101
submitted 1 month ago by tux0r@feddit.org to c/technology@lemmy.world

Welcome to the future, where asking a question costs $4.99 and you'll never be able to find out if the answer is right or not.

top 37 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] TidBit@mander.xyz 33 points 1 month ago

Without Google's grubby paws across most the web, it'd be much more like the initial intent of what the internet was supposed to be, a welcoming place with open and accessible info!

If you don't want to pay to access a web search service, just use docker and run your own SearXNG instance! This will also allow you to host our own AI model that searches the web through SearXNG. While it may sound like a lot of work, it truly takes an afternoon and some unused RAM on your PC to make happen, then you're set up!

[-] zout@fedia.io 21 points 1 month ago

the initial intent of what the internet was supposed to be

A communication network for scientists and the military?

[-] TidBit@mander.xyz 7 points 1 month ago

Good call, I should have worded that better. While the government and scientists were instrumental in creating the foundation for the internet, I was thinking more along the lines of the early PC era. When the internet was more or less a tool for openly sharing and discussing information as well as ideas.

But a lot of tech stems from governmental need and/or government funding. I mean, the modern refrigerator was a result of NASA problem solving for the environmental conditions found in space! GPS, LASIK, MRI's, LED's, barcodes, closed captioning, and the human genome project were all also thanks to government research too!

[-] zout@fedia.io 2 points 1 month ago

Thanks for taking my trolling in good stride. I actually loved the internet of 20 years ago. It was totally different from today, it's actually a shame a lot of the way it was is gone forever. I vividly remember frequenting a few blogs, just slow chatting in the comments, making your own response images, hosting your own stuff like these images, sound clips and whatever else. Most ISP's would give you some server space to host your own static html pages, and lot's of people used this. The blogs would host photoshop contests, link to stuff they liked, reported on news or music or whatever their niche. The blogs I visited are mostly still around today, but they just don't draw the engagement anymore.

[-] Blisterexe@lemmy.zip 2 points 4 weeks ago

I'm just sad I'm too young to have ever seen that old internet, and what it was like...

Makes me more determined to try and steer the current internet back in that direction though.

[-] Ilovethebomb@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 month ago

While it may sound like a lot of work, it truly takes an afternoon and some unused RAM on your PC to make happen, then you're set up!

This shit is why open source software has a bad reputation.

[-] bridgeenjoyer@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 month ago

Im going to look into this. What's the benefit of hosting your own searxng instance?

[-] MalReynolds@slrpnk.net 7 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

It's yours, no issues trusting a public instance with your searches. Pages full of settings to tweak as you like. Less problems with an algorithm 'helping' you. It averages searches over multiple search engines that you choose, you can set up your own (or a curated) block list of crappy AI slop sites, don't like fandom.com or something, gone. Manage your own bangs, e.g. !aa for annas-archive. Pipe it through a VPN with gluetun for better isolation. If you have your head around docker already it's more like half an hour to set up, so why not?

Can hook it up to perplexica and a local LLM for a fully local AI search that you define, use it as a MCP server, do deep research with it...

[-] bridgeenjoyer@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 month ago

That is awesome. A little beyond me but I've played in docker a bit. Is a VPN needed to keep your ip from being exposed ?

Is just using an existing searxng instance just less secure then?

[-] MalReynolds@slrpnk.net 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Is a VPN needed to keep your ip from being exposed ?

No more so than using any search engine directly, it's a nice to have. Don't let perfect be the enemy of good enough.

Is just using an existing searxng instance just less secure then?

By the time you've investigated it, you could have stood up your own instance...

[-] tux0r@feddit.org 2 points 1 month ago

If you don’t want to pay to access a web search service, just use docker

IMO: My personal problem with Docker is that it creates its own kind of vendor lock-in. Docker does not run on the server operating systems I use. The tendency is towards a Linux monoculture and that is never a good idea. Docker is a symptom, not a solution.

[-] MajinBlayze@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

Is it really vendor lock-in if you can fork it at your whim?

[-] Quill7513@slrpnk.net 6 points 1 month ago

forking doesn't really help with the underlying problem that docker is a layer to run on top of Linux's KVM. at a certain point though, it's become standard enough though that BSD not having a good way to support docker, or any other CRI containerization service for that matter, is a BSD failure, not a containerization failure

[-] MajinBlayze@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

docker is a layer to run on top of Linux's KVM

My understanding is that this is only true for docker desktop, which there's not really any reason to use on a server.

Sure, since containers use the host's kernel, any Linux containers do need to either have Linux as the host or run a VM (as docker desktop does by default), but that's not particularly unique to docker

[-] MalReynolds@slrpnk.net 5 points 1 month ago

podman exists and doesn't force root...

[-] MajinBlayze@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

That's true, but all of their problem with docker are that it's Linux

[-] MalReynolds@slrpnk.net 1 points 1 month ago

Sounds like a them problem then.

[-] very_well_lost@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

Docker enshitification coming in 3... 2... 1...

[-] mesamunefire@piefed.social 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Meh there's a ton of other services like opentofu, podman, vms, ect...

[-] Pirate@feddit.org 13 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

We know what the internet would have been without Google and other corporations closing it down because some of us lived it.

It was mostly decentralised niche forums that you had to know the links for, and you'd receive random emails telling you to visit this or that new site. People would also share links around school.

Sure, there was a chance you'd get Chlamydia if you opened the wrong link, but it was exciting and overall the experience was wholesome.

[-] tux0r@feddit.org 6 points 1 month ago

I had to advertise my first website on paper!

[-] HubertManne@piefed.social 13 points 1 month ago

A massive amount of folks are fucked due to using google for email, data storage, calendar, contacts, etc.

[-] samus12345@sh.itjust.works 12 points 1 month ago

Using other search engines, I imagine.

[-] reksas@sopuli.xyz 9 points 1 month ago

just dont use google? I havent used google search for years now and there hasnt been single time where i would have needed to use google search even once. Though unfortunately i'm still bound to the damn gmail because i cant find better alternative for it.

[-] tux0r@feddit.org 3 points 1 month ago

Though unfortunately i’m still bound to the damn gmail because i cant find better alternative for it.

I self-host my e-mails, but that probably isn't a viable solution for just everyone.

[-] reksas@sopuli.xyz 5 points 1 month ago

i just want a service that i dont have to hassle with, so this would definitely not be good for me 😅 Also i dont think many places even accept self hosted email as "real", at least some places dont accept alias addresses.

its so annoying when any decent alternative costs money, which isnt very good thing for my "official" email which i need for important things. Dont want to end up in situation where i get locked out of it because i didnt or couldnt pay for some reason. Though i constantly have to slightly fear that with google too since they can lock anyone's account for any reason they see fit.

[-] eleitl@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 month ago

Gmail is way more reliable than anything I could self-host. It's a huge pile of unsorted junk that is only usable with search.

[-] Gradually_Adjusting@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago

Literally just use Wikipedia more

[-] fubarx@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago

They've already got it mapped out.

[-] cygnus@lemmy.ca 13 points 1 month ago

Ah yes, the Volvo S90 and VW Passat, definitely SUVs. Even Google's screenshots show 40% garbage.

[-] 6nk06@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 month ago
[-] tux0r@feddit.org 2 points 1 month ago

I hope that won't disappear anytime soon!

[-] Allero@lemmy.today 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

written before reading the article; it get the topic from another, more interesting and less imaginary, angle

Do we explore it post-Google or post-anything that would take its place?

Because those are two very different scenarios. There are plenty of Big Tech corps that are willing to take Google's place.

If we actually mean no one does search with targeted advertising and stuff, my bets are on more indie sites popping up, and Fediverse getting stronger as well.

We'll have more link indices, and more relevant search results hosted on different corners of the Internet.

On the negative: unless open-source projects step up their game, usability and quality of web interfaces will suffer dramatically. And without truly massive Fediverse or at least decent webrings, finding basic information and connecting to others might actually get harder.

[-] crystalmerchant@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

Lmao there's whole books about this. One is Life After Google, published 10 (?) years ago and it said blockchain would rule the world :) The subtitle is literally "The Fall Of Big Data And The Rise Of The Blockchain Economy"

[-] IsaamoonKHGDT_6143@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 month ago

Everything remains the same or with few changes

[-] vane@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I am asking my local searxng. As long as websites produce content there will be search robot that will crawl them, doesn't matter if it's google or common crawl dump. The content will be scrapped and indexed and you will be able to chose from where to find it. Google just relies on users that are locked in their freemium services. If they can force users to pay the users will pay for search. Fortunately for me I am not one of them. Good luck.

[-] macaw_dean_settle@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

No different for me. I have never used googol garbage so nothing will change.

this post was submitted on 01 Jul 2025
101 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

73534 readers
2578 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS