.
The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:
Rule 1- All posts must begin with TIL. Linking to a source of info is optional, but highly recommended as it helps to spark discussion.
** Posts must be about an actual fact that you have learned, but it doesn't matter if you learned it today. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.**
Rule 2- Your post subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.
Your post subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.
Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.
Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.
Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.
That's it.
Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.
Posts and comments which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.
Rule 6- Regarding non-TIL posts.
Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-TIL posts using the [META] tag on your post title.
Rule 7- You can't harass or disturb other members.
If you vocally harass or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.
Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.
For further explanation, clarification and feedback about this rule, you may follow this link.
Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.
Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.
Let everyone have their own content.
Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.
Unless included in our Whitelist for Bots, your bot will not be allowed to participate in this community. To have your bot whitelisted, please contact the moderators for a short review.
You can view our partnered communities list by following this link. To partner with our community and be included, you are free to message the moderators or comment on a pinned post.
For inquiry on becoming a moderator of this community, you may comment on the pinned post of the time, or simply shoot a message to the current moderators.